Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.08
    0.083250985 = sum of:
      0.062071178 = product of:
        0.24828471 = sum of:
          0.24828471 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.24828471 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.44177356 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.021179808 = product of:
        0.042359617 = sum of:
          0.042359617 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.042359617 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Liu, R.-L.: ¬A passage extractor for classification of disease aspect information (2013) 0.05
    0.046606395 = product of:
      0.09321279 = sum of:
        0.09321279 = sum of:
          0.05791311 = weight(_text_:i in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05791311 = score(doc=1107,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.29466638 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
          0.03529968 = weight(_text_:22 in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03529968 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Retrieval of disease information is often based on several key aspects such as etiology, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and symptoms of diseases. Automatic identification of disease aspect information is thus essential. In this article, I model the aspect identification problem as a text classification (TC) problem in which a disease aspect corresponds to a category. The disease aspect classification problem poses two challenges to classifiers: (a) a medical text often contains information about multiple aspects of a disease and hence produces noise for the classifiers and (b) text classifiers often cannot extract the textual parts (i.e., passages) about the categories of interest. I thus develop a technique, PETC (Passage Extractor for Text Classification), that extracts passages (from medical texts) for the underlying text classifiers to classify. Case studies on thousands of Chinese and English medical texts show that PETC enhances a support vector machine (SVM) classifier in classifying disease aspect information. PETC also performs better than three state-of-the-art classifier enhancement techniques, including two passage extraction techniques for text classifiers and a technique that employs term proximity information to enhance text classifiers. The contribution is of significance to evidence-based medicine, health education, and healthcare decision support. PETC can be used in those application domains in which a text to be classified may have several parts about different categories.
    Date
    28.10.2013 19:22:57
  3. Khoo, C.S.G.; Ng, K.; Ou, S.: ¬An exploratory study of human clustering of Web pages (2003) 0.03
    0.026084922 = sum of:
      0.01196505 = product of:
        0.0478602 = sum of:
          0.0478602 = weight(_text_:authors in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0478602 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.20147301 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.014119873 = product of:
        0.028239746 = sum of:
          0.028239746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028239746 = score(doc=2741,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05210816 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2741, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2741)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study seeks to find out how human beings cluster Web pages naturally. Twenty Web pages retrieved by the Northem Light search engine for each of 10 queries were sorted by 3 subjects into categories that were natural or meaningful to them. lt was found that different subjects clustered the same set of Web pages quite differently and created different categories. The average inter-subject similarity of the clusters created was a low 0.27. Subjects created an average of 5.4 clusters for each sorting. The categories constructed can be divided into 10 types. About 1/3 of the categories created were topical. Another 20% of the categories relate to the degree of relevance or usefulness. The rest of the categories were subject-independent categories such as format, purpose, authoritativeness and direction to other sources. The authors plan to develop automatic methods for categorizing Web pages using the common categories created by the subjects. lt is hoped that the techniques developed can be used by Web search engines to automatically organize Web pages retrieved into categories that are natural to users. 1. Introduction The World Wide Web is an increasingly important source of information for people globally because of its ease of access, the ease of publishing, its ability to transcend geographic and national boundaries, its flexibility and heterogeneity and its dynamic nature. However, Web users also find it increasingly difficult to locate relevant and useful information in this vast information storehouse. Web search engines, despite their scope and power, appear to be quite ineffective. They retrieve too many pages, and though they attempt to rank retrieved pages in order of probable relevance, often the relevant documents do not appear in the top-ranked 10 or 20 documents displayed. Several studies have found that users do not know how to use the advanced features of Web search engines, and do not know how to formulate and re-formulate queries. Users also typically exert minimal effort in performing, evaluating and refining their searches, and are unwilling to scan more than 10 or 20 items retrieved (Jansen, Spink, Bateman & Saracevic, 1998). This suggests that the conventional ranked-list display of search results does not satisfy user requirements, and that better ways of presenting and summarizing search results have to be developed. One promising approach is to group retrieved pages into clusters or categories to allow users to navigate immediately to the "promising" clusters where the most useful Web pages are likely to be located. This approach has been adopted by a number of search engines (notably Northem Light) and search agents.
    Date
    12. 9.2004 9:56:22
  4. Shafer, K.E.: Automatic Subject Assignment via the Scorpion System (2001) 0.02
    0.024570452 = product of:
      0.049140904 = sum of:
        0.049140904 = product of:
          0.09828181 = sum of:
            0.09828181 = weight(_text_:i in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09828181 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.50006545 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Teil eines Themenheftes: OCLC and the Internet: An Historical Overview of Research Activities, 1990-1999 - Part I
  5. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.02
    0.021179808 = product of:
      0.042359617 = sum of:
        0.042359617 = product of:
          0.08471923 = sum of:
            0.08471923 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08471923 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  6. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.02
    0.01764984 = product of:
      0.03529968 = sum of:
        0.03529968 = product of:
          0.07059936 = sum of:
            0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07059936 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  7. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.02
    0.01764984 = product of:
      0.03529968 = sum of:
        0.03529968 = product of:
          0.07059936 = sum of:
            0.07059936 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07059936 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  8. Fangmeyer, H.; Gloden, R.: Bewertung und Vergleich von Klassifikationsergebnissen bei automatischen Verfahren (1978) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=81,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  9. Bollmann, P.; Konrad, E.; Schneider, H.-J.; Zuse, H.: Anwendung automatischer Klassifikationsverfahren mit dem System FAKYR (1978) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  10. Schulze, U.: Erfahrungen bei der Anwendung automatischer Klassifizierungsverfahren zur Inhaltsanalyse einer Dokumentenmenge (1978) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 83) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=83,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 83, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=83)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Kooperation in der Klassifikation I. Proc. der Sekt.1-3 der 2. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Frankfurt-Hoechst, 6.-7.4.1978. Bearb.: W. Dahlberg
  11. Cheng, P.T.K.; Wu, A.K.W.: ACS: an automatic classification system (1995) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we introduce ACS, an automatic classification system for school libraries. First, various approaches towards automatic classification, namely (i) rule-based, (ii) browse and search, and (iii) partial match, are critically reviewed. The central issues of scheme selection, text analysis and similarity measures are discussed. A novel approach towards detecting book-class similarity with Modified Overlap Coefficient (MOC) is also proposed. Finally, the design and implementation of ACS is presented. The test result of over 80% correctness in automatic classification and a cost reduction of 75% compared to manual classification suggest that ACS is highly adoptable
  12. Panyr, J.: Automatische Indexierung und Klassifikation (1983) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 7692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=7692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 7692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Automatisierung in der Klassifikation. Proc. 7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (Teil 1), Königswinter, 5.-8.4.1983. Hrsg.: I. Dahlberg u.a
  13. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Ranganathan in the perspective of advanced information retrieval (1992) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 7695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=7695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 7695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7695)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  14. Fuhr, N.: Klassifikationsverfahren bei der automatischen Indexierung (1983) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 7697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=7697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 7697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Automatisierung in der Klassifikation. Proc. 7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (Teil 1), Königswinter, 5.-8.4.1983. Hrsg.: I. Dahlberg u.a
  15. Krauth, J.: Evaluation von Verfahren der automatischen Klassifikation (1983) 0.02
    0.0163803 = product of:
      0.0327606 = sum of:
        0.0327606 = product of:
          0.0655212 = sum of:
            0.0655212 = weight(_text_:i in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0655212 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1965379 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.33337694 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Automatisierung in der Klassifikation. Proc. 7. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (Teil 1), Königswinter, 5.-8.4.1983. Hrsg.: I. Dahlberg u.a
  16. Bianchini, C.; Bargioni, S.: Automated classification using linked open data : a case study on faceted classification and Wikidata (2021) 0.01
    0.014805994 = product of:
      0.029611988 = sum of:
        0.029611988 = product of:
          0.11844795 = sum of:
            0.11844795 = weight(_text_:authors in 724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11844795 = score(doc=724,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.23755142 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.49862027 = fieldWeight in 724, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=724)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The Wikidata gadget, CCLitBox, for the automated classification of literary authors and works by a faceted classification and using Linked Open Data (LOD) is presented. The tool reproduces the classification algorithm of class O Literature of the Colon Classification and uses data freely available in Wikidata to create Colon Classification class numbers. CCLitBox is totally free and enables any user to classify literary authors and their works; it is easily accessible to everybody; it uses LOD from Wikidata but missing data for classification can be freely added if necessary; it is readymade for any cooperative and networked project.
  17. Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989) 0.01
    0.012354888 = product of:
      0.024709776 = sum of:
        0.024709776 = product of:
          0.049419552 = sum of:
            0.049419552 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049419552 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  18. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.01
    0.012354888 = product of:
      0.024709776 = sum of:
        0.024709776 = product of:
          0.049419552 = sum of:
            0.049419552 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049419552 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  19. Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002) 0.01
    0.012354888 = product of:
      0.024709776 = sum of:
        0.024709776 = product of:
          0.049419552 = sum of:
            0.049419552 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049419552 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 9:22:09
  20. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.012354888 = product of:
      0.024709776 = sum of:
        0.024709776 = product of:
          0.049419552 = sum of:
            0.049419552 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049419552 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1824739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05210816 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 13

Types

  • a 38
  • el 4
  • x 1
  • More… Less…