Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Klassifizieren"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.09
    0.09020579 = sum of:
      0.07705885 = product of:
        0.23117656 = sum of:
          0.23117656 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.23117656 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.411333 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04851763 = queryNorm
              0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.013146939 = product of:
        0.039440814 = sum of:
          0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.039440814 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04851763 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Möller, G.: Automatic classification of the World Wide Web using Universal Decimal Classification (1999) 0.02
    0.024801265 = product of:
      0.04960253 = sum of:
        0.04960253 = product of:
          0.14880759 = sum of:
            0.14880759 = weight(_text_:universal in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14880759 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.58212364 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  3. Koch, T.; Ardö, A.: Automatic classification of full-text HTML-documents from one specific subject area : DESIRE II D3.6a, Working Paper 2 (2000) 0.02
    0.019841012 = product of:
      0.039682023 = sum of:
        0.039682023 = product of:
          0.11904607 = sum of:
            0.11904607 = weight(_text_:universal in 1667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11904607 = score(doc=1667,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.46569893 = fieldWeight in 1667, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1667)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1 Introduction / 2 Method overview / 3 Ei thesaurus preprocessing / 4 Automatic classification process: 4.1 Matching -- 4.2 Weighting -- 4.3 Preparation for display / 5 Results of the classification process / 6 Evaluations / 7 Software / 8 Other applications / 9 Experiments with universal classification systems / References / Appendix A: Ei classification service: Software / Appendix B: Use of the classification software as subject filter in a WWW harvester.
  4. Kragelj, M.; Borstnar, M.K.: Automatic classification of older electronic texts into the Universal Decimal Classification-UDC (2021) 0.01
    0.014029714 = product of:
      0.028059429 = sum of:
        0.028059429 = product of:
          0.084178284 = sum of:
            0.084178284 = weight(_text_:universal in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084178284 = score(doc=175,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.32929888 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of this study is to develop a model for automated classification of old digitised texts to the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), using machine-learning methods. Design/methodology/approach The general research approach is inherent to design science research, in which the problem of UDC assignment of the old, digitised texts is addressed by developing a machine-learning classification model. A corpus of 70,000 scholarly texts, fully bibliographically processed by librarians, was used to train and test the model, which was used for classification of old texts on a corpus of 200,000 items. Human experts evaluated the performance of the model. Findings Results suggest that machine-learning models can correctly assign the UDC at some level for almost any scholarly text. Furthermore, the model can be recommended for the UDC assignment of older texts. Ten librarians corroborated this on 150 randomly selected texts. Research limitations/implications The main limitations of this study were unavailability of labelled older texts and the limited availability of librarians. Practical implications The classification model can provide a recommendation to the librarians during their classification work; furthermore, it can be implemented as an add-on to full-text search in the library databases. Social implications The proposed methodology supports librarians by recommending UDC classifiers, thus saving time in their daily work. By automatically classifying older texts, digital libraries can provide a better user experience by enabling structured searches. These contribute to making knowledge more widely available and useable. Originality/value These findings contribute to the field of automated classification of bibliographical information with the usage of full texts, especially in cases in which the texts are old, unstructured and in which archaic language and vocabulary are used.
  5. Subramanian, S.; Shafer, K.E.: Clustering (2001) 0.01
    0.013146939 = product of:
      0.026293878 = sum of:
        0.026293878 = product of:
          0.07888163 = sum of:
            0.07888163 = weight(_text_:22 in 1046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07888163 = score(doc=1046,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1046, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1046)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 14:17:22
  6. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.01
    0.010955783 = product of:
      0.021911565 = sum of:
        0.021911565 = product of:
          0.06573469 = sum of:
            0.06573469 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06573469 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
  7. HaCohen-Kerner, Y. et al.: Classification using various machine learning methods and combinations of key-phrases and visual features (2016) 0.01
    0.010955783 = product of:
      0.021911565 = sum of:
        0.021911565 = product of:
          0.06573469 = sum of:
            0.06573469 = weight(_text_:22 in 2748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06573469 = score(doc=2748,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2748, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2748)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 2.2016 18:25:22
  8. Piros, A.: Automatic interpretation of complex UDC numbers : towards support for library systems (2015) 0.01
    0.009920506 = product of:
      0.019841012 = sum of:
        0.019841012 = product of:
          0.059523035 = sum of:
            0.059523035 = weight(_text_:universal in 2301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059523035 = score(doc=2301,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.25562882 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.23284946 = fieldWeight in 2301, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.268782 = idf(docFreq=618, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2301)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Analytico-synthetic and faceted classifications, such as Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) express content of documents with complex, pre-combined classification codes. Without classification authority control that would help manage and access structured notations, the use of UDC codes in searching and browsing is limited. Existing UDC parsing solutions are usually created for a particular database system or a specific task and are not widely applicable. The approach described in this paper provides a solution by which the analysis and interpretation of UDC notations would be stored into an intermediate format (in this case, in XML) by automatic means without any data or information loss. Due to its richness, the output file can be converted into different formats, such as standard mark-up and data exchange formats or simple lists of the recommended entry points of a UDC number. The program can also be used to create authority records containing complex UDC numbers which can be comprehensively analysed in order to be retrieved effectively. The Java program, as well as the corresponding schema definition it employs, is under continuous development. The current version of the interpreter software is now available online for testing purposes at the following web site: http://interpreter-eto.rhcloud.com. The future plan is to implement conversion methods for standard formats and to create standard online interfaces in order to make it possible to use the features of software as a service. This would result in the algorithm being able to be employed both in existing and future library systems to analyse UDC numbers without any significant programming effort.
  9. Bock, H.-H.: Datenanalyse zur Strukturierung und Ordnung von Information (1989) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=141,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 141, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=141)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.1-22
  10. Dubin, D.: Dimensions and discriminability (1998) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=2338,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2338, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2338)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  11. Automatic classification research at OCLC (2002) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 1563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=1563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 5.2003 9:22:09
  12. Jenkins, C.: Automatic classification of Web resources using Java and Dewey Decimal Classification (1998) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
  13. Yoon, Y.; Lee, C.; Lee, G.G.: ¬An effective procedure for constructing a hierarchical text classification system (2006) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 5273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=5273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5273)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:24:52
  14. Yi, K.: Automatic text classification using library classification schemes : trends, issues and challenges (2007) 0.01
    0.0076690475 = product of:
      0.015338095 = sum of:
        0.015338095 = product of:
          0.046014283 = sum of:
            0.046014283 = weight(_text_:22 in 2560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046014283 = score(doc=2560,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2560, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2560)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2008 18:31:54
  15. Liu, R.-L.: Context recognition for hierarchical text classification (2009) 0.01
    0.0065734694 = product of:
      0.013146939 = sum of:
        0.013146939 = product of:
          0.039440814 = sum of:
            0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 2760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039440814 = score(doc=2760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2760)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:11:54
  16. Pfeffer, M.: Automatische Vergabe von RVK-Notationen mittels fallbasiertem Schließen (2009) 0.01
    0.0065734694 = product of:
      0.013146939 = sum of:
        0.013146939 = product of:
          0.039440814 = sum of:
            0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 3051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039440814 = score(doc=3051,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3051, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3051)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 19:51:28
  17. Zhu, W.Z.; Allen, R.B.: Document clustering using the LSI subspace signature model (2013) 0.01
    0.0065734694 = product of:
      0.013146939 = sum of:
        0.013146939 = product of:
          0.039440814 = sum of:
            0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039440814 = score(doc=690,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    23. 3.2013 13:22:36
  18. Egbert, J.; Biber, D.; Davies, M.: Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification (2015) 0.01
    0.0065734694 = product of:
      0.013146939 = sum of:
        0.013146939 = product of:
          0.039440814 = sum of:
            0.039440814 = weight(_text_:22 in 2158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039440814 = score(doc=2158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2158)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    4. 8.2015 19:22:04
  19. Mengle, S.; Goharian, N.: Passage detection using text classification (2009) 0.01
    0.0054778913 = product of:
      0.010955783 = sum of:
        0.010955783 = product of:
          0.032867346 = sum of:
            0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 2765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032867346 = score(doc=2765,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2765, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2765)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:14:43
  20. Liu, R.-L.: ¬A passage extractor for classification of disease aspect information (2013) 0.01
    0.0054778913 = product of:
      0.010955783 = sum of:
        0.010955783 = product of:
          0.032867346 = sum of:
            0.032867346 = weight(_text_:22 in 1107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032867346 = score(doc=1107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16990048 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04851763 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1107)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28.10.2013 19:22:57