Search (20 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.14 
    0.14303336 = product of:
  0.5721334 = sum of:
    0.2860667 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2860667 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.30850008 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
    0.2860667 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2860667 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.30850008 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  2. Gerbé, O.; Mineau, G.W.; Keller, R.K.: Conceptual graphs, metamodelling, and notation of concepts : fundamental issues (2000) 0.01 
    0.008319592 = product of:
  0.06655674 = sum of:
    0.06655674 = weight(_text_:higher in 5078) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06655674 = score(doc=5078,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19113865 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.34821182 = fieldWeight in 5078, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.252756 = idf(docFreq=628, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5078)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Knowledge management, in particular corporate knowledge management, is a challenge companies and researchers have to meet. The conceptual graph formalism is a good candidate for the representation of corporate knowledge, and for the development of knowledge management systems. But many of the issues concerning the use of conceptual graphs as a metalanguage have not been worked out in detail. By introducing a function that maps higher level to lower level, this paper clarifies the metalevel semantics, notation and manipulation of concepts in the conceptual graph formalism. In addition, this function allows metamodeling activities to take place using the CG notation
  3. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01 
    0.007199057 = product of:
  0.057592455 = sum of:
    0.057592455 = sum of:
      0.03294192 = weight(_text_:processing in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03294192 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03638826 = queryNorm
          0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.024650536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.024650536 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03638826 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  4. Eckes, T.: Knowledge structures and knowledge representation : psychological models of conceptual order (1990) 0.01 
    0.0060296925 = product of:
  0.04823754 = sum of:
    0.04823754 = weight(_text_:data in 861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04823754 = score(doc=861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=861)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Conceptual and numerical analysis of data. Proc. of the 13th Conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 10.-12.4.1989. Ed.: O. Opitz
  5. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.00 
    0.004313844 = product of:
  0.03451075 = sum of:
    0.03451075 = product of:
      0.0690215 = sum of:
        0.0690215 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0690215 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  6. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.00 
    0.0036975802 = product of:
  0.029580642 = sum of:
    0.029580642 = product of:
      0.059161283 = sum of:
        0.059161283 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059161283 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  7. Thiel, C.: ¬Der klassische und der moderne Begriff des Begriffs : Gedanken zur Geschichte der Begriffsbildung in den exakten Wissenschaften (1994) 0.00 
    0.0035530303 = product of:
  0.028424243 = sum of:
    0.028424243 = weight(_text_:data in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028424243 = score(doc=7868,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Series
    Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization
    Source
    Information systems and data analysis: prospects - foundations - applications. Proc. of the 17th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Kaiserslautern, March 3-5, 1993. Ed.: H.-H. Bock et al
  8. Gemberling, T.: FRSAD, Semiotics, and FRBR-LRM (2016) 0.00 
    0.0035173206 = product of:
  0.028138565 = sum of:
    0.028138565 = weight(_text_:data in 5118) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028138565 = score(doc=5118,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03638826 = queryNorm
        0.24455236 = fieldWeight in 5118, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5118)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Philosophy grapples with the deepest and most difficult questions in human life. In a 2012 article, Jonathan Furner raises questions about the "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data" (FRSAD) model. Can the FRSAD framers really avoid tackling philosophical questions as they attempt to do-the long-running dispute between nominalists and realists, in particular? This article attempts to flesh out a realist position while showing some implications for the new Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records-Library Reference Model. It is not clear that FRSAD really takes a realist view, as Furner claims, and a position on the nominalist-realist debate is not necessary for information professionals.
  9. Hetzler, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships (2002) 0.00 
    0.0028824178 = product of:
  0.023059342 = sum of:
    0.023059342 = product of:
      0.046118684 = sum of:
        0.046118684 = weight(_text_:processing in 1189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046118684 = score(doc=1189,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.3130829 = fieldWeight in 1189, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1189)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Relationships can provide a rich and powerful set of information and can be used to accomplish application goals, such as information retrieval and natural language processing. A growing trend in the information science community is the use of information visualization-taking advantage of people's natural visual capabilities to perceive and understand complex information. This chapter explores how visualization and visual exploration can help users gain insight from known relationships and discover evidence of new relationships not previously anticipated.
  10. Khoo, C.; Myaeng, S.H.: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction (2002) 0.00 
    0.0024706437 = product of:
  0.01976515 = sum of:
    0.01976515 = product of:
      0.0395303 = sum of:
        0.0395303 = weight(_text_:processing in 1197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0395303 = score(doc=1197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Automatic identification of semantic relations in text is a difficult problem, but is important for many applications. It has been used for relation matching in information retrieval to retrieve documents that contain not only the concepts but also the relations between concepts specified in the user's query. It is an integral part of information extraction-extracting from natural language text, facts or pieces of information related to a particular event or topic. Other potential applications are in the construction of relational thesauri (semantic networks of related concepts) and other kinds of knowledge bases, and in natural language processing applications such as machine translation and computer comprehension of text. This chapter examines the main methods used for identifying semantic relations automatically and their application in information retrieval and information extraction.
  11. Pribbenow, S.: Meronymic relationships : from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations (2002) 0.00 
    0.0024706437 = product of:
  0.01976515 = sum of:
    0.01976515 = product of:
      0.0395303 = sum of:
        0.0395303 = weight(_text_:processing in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0395303 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Meronymic or partonomic relations are ontological relations that are considered as fundamental as the ubiquitous, taxonomic subsumption relationship. While the latter is well-established and thoroughly investigated, there is still much work to be done in the field of meronymic relations. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview an current research in characterizing, formalizing, classifying, and processing meronymic or partonomic relations (also called part-whole relations in artificial intelligence and application domains). The first part of the chapter investigates the role of knowledge about parts in human cognition, for example, visual perception and conceptual knowledge. The second part describes the classical approach provided by formal mereology and its extensions, which use one single transitive part-of relation, thus focusing an the notion of "part" and neglecting the notion of (something being a) "whole". This limitation leads to classifications of different part-whole relations, one of which is presented in the last part of the chapter.
  12. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.00 
    0.0024706437 = product of:
  0.01976515 = sum of:
    0.01976515 = product of:
      0.0395303 = sum of:
        0.0395303 = weight(_text_:processing in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0395303 = score(doc=1207,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.26835677 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.
  13. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.00 
    0.0024650535 = product of:
  0.019720428 = sum of:
    0.019720428 = product of:
      0.039440855 = sum of:
        0.039440855 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039440855 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  14. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00 
    0.002156922 = product of:
  0.017255375 = sum of:
    0.017255375 = product of:
      0.03451075 = sum of:
        0.03451075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03451075 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  15. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.00 
    0.002156922 = product of:
  0.017255375 = sum of:
    0.017255375 = product of:
      0.03451075 = sum of:
        0.03451075 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03451075 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Pages
    S.22-33
  16. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992) 0.00 
    0.00205887 = product of:
  0.01647096 = sum of:
    0.01647096 = product of:
      0.03294192 = sum of:
        0.03294192 = weight(_text_:processing in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03294192 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.
  17. Thellefsen, M.M.; Thellefsen, T.; Sørensen, B.: Information as signs : a semiotic analysis of the information concept, determining its ontological and epistemological foundations (2018) 0.00 
    0.00205887 = product of:
  0.01647096 = sum of:
    0.01647096 = product of:
      0.03294192 = sum of:
        0.03294192 = weight(_text_:processing in 4241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03294192 = score(doc=4241,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 4241, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4241)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to formulate an analytical framework for the information concept based on the semiotic theory. Design/methodology/approach The paper is motivated by the apparent controversy that still surrounds the information concept. Information, being a key concept within LIS, suffers from being anchored in various incompatible theories. The paper suggests that information is signs, and it demonstrates how the concept of information can be understood within C.S. Peirce's phenomenologically rooted semiotic. Hence, from there, certain ontological conditions as well epistemological consequences of the information concept can be deduced. Findings The paper argues that an understanding of information, as either objective or subjective/discursive, leads to either objective reductionism and signal processing, that fails to explain how information becomes meaningful at all, or conversely, information is understood only relative to subjective/discursive intentions, agendas, etc. To overcome the limitations of defining information as either objective or subjective/discursive, a semiotic analysis shows that information understood as signs is consistently sensitive to both objective and subjective/discursive features of information. It is consequently argued that information as concept should be defined in relation to ontological conditions having certain epistemological consequences. Originality/value The paper presents an analytical framework, derived from semiotics, that adds to the developments of the philosophical dimensions of information within LIS.
  18. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.00 
    0.0015406585 = product of:
  0.012325268 = sum of:
    0.012325268 = product of:
      0.024650536 = sum of:
        0.024650536 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024650536 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  19. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.00 
    0.0015406585 = product of:
  0.012325268 = sum of:
    0.012325268 = product of:
      0.024650536 = sum of:
        0.024650536 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024650536 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  20. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0015406585 = product of:
  0.012325268 = sum of:
    0.012325268 = product of:
      0.024650536 = sum of:
        0.024650536 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024650536 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 6

Themes