Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Eckes, T.: Knowledge structures and knowledge representation : psychological models of conceptual order (1990) 0.01
    0.0060296925 = product of:
      0.04823754 = sum of:
        0.04823754 = weight(_text_:data in 861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04823754 = score(doc=861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.4192326 = fieldWeight in 861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=861)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Conceptual and numerical analysis of data. Proc. of the 13th Conf. of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Augsburg, 10.-12.4.1989. Ed.: O. Opitz
  2. Thiel, C.: ¬Der klassische und der moderne Begriff des Begriffs : Gedanken zur Geschichte der Begriffsbildung in den exakten Wissenschaften (1994) 0.00
    0.0035530303 = product of:
      0.028424243 = sum of:
        0.028424243 = weight(_text_:data in 7868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028424243 = score(doc=7868,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.115061514 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03638826 = queryNorm
            0.24703519 = fieldWeight in 7868, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1620505 = idf(docFreq=5088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7868)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Series
    Studies in classification, data analysis, and knowledge organization
    Source
    Information systems and data analysis: prospects - foundations - applications. Proc. of the 17th Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Kaiserslautern, March 3-5, 1993. Ed.: H.-H. Bock et al
  3. Conceptual structures : theory, tools and applications. 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, Montpellier, France, August, 10-12, 1998, Proceedings (1998) 0.00
    0.0032941918 = product of:
      0.026353534 = sum of:
        0.026353534 = product of:
          0.05270707 = sum of:
            0.05270707 = weight(_text_:processing in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05270707 = score(doc=1378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03638826 = queryNorm
                0.35780904 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS'98, held in Montpellier, France, in August 1998. The 20 revised full papers and 10 research reports presented were carefully selected from a total of 66 submissions; also included are three invited contributions. The volume is divided in topical sections on knowledge representation and knowledge engineering, tools, conceptual graphs and other models, relationships with logics, algorithms and complexity, natural language processing, and applications.
  4. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.00
    0.002156922 = product of:
      0.017255375 = sum of:
        0.017255375 = product of:
          0.03451075 = sum of:
            0.03451075 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03451075 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12742549 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03638826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  5. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992) 0.00
    0.00205887 = product of:
      0.01647096 = sum of:
        0.01647096 = product of:
          0.03294192 = sum of:
            0.03294192 = weight(_text_:processing in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03294192 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14730503 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03638826 = queryNorm
                0.22363065 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.048147 = idf(docFreq=2097, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    In this chapter I propose that frames provide the fundamental representation of knowledge in human cognition. In the first section, I raise problems with the feature list representations often found in theories of knowledge, and I sketch the solutions that frames provide to them. In the second section, I examine the three fundamental concepts of frames: attribute-value sets, structural invariants, and constraints. Because frames also represents the attributes, values, structural invariants, and constraints within a frame, the mechanism that constructs frames builds them recursively. The frame theory I propose borrows heavily from previous frame theories, although its collection of representational components is somewhat unique. Furthermore, frame theorists generally assume that frames are rigid configurations of independent attributes, whereas I propose that frames are dynamic relational structures whose form is flexible and context dependent. In the third section, I illustrate how frames support a wide variety of representational tasks central to conceptual processing in natural and artificial intelligence. Frames can represent exemplars and propositions, prototypes and membership, subordinates and taxonomies. Frames can also represent conceptual combinations, event sequences, rules, and plans. In the fourth section, I show how frames define the extent of conceptual fields and how they provide a powerful productive mechanism for generating specific concepts within a field.