Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.03
    0.03276301 = product of:
      0.06552602 = sum of:
        0.06552602 = sum of:
          0.033960517 = weight(_text_:1997 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033960517 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16924797 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046595894 = queryNorm
              0.2006554 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.6322508 = idf(docFreq=3179, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.031565502 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031565502 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16317087 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046595894 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    A main goal of recent studies in semantics is to integrate into conceptual structures the models of representation used in linguistics, logic, and/or artificial intelligence. A fundamental problem resides in the need to structure knowledge and then to check the validity of constructed representations. We propose associating logical properties with relationships by introducing the relationships into a typed and functional system of specifcations. This makes it possible to compare conceptual representations against the relationships established between the concepts. The mandatory condition to validate such a conceptual representation is consistency. The semantic system proposed is based an a structured set of semantic primitives-types, relations, and properties-based an a global model of language processing, Applicative and Cognitive Grammar (ACG) (Desc16s, 1990), and an extension of this model to terminology (Jouis & Mustafa 1995, 1996, 1997). The ACG postulates three levels of representation of languages, including a cognitive level. At this level, the meanings of lexical predicates are represented by semantic cognitive schemes. From this perspective, we propose a set of semantic concepts, which defines an organized system of meanings. Relations are part of a specification network based an a general terminological scheure (i.e., a coherent system of meanings of relations). In such a system, a specific relation may be characterized as to its: (1) functional type (the semantic type of arguments of the relation); (2) algebraic properties (reflexivity, symmetry, transitivity, etc.); and (3) combinatorial relations with other entities in the same context (for instance, the part of the text where a concept is defined).
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  2. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.011047925 = product of:
      0.02209585 = sum of:
        0.02209585 = product of:
          0.0441917 = sum of:
            0.0441917 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0441917 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16317087 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046595894 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  3. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.007891376 = product of:
      0.015782751 = sum of:
        0.015782751 = product of:
          0.031565502 = sum of:
            0.031565502 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031565502 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16317087 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046595894 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22

Languages