Search (70 results, page 3 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Dahlberg, I.: On the theory of the concept (1979) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 1615) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=1615,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1615, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1615)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Ordering systems for global information networks. Proc. of the 3rd Int. Study Conf. on Classification Research, Bombay 1975
  2. Gödert, W.: Begriffstheorie : Basis einer Theorie von Dokumentationssprachen - Basis zur Erklärung kognitiver Informationsverarbeitung (1996) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 3914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=3914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3914)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
  3. Atran, S.: Basic conceptual domains (1989) 0.01 
    0.005149705 = product of:
  0.02059882 = sum of:
    0.02059882 = weight(_text_:information in 478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02059882 = score(doc=478,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 478, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=478)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
  4. Dahlberg, I.: Conceptual structures and systematization (1995) 0.00 
    0.004855188 = product of:
  0.019420752 = sum of:
    0.019420752 = weight(_text_:information in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019420752 = score(doc=3965,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Examines the nature of knowledge and the relationship between the transfer of knowledge and information communication. Discusses the 3 kinds of relationships existing between concepts: formal; form-categorical; and material relationships, and characteristics of concepts. Concludes with a discussion of conceptual structures for concept definitions, conceptual systematization , concept systematization and functionality, and the analytical, referent-oriented concept theory
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.3, S.9-24
  5. ¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002) 0.00 
    0.004797954 = product of:
  0.019191816 = sum of:
    0.019191816 = weight(_text_:information in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019191816 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  6. Stock, W.: Begriffe und semantische Relationen in der Wissensrepräsentation (2009) 0.00 
    0.0044597755 = product of:
  0.017839102 = sum of:
    0.017839102 = weight(_text_:information in 3218) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017839102 = score(doc=3218,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3218, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3218)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Begriffsorientiertes Information Retrieval bedarf einer informationswissenschaftlichen Theorie der Begriffe sowie der semantischen Relationen. Ein Begriff wird durch seine Intension und Extension sowie durch Definitionen bestimmt. Dem Problem der Vagheit begegnen wir durch die Einführung von Prototypen. Wichtige Definitionsarten sind die Begriffserklärung (nach Aristoteles) und die Definition über Familienähnlichkeiten (im Sinne Wittgensteins). Wir modellieren Begriffe als Frames (in der Version von Barsalou). Die zentrale paradigmatische Relation in Wissensordnungen ist die Hierarchie, die in verschiedene Arten zu gliedern ist: Hyponymie zerfällt in die Taxonomie und die einfache Hyponymie, Meronymie in eine ganze Reihe unterschiedlicher Teil-Ganzes-Beziehungen. Wichtig für praktische Anwendungen ist die Transitivität der jeweiligen Relation. Eine unspezifische Assoziationsrelation ist bei den angepeilten Anwendungen wenig hilfreich und wird durch ein Bündel von generalisierbaren und fachspezifischen Relationen ersetzt. Unser Ansatz fundiert neue Optionen der Anwendung von Wissensordnungen in der Informationspraxis neben ihrem "klassischen" Einsatz beim Information Retrieval: Erweiterung von Suchanfragen (Anwendung der semantischen Nähe), automatisches Schlussfolgern (Anwendung der terminologischen Logik in Vorbereitung eines semantischen Web) und automatische Berechnungen (bei Funktionalbegriffen mit numerischen Wertangaben).
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.8, S.403-420
  7. Barsalou, L.W.: Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields (1992) 0.00 
    0.004425438 = product of:
  0.017701752 = sum of:
    0.017701752 = product of:
      0.035403505 = sum of:
        0.035403505 = weight(_text_:organization in 3217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035403505 = score(doc=3217,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19695997 = fieldWeight in 3217, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3217)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Frames, fields and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization. Eds.: A. Lehrer u. E.F. Kittay
  8. Sprache und Begriff (1970) 0.00 
    0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1224,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1224, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1224)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: LINDNER, I.: Fachsprache: Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Information?; HEINSOHN, G.: Vom Wesen des Begriffs; WERSIG, G.: Begriff und Begriffsinhalt: die Eindeutigkeit und Vieldeutigkeit von Begriffen als Erleichterung oder Erschwerung der Dokumentation; HASENMÜLLER, U.: Begriffe als Bausteine des Dokuments; FISCHER, K.-H.: Begriffs- (Sachverhalts-) Analyse des Dokuments
  9. Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967) 0.00 
    0.0042914203 = product of:
  0.017165681 = sum of:
    0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017165681 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
  10. Wille, R.: Denken in Begriffen : von der griechischen Philosophie bis zur Künstlichen Intelligenz heute (1993) 0.00 
    0.00424829 = product of:
  0.01699316 = sum of:
    0.01699316 = weight(_text_:information in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01699316 = score(doc=3145,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
    Information
  11. Szostak, R.: Complex concepts into basic concepts (2011) 0.00 
    0.0037164795 = product of:
  0.014865918 = sum of:
    0.014865918 = weight(_text_:information in 4926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014865918 = score(doc=4926,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 4926, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4926)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Interdisciplinary communication, and thus the rate of progress in scholarly understanding, would be greatly enhanced if scholars had access to a universal classification of documents or ideas not grounded in particular disciplines or cultures. Such a classification is feasible if complex concepts can be understood as some combination of more basic concepts. There appear to be five main types of concept theory in the philosophical literature. Each provides some support for the idea of breaking complex into basic concepts that can be understood across disciplines or cultures, but each has detractors. None of these criticisms represents a substantive obstacle to breaking complex concepts into basic concepts within information science. Can we take the subject entries in existing universal but discipline-based classifications, and break these into a set of more basic concepts that can be applied across disciplinary classes? The author performs this sort of analysis for Dewey classes 300 to 339.9. This analysis will serve to identify the sort of 'basic concepts' that would lie at the heart of a truly universal classification. There are two key types of basic concept: the things we study (individuals, rocks, trees), and the relationships among these (talking, moving, paying).
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2247-2265
    Theme
    Information
  12. McCray, A.T.; Bodenreider, O.: ¬A conceptual framework for the biomedical domain (2002) 0.00 
    0.0036413912 = product of:
  0.014565565 = sum of:
    0.014565565 = weight(_text_:information in 1207) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014565565 = score(doc=1207,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 1207, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1207)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Specialized domains often come with an extensive terminology, suitable for storing and exchanging information, but not necessarily for knowledge processing. Knowledge structures such as semantic networks, or ontologies, are required to explore the semantics of a domain. The UMLS project at the National Library of Medicine is a research effort to develop knowledge-based resources for the biomedical domain. The Metathesaurus is a large body of knowledge that defines and inter-relates 730,000 biomedical concepts, and the Semantic Network defines the semantic principles that apply to this domain. This chapter presents these two knowledge sources and illustrates through a research study how they can collaborate to further structure the domain. The limits of the approach are discussed.
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  13. Klein, W.: Organisation des Wissens durch Sprache : Konsequenzen für die maschinelle Sprachanalyse (1977) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=1748,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1748, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1748)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Theme
    Information
  14. Pansegrouw, J.G.: ¬Die begrippe spesie, klas en versameling in verhouding tot indekseringteorie (1995) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=4447,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4447, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4447)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    South African journal of library and information science. 63(1995) no.4, S.173-178
  15. Kageura, K.: Terminological semantics : an examination of 'concept' and 'meaning' in the study of terms (1995) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 4561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=4561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 20(1995) no.4, S.25-31
  16. Cruse, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties (2002) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=1186,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1186, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1186)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  17. Green, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics (2002) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 1193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=1193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1193)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  18. Gerstenkorn, A.: Informationsbezug zwischen Gemein- und Fachsprache : Zum gemein- und fachsprachlichen Wort "Tal" (2006) 0.00 
    0.0034331365 = product of:
  0.013732546 = sum of:
    0.013732546 = weight(_text_:information in 6013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013732546 = score(doc=6013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 6013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6013)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.5, S.259-267
  19. Fellbaum, C.: On the semantics of troponymy (2002) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=1191,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1191, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1191)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
  20. Guarino, N.; Welty, C.: Identity and subsumption (2002) 0.00 
    0.0030039945 = product of:
  0.012015978 = sum of:
    0.012015978 = weight(_text_:information in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012015978 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.050415643 = queryNorm
        0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Information science and knowledge management; vol.3

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 17
  • nl 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 58
  • m 7
  • s 4
  • el 2
  • n 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications