Search (143 results, page 3 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Altmann, G.; Beöthy, E.; Best, K.-H.: ¬Die Bedeutungskomplexität der Wörter und das Menzerathsche Gesetz (1982) 0.00 
    0.0020759143 = product of:
  0.031138714 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 5933) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=5933,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 5933, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5933)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung. 35(1982) S.537-543
  2. Seiler, T.B.: Sind Begriffe nur zum Reden und beim Reden da? (1994) 0.00 
    0.0020759143 = product of:
  0.031138714 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 8935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=8935,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 8935, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8935)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Grundfragen und Aufgaben. Hrsg.: R. Wille u. M. Zickwolff
  3. Hahn, A.: Begriffe, Konzeptionen und Beispiele (1996) 0.00 
    0.0020759143 = product of:
  0.031138714 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 3922) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=3922,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 3922, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3922)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.28-30
  4. Winograd, T.: ¬Ein prozedurales Modell des Sprachverstehens (1977) 0.00 
    0.0020759143 = product of:
  0.031138714 = sum of:
    0.031138714 = weight(_text_:und in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031138714 = score(doc=4707,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Series
    Grundlagen der Kommunikation und Kognition
    Source
    Semantik und künstliche Intelligenz: Beiträge zur automatischen Sprachbearbeitung II. Hrsg. u. eingeleitet von P. Eisenberg
  5. Fachsprachentheorie : Bd.1: Fachsprachliche Terminologie, Begriffs- und Sachsysteme, Methodologie; Bd.2: Konzeptionen und theoretische Richtungen; Bd.3: Auswahlbibliographie & Indices (1993-94) 0.00 
    0.00194184 = product of:
  0.0291276 = sum of:
    0.0291276 = weight(_text_:und in 2951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0291276 = score(doc=2951,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.4535172 = fieldWeight in 2951, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2951)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die folgenden Beiträge: FELBER, H.: Fachsprache aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; BUDIN, G.: Terminologie und Fachkommunikation; HOHNHOLD, I.: Fachsprache konstituierende Gegenstände, Vorgänge, Maßnahmen und Strukturen: auf dem Weg von Begriffen und Benennungen zum Fachtext; ARNTZ, R. u. E. EYDAM: Zum Verhältnis von Sprach- und Sachwissen beim Übersetzen von Fachtexten; GUNNARSON, B.-L.: Fachsprachen und soziolinguistische Theorien: eine Untersuchung über ihre Relevanz für die Fachsprachenforschung; BORNETO, C.S.: Gebrauchsanweisungen: Ansätze zu einer Theorie der Subtexte; SAGER, J.C.: The position of special languages between natural and artificial languages
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.00 
    0.0019186425 = product of:
  0.0143898185 = sum of:
    0.007863713 = weight(_text_:und in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007863713 = score(doc=3461,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
    0.0065261046 = product of:
      0.013052209 = sum of:
        0.013052209 = weight(_text_:information in 3461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013052209 = score(doc=3461,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.256578 = fieldWeight in 3461, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Concept theory is an extremely broad, interdisciplinary and complex field of research related to many deep fields with very long historical traditions without much consensus. However, information science and knowledge organization cannot avoid relating to theories of concepts. Knowledge organizing systems (e.g., classification systems, thesauri, and ontologies) should be understood as systems basically organizing concepts and their semantic relations. The same is the case with information retrieval systems. Different theories of concepts have different implications for how to construe, evaluate, and use such systems. Based on a post-Kuhnian view of paradigms, this article put forward arguments that the best understanding and classification of theories of concepts is to view and classify them in accordance with epistemological theories (empiricism, rationalism, historicism, and pragmatism). It is also argued that the historicist and pragmatist understandings of concepts are the most fruitful views and that this understanding may be part of a broader paradigm shift that is also beginning to take place in information science. The importance of historicist and pragmatic theories of concepts for information science is outlined.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1519-1536
    Theme
    Information
  7. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0018783542 = product of:
  0.028175311 = sum of:
    0.028175311 = sum of:
      0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008544678 = score(doc=5588,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
      0.019630633 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.019630633 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.101476215 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.028978055 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    To organize information, librarians create structures. These structures grow from a logic that goes back at least as far as Aristotle. It is the basis of classification as we practice it, and thesauri and subject headings have developed from it. Feminist critiques of logic suggest that logic is gendered in nature. This article will explore how these critiques play out in contemporary standards for the organization of information. Our widely used classification schemes embody principles such as hierarchical force that conform to traditional/Aristotelian logic. Our subject heading strings follow a linear path of subdivision. Our thesauri break down subjects into discrete concepts. In thesauri and subject heading lists we privilege hierarchical relationships, reflected in the syndetic structure of broader and narrower terms, over all other relationships. Are our classificatory and syndetic structures gendered? Are there other options? Carol Gilligan's In a Different Voice (1982), Women's Ways of Knowing (Belenky, Clinchy, Goldberger, & Tarule, 1986), and more recent related research suggest a different type of structure for women's knowledge grounded in "connected knowing." This article explores current and potential elements of connected knowing in subject access with a focus on the relationships, both paradigmatic and syntagmatic, between concepts.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft 'Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services'.
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22
  8. Nacke, O.: Über den Gebrauch des Wortes 'Begriff' (1977) 0.00 
    0.0018756052 = product of:
  0.028134076 = sum of:
    0.028134076 = weight(_text_:und in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028134076 = score(doc=1523,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Der Ausdruck 'Begriff' wird mit unterschiedlichen Bedeutungen gebraucht. Zur Ordnung und Typisierung werden drei Bereiche genannt: die Sprache, das Denken und das Sein und entsprechend vier Definitionstypen unterschieden: den semantischen, den psychologischen, den ontologischen und den Mischtyp. Erläuterung dieser Typen und erkenntnistheoretischer Hinweis
  9. Szagun, G.: Sprachentwicklung beim Kind : eine Einführung (1993) 0.00 
    0.0018160468 = product of:
  0.027240701 = sum of:
    0.027240701 = weight(_text_:und in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027240701 = score(doc=26,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Dieses Lehrbuch zur Psychologie der Sprachentwicklung zeigt vor allem die Einflüsse der Generativen Transformationsgrammatik und der psychologischen Arbeiten zur Semantik auf die Vorstellungen zum Erwerb morphologischer, syntaktischer, semantischer und pragmatischer Komponenten der Sprachbeherrschung nach. Die Darstellung ist exakt und weitgehend vollständig, allerdings hat es der Leser mit der etwas spröden Art der Darstellung nicht immer leicht
  10. Elling, E.: Darstellung der Entwicklung klassifikatorischer Fähigkeiten im Rahmen der Piagetschen Theorie (1985) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=1236,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Studien zur Klassifikation, Systematik und Terminologie: Theorie und Praxis. Akten der 6. Arbeitstagung des Münsteraner Arbeitskreises für Semiotik, Münster, 25.-26.9.1984
  11. Endruweit, G.: Probleme sozialwissenschaftlicher Begriffsbildung (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3913,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3913, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3913)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Footnote
    Metakritik zu den Erwiderung auf: Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften: lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? und der Replik von I. Dahlberg
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.65-67
  12. Eckes, T.: Wissenschaftliche Begriffsbildung und das Problem der induktiven Ambiguität (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3920,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.21-23
  13. Lütge, C.: Begriffskultur als Nächstenliebe? : Nutzen und Relevanz von Klassifikationen (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3929,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3929, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3929)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.42-44
  14. Manhart, K.: Zur Rolle von Theorie und Formalisierung bei der Begriffsbildung (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3930) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3930,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3930, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3930)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.44-46
  15. Radermacher, F.J.: Stabilität und Variabilität von Begriffssystemen : einige Anmerkungen zu einem Text von Ingetraut Dahlberg (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3934)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.53-55
  16. Seiler, T.B.: Bemerkungen zur Begriffstheorie und zur Begriffsethik (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 3937) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=3937,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 3937, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3937)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Source
    Ethik und Sozialwissenschaften. 7(1996) H.1, S.60-63
  17. Begriffsgeschichte und Diskursgeschichte : Methodenfragen und Forschungsergebnisse der historischen Semantik (1994) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 6088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=6088,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 6088, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6088)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
  18. Damasio, A.R.; Damasio, H.: Sprache und Gehirn (1992) 0.00 
    0.0017793552 = product of:
  0.026690327 = sum of:
    0.026690327 = weight(_text_:und in 4168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026690327 = score(doc=4168,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.41556883 = fieldWeight in 4168, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4168)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Abstract
    Eine ganze Batterie neuronaler Strukturen dient der Darstellung von Begriffen, eine kleinere findet Wörter und bildet Sätze daraus; als wichtige Instanz vermittelt eine dritte zwischen den anderen beiden.
  19. Ausgewählte Texte zur Terminologie (1993) 0.00 
    0.0017387326 = product of:
  0.026080986 = sum of:
    0.026080986 = weight(_text_:und in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026080986 = score(doc=5650,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
  0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: WÜSTER, E.: Terminologielehre; HAJUTIN, A.D.: Die verschiedenen Richtungen in der Terminologiearbeit; KOCOUREK, R.: Der Terminus und seine Definition; DROZD, L.: Zum Gegenstand und zur Methode der Terminologielehre; HORECKY, J.: Zu Bedeutungsbeziehungen zwischen den terminologischen Benennungen; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Spezifik des spezialsprachlichen Wortschatzes gegenüber dem allgemeinen Wortschatz; FILIPEC, J.: Zur Frage des Systems in der Terminologie; REFORMATSKIJ, A.A.: Was ist eine Benennung und was ist Terminologie?; SUPERANSKAJA, A.V.: Theoretische Terminologiearbeit; ZHURAVLEV, V.F. u. G.G. SAMBUROVA: Philosophisch-logische Aspekte der Terminologieregelung und -normung; ZHURAVLEV, V.F.: Einige logisch-methodologische Fragen der Regelung des Begriffsapparates und von Terminologien; NALEPIN, V.L.: Begriffsarten und Definitionsstruktur; WÜSTER, E.: Das Worten der Welt, schaubildlich und terminologisch dargestellt; WÜSTER, E.: Die Allgemeine Terminologielehre: ein Grenzgebiet zwischen Sprachwissenschaft, Logik, Ontologie, Informatik und den Sachwissenschaften; FELBER, H.: Einige Grundfragen der Terminologiewissenschaft aus der Sicht der Allgemeinen Terminologielehre; COLE, W.D.: Terminologie: Grundsätze und Methoden; SCHULZE, E.: Der Terminus: Eigenschaften und Wesen sowie seine Abgrenzung von anderen Lexemarten; PICHT, H.: Fachsprachliche Phraseologie; OESER, E.: Terminologie als Voraussetzung der Wissenstechnik; BUDIN, G., C. GALINSKI, W. NEDOBITY u. R. THALLER: Terminologie und die Wissensverarbeitung; PICHT, H. u. C. LAURÉN: Vergleich der terminologischen Schulen
  20. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.00 
    0.0017062648 = product of:
  0.012796985 = sum of:
    0.007863713 = weight(_text_:und in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.007863713 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06422601 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028978055 = queryNorm
        0.12243814 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
    0.0049332716 = product of:
      0.009866543 = sum of:
        0.009866543 = weight(_text_:information in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009866543 = score(doc=2033,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    Abstract
    Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.7, S.1367-1373
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 100
  • e 40
  • m 1
  • nl 1
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 113
  • m 20
  • s 7
  • el 2
  • n 2
  • p 2
  • d 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications