Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.05 
    0.05284988 = product of:
  0.10569976 = sum of:
    0.10569976 = sum of:
      0.06326529 = weight(_text_:p in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06326529 = score(doc=3060,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.33707932 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
      0.042434476 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.042434476 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Alon Friedman und Richard P. Smiraglia kündigen in ihrem aktuellen Artikel "Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization" an, eine "empirical demonstration of how the domain [of knowledge organisation] itself understands the meaning of a concept" durchzuführen. Die Klärung des Konzeptbegriffs ist ein begrüßenswertes Vorhaben, das die Autoren in einer empirischen Untersuchung von concept maps (also Konzeptdiagrammen) aus dem Bereich der Wissensorganisation nachvollziehen wollen. Beschränkte sich Friedman 2011 in seinem Artikel "Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization" [Fn 01] noch ausschließlich auf Sprache als Medium im Zeichenprozess, bezieht er sich nun auf Visualisierungen als Repräsentationsform und scheint somit seinen Ansatz um den Aspekt der Bildlichkeit zu erweitern. Zumindest erwartet man dies nach der Lektüre der Beschreibung des aktuellen Vorhabens von Friedman und Smiraglia, das - wie die Autoren verkünden - auf einer semiotischen Grundlage durchgeführt worden sei.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.libreas.eu/09treude.htm. Bezug zu: Alon Friedman, Richard P. Smiraglia, (2013): Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization. In: Journal of Documentation, Vol. 69/1, S.27-48.
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  2. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.05 
    0.050849043 = product of:
  0.101698086 = sum of:
    0.101698086 = sum of:
      0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.052191198 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
      0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04950689 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  3. Working with conceptual structures : contributions to ICCS 2000. 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues. Darmstadt, August 14-18, 2000 (2000) 0.03 
    0.033087373 = sum of:
  0.010487921 = product of:
    0.041951682 = sum of:
      0.041951682 = weight(_text_:authors in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.041951682 = score(doc=5089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.17628889 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.022599453 = product of:
    0.045198906 = sum of:
      0.045198906 = weight(_text_:p in 5089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045198906 = score(doc=5089,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.052200247 = queryNorm
          0.24082111 = fieldWeight in 5089, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
            0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=5089)
    0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures - Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues (ICCS 2000) brings together a wide range of researchers and practitioners working with conceptual structures. During the last few years, the ICCS conference series has considerably widened its scope on different kinds of conceptual structures, stimulating research across domain boundaries. We hope that this stimulation is further enhanced by ICCS 2000 joining the long tradition of conferences in Darmstadt with extensive, lively discussions. This volume consists of contributions presented at ICCS 2000, complementing the volume "Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues" (B. Ganter, G.W. Mineau (Eds.), LNAI 1867, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 2000). It contains submissions reviewed by the program committee, and position papers. We wish to express our appreciation to all the authors of submitted papers, to the general chair, the program chair, the editorial board, the program committee, and to the additional reviewers for making ICCS 2000 a valuable contribution in the knowledge processing research field. Special thanks go to the local organizers for making the conference an enjoyable and inspiring event. We are grateful to Darmstadt University of Technology, the Ernst Schröder Center for Conceptual Knowledge Processing, the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Technology, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Land Hessen, and NaviCon GmbH for their generous support
    Content
    Concepts & Language: Knowledge organization by procedures of natural language processing. A case study using the method GABEK (J. Zelger, J. Gadner) - Computer aided narrative analysis using conceptual graphs (H. Schärfe, P. 0hrstrom) - Pragmatic representation of argumentative text: a challenge for the conceptual graph approach (H. Irandoust, B. Moulin) - Conceptual graphs as a knowledge representation core in a complex language learning environment (G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, S. Boycheva, T. Nikolov) - Conceptual Modeling and Ontologies: Relationships and actions in conceptual categories (Ch. Landauer, K.L. Bellman) - Concept approximations for formal concept analysis (J. Saquer, J.S. Deogun) - Faceted information representation (U. Priß) - Simple concept graphs with universal quantifiers (J. Tappe) - A framework for comparing methods for using or reusing multiple ontologies in an application (J. van ZyI, D. Corbett) - Designing task/method knowledge-based systems with conceptual graphs (M. Leclère, F.Trichet, Ch. Choquet) - A logical ontology (J. Farkas, J. Sarbo) - Algorithms and Tools: Fast concept analysis (Ch. Lindig) - A framework for conceptual graph unification (D. Corbett) - Visual CP representation of knowledge (H.D. Pfeiffer, R.T. Hartley) - Maximal isojoin for representing software textual specifications and detecting semantic anomalies (Th. Charnois) - Troika: using grids, lattices and graphs in knowledge acquisition (H.S. Delugach, B.E. Lampkin) - Open world theorem prover for conceptual graphs (J.E. Heaton, P. Kocura) - NetCare: a practical conceptual graphs software tool (S. Polovina, D. Strang) - CGWorld - a web based workbench for conceptual graphs management and applications (P. Dobrev, K. Toutanova) - Position papers: The edition project: Peirce's existential graphs (R. Mülller) - Mining association rules using formal concept analysis (N. Pasquier) - Contextual logic summary (R Wille) - Information channels and conceptual scaling (K.E. Wolff) - Spatial concepts - a rule exploration (S. Rudolph) - The TEXT-TO-ONTO learning environment (A. Mädche, St. Staab) - Controlling the semantics of metadata on audio-visual documents using ontologies (Th. Dechilly, B. Bachimont) - Building the ontological foundations of a terminology from natural language to conceptual graphs with Ribosome, a knowledge extraction system (Ch. Jacquelinet, A. Burgun) - CharGer: some lessons learned and new directions (H.S. Delugach) - Knowledge management using conceptual graphs (W.K. Pun)
  4. Zawada, B.; Swanepoel, P.: On the empirical adequacy of terminological concept theories : the case for prototype theory (1994) 0.03 
    0.029823542 = product of:
  0.059647083 = sum of:
    0.059647083 = product of:
      0.11929417 = sum of:
        0.11929417 = weight(_text_:p in 2004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11929417 = score(doc=2004,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.63560283 = fieldWeight in 2004, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2004)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  5. Rahmstorf, G.: ¬An integrated conceptual representation for words and phrases (1992) 0.03 
    0.026360538 = product of:
  0.052721076 = sum of:
    0.052721076 = product of:
      0.10544215 = sum of:
        0.10544215 = weight(_text_:p in 2415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10544215 = score(doc=2415,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.5617989 = fieldWeight in 2415, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2415)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Discourse and lexical meaning. Proceedings of a Workshop of the DFG Sonderforschungsbereich 340, Stuttgart, 30.11.-1.12.1992. Ed.: P. Bosch u. P. Gerstl
  6. Winograd, T.: ¬Ein prozedurales Modell des Sprachverstehens (1977) 0.03 
    0.026095599 = product of:
  0.052191198 = sum of:
    0.052191198 = product of:
      0.104382396 = sum of:
        0.104382396 = weight(_text_:p in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104382396 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.55615246 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Semantik und künstliche Intelligenz: Beiträge zur automatischen Sprachbearbeitung II. Hrsg. u. eingeleitet von P. Eisenberg
  7. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.02 
    0.024753446 = product of:
  0.04950689 = sum of:
    0.04950689 = product of:
      0.09901378 = sum of:
        0.09901378 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09901378 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.9-22
  8. Rahmstorf, G.: Methoden und Formate für mehrsprachige Begriffssysteme (1996) 0.02 
    0.022367656 = product of:
  0.044735312 = sum of:
    0.044735312 = product of:
      0.089470625 = sum of:
        0.089470625 = weight(_text_:p in 7110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089470625 = score(doc=7110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 7110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    p
  9. Schimany, P.: Vom 'Chaos der denkender Ordnung' zu einer 'Ethik statischer Begriffssysteme' (1996) 0.02 
    0.022367656 = product of:
  0.044735312 = sum of:
    0.044735312 = product of:
      0.089470625 = sum of:
        0.089470625 = weight(_text_:p in 3936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.089470625 = score(doc=3936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.47670212 = fieldWeight in 3936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3936)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  10. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.02 
    0.021217238 = product of:
  0.042434476 = sum of:
    0.042434476 = product of:
      0.08486895 = sum of:
        0.08486895 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08486895 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  11. Weissenhofer, P.: Conceptology in terminology : theory, semantics, and word-formation. A morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminology (1995) 0.01 
    0.014911771 = product of:
  0.029823542 = sum of:
    0.029823542 = product of:
      0.059647083 = sum of:
        0.059647083 = weight(_text_:p in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059647083 = score(doc=4632,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.31780142 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  12. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01 
    0.014144826 = product of:
  0.028289651 = sum of:
    0.028289651 = product of:
      0.056579303 = sum of:
        0.056579303 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056579303 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  13. Wille, R.: Denken in Begriffen : von der griechischen Philosophie bis zur Künstlichen Intelligenz heute (1993) 0.01 
    0.0130477995 = product of:
  0.026095599 = sum of:
    0.026095599 = product of:
      0.052191198 = sum of:
        0.052191198 = weight(_text_:p in 3145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052191198 = score(doc=3145,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.27807623 = fieldWeight in 3145, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3145)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    p
  14. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01 
    0.012376723 = product of:
  0.024753446 = sum of:
    0.024753446 = product of:
      0.04950689 = sum of:
        0.04950689 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04950689 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Pages
    S.22-33
  15. Dahlberg, I.: Zur 'Begriffskultur' in den Sozialwissenschaften : lassen sich ihre Probleme lösen? (1996) 0.01 
    0.011183828 = product of:
  0.022367656 = sum of:
    0.022367656 = product of:
      0.044735312 = sum of:
        0.044735312 = weight(_text_:p in 3941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044735312 = score(doc=3941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Footnote
    Dazu im selben Heft Erwiderungen von: J. Becker u. A. Reiss, W.L. Bühl, V. Dreier, R. Dürr, T. Eckes, W. Friedlmeier, W. Gödert, A. Hahn, H. Kerber, R. Kleinknecht, J. Klüver, J. Krause, S. Lamnek, M.-T. Liske, C. Lütge, R. Meyers, K. Manhart, H.P. Ohly, M. Patzak, R. Popp, F.J. Radermacher, A. Ros, P. Schimany, T.B. Seiler, A. Suchanek, E. Walther-Klaus, H. Weiss; eine Erwiderung von I. Dahlberg u. eine Metakritik von G. Endruweit. - Replik der Verfasserin auf die Erwiderungen: S.67-85
  16. Felgner, U.: ¬Die Begriffe der Äquivalenz, der Gleichheit und der Identität (2020) 0.01 
    0.011183828 = product of:
  0.022367656 = sum of:
    0.022367656 = product of:
      0.044735312 = sum of:
        0.044735312 = weight(_text_:p in 348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044735312 = score(doc=348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=348)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    "Der Begriff der Gleichheit ist uns Mathematikern vielleicht der geläufigste; dennoch läßt sich schwer sagen, was wir unter ihm verstehen." - Mit diesem Satz beginnt GERHARD HESSENBERG sein Buch über die .Grundlagen der Geometrie' ([24], Berlin, 1930, §1). Er kommt nach einer ausführlichen Diskussion zum Schluß, daß die Relation der Gleichheit nichts anderes als eine Äquivalenzrelation sei, also eine symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation, und daß auch umgekehrt jede symmetrische, transitive und reflexive Relation eine Gleichheitsbeziehung sei. Die Begriffe Gleichheit und Äquivalenz wären demnach synonym. Schaut man im .Mathematischen Wörterbuch' von J. NAAS & H.L. SCHMID (Berlin, 1967) nach, so findet man unter dem Stichwort Gleichheit (p. 639) genau dieselbe Definition: "Die Gleichheit ist eine Äquivalenzrelation und umgekehrt kann jede Äquivalenzrelation als eine besondere Art von Gleichheit aufgefaßt werden."
  17. Pathak, L.P.: Concept-term relationship and a classified schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' (2000) 0.01 
    0.010487921 = product of:
  0.020975841 = sum of:
    0.020975841 = product of:
      0.083903365 = sum of:
        0.083903365 = weight(_text_:authors in 6046) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083903365 = score(doc=6046,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.23797122 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6046, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6046)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Draws attention to the efforts to define the terms 'concept' and 'term' and suggests a schedule of isolates for the term 'concept' under eight headings: 0. Concept; 1. Theoretical aspects; 2. Learning theory and Psychological aspects; 3. Origin, evolution, formation, construction; 4. Semantic aspects; 5.Terms and Terminology; 6. Usage and discipline-specific applications; and 7. Concepts and ISAR systems. The schedule also includes about 150 aspects/isolate terms related to 'concept' along with the name of the authors who have used them. The schedule is intended to help in identifying the various aspects of a concept with the help of the terms used for them. These aspects may guide to some extent, in dissecting and seeing the social science concepts from various point of views
  18. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.01 
    0.009319857 = product of:
  0.018639714 = sum of:
    0.018639714 = product of:
      0.037279427 = sum of:
        0.037279427 = weight(_text_:p in 2033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037279427 = score(doc=2033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18768665 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2033)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Much of the literature of information science and knowledge organization has accepted and built upon Elaine Svenonius's (2004) claim that "paradigmatic relationships are those that are context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds" (p. 583). At the same time, the literature demonstrates a common understanding that paradigmatic relations are the kinds of semantic relations used in thesauri and other knowledge organization systems (including equivalence relations, hierarchical relations, and associative relations). This understanding is problematic and harmful because it directs attention away from the empirical and contextual basis for knowledge-organizing systems. Whether A is a kind of X is certainly not context-free and definitional in empirical sciences or in much everyday information. Semantic relations are theory-dependent and, in biology, for example, a scientific revolution has taken place in which many relations have changed following the new taxonomic paradigm named "cladism." This biological example is not an exception, but the norm. Semantic relations including paradigmatic relations are not a priori but are dependent on subject knowledge, scientific findings, and paradigms. As long as information scientists and knowledge organizers isolate themselves from subject knowledge, knowledge organization cannot possibly progress.
  19. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01 
    0.008840516 = product of:
  0.017681032 = sum of:
    0.017681032 = product of:
      0.035362065 = sum of:
        0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035362065 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  20. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01 
    0.008840516 = product of:
  0.017681032 = sum of:
    0.017681032 = product of:
      0.035362065 = sum of:
        0.035362065 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035362065 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18279637 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052200247 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 11

Types

Themes