Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Begriffstheorie"
  1. Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014) 0.08
    0.07588121 = product of:
      0.15176243 = sum of:
        0.15176243 = sum of:
          0.11537294 = weight(_text_:word in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11537294 = score(doc=1440,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.40962988 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
          0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.036389478 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05371688 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The aim of this paper is to analyze the Gottlob Frege's (1848-1925) theory of definition as a tool for knowledge organization. The objective was achieved by discussing the theory of definition including: the aims of definition, kinds of definition, condition of correct definition, what is undefinable. Frege indicated the following aims of a defining: (1) to introduce a new word, which has had no precise meaning until then (2) to explain the meaning of a word; (3) to catch a thought. We would like to present three kinds of definitions used by Frege: a contextual definition, a stipulative definition and a piecemeal definition. In the history of theory of definition Frege was the first to have formulated the condition of a correct definition. According to Frege not everything can be defined, what is logically simple cannot have a proper definition Usability of Frege's theory of definition is referred in the case study. Definitions that serve as an example are definitions of 'context'. The term 'context' is used in different situations and meanings in the field of knowledge organization. The paper is rounded by a discussion of how Frege's theory of definition can be useful for knowledge organization. To present G. Frege's theory of definition in view of the need for knowledge organization we shall start with different ranges of knowledge organization.
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  2. Weissenhofer, P.: Conceptology in terminology : theory, semantics, and word-formation. A morpho-conceptually based approach to classification as exemplified by the English baseball terminology (1995) 0.05
    0.046149176 = product of:
      0.09229835 = sum of:
        0.09229835 = product of:
          0.1845967 = sum of:
            0.1845967 = weight(_text_:word in 4632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1845967 = score(doc=4632,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.6554078 = fieldWeight in 4632, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4632)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This dissertation from the University of Vienna contains the following chapters: (1) Conceptological aspects in terminology theory. Post-Wüsterian sign models and the four-field model. Vagueness, prototypes, and the four-field model. Morphological aspects of terminology and prototype theory. Word-formation and its role in terminology theory and conceptology. (2) A morpho-conceptual classification system of the English baseball terminology. The classification system. Statistical results. Conclusions
  3. O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017) 0.03
    0.03461188 = product of:
      0.06922376 = sum of:
        0.06922376 = product of:
          0.13844752 = sum of:
            0.13844752 = weight(_text_:word in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13844752 = score(doc=3835,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.28165168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.49155584 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.2432623 = idf(docFreq=634, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Word aboutness is defined as the relationship between words and subjects associated with them. An aboutness coefficient is developed to estimate the strength of the aboutness relationship. Words that are randomly distributed across subjects are assumed to lack aboutness and the degree to which their usage deviates from a random pattern indicates the strength of the aboutness. To estimate aboutness, title words and their associated subjects are extracted from the titles of non-fiction English language books in the OCLC WorldCat database. The usage patterns of the title words are analyzed and used to compute aboutness coefficients for each of the common title words. Words with low aboutness coefficients (An and In) are commonly found in stop word lists, whereas words with high aboutness coefficients (Carbonate, Autism) are unambiguous and have a strong subject association. The aboutness coefficient potentially can enhance indexing, advance authority control, and improve retrieval.
  4. Dahlberg, I.: ¬Die gegenstandsbezogene, analytische Begriffstheorie und ihre Definitionsarten (1987) 0.03
    0.025472634 = product of:
      0.050945267 = sum of:
        0.050945267 = product of:
          0.101890534 = sum of:
            0.101890534 = weight(_text_:22 in 880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101890534 = score(doc=880,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 880, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=880)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.9-22
  5. Wüster, E.: Begriffs- und Themaklassifikation : Unterschiede in ihrem Wesen und in ihrer Anwendung (1971) 0.02
    0.021833686 = product of:
      0.043667372 = sum of:
        0.043667372 = product of:
          0.087334745 = sum of:
            0.087334745 = weight(_text_:22 in 3904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.087334745 = score(doc=3904,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3904, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3904)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 22(1971) H.3, S.98-104 (T.1); H.4, S.143-150 (T.2)
  6. Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010) 0.01
    0.014555791 = product of:
      0.029111583 = sum of:
        0.029111583 = product of:
          0.058223166 = sum of:
            0.058223166 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058223166 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  7. Storms, G.; VanMechelen, I.; DeBoeck, P.: Structural-analysis of the intension and extension of semantic concepts (1994) 0.01
    0.012736317 = product of:
      0.025472634 = sum of:
        0.025472634 = product of:
          0.050945267 = sum of:
            0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 2574) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050945267 = score(doc=2574,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2574, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2574)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2000 19:17:40
  8. Bauer, G.: ¬Die vielseitigen Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Kategorienprinzips bei der Wissensorganisation (2006) 0.01
    0.012736317 = product of:
      0.025472634 = sum of:
        0.025472634 = product of:
          0.050945267 = sum of:
            0.050945267 = weight(_text_:22 in 5710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050945267 = score(doc=5710,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5710, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5710)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Pages
    S.22-33
  9. Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013) 0.01
    0.010916843 = product of:
      0.021833686 = sum of:
        0.021833686 = product of:
          0.043667372 = sum of:
            0.043667372 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043667372 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
  10. Jouis, C.: Logic of relationships (2002) 0.01
    0.009097369 = product of:
      0.018194739 = sum of:
        0.018194739 = product of:
          0.036389478 = sum of:
            0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 1204) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036389478 = score(doc=1204,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1204, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1204)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    1.12.2002 11:12:22
  11. Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012) 0.01
    0.009097369 = product of:
      0.018194739 = sum of:
        0.018194739 = product of:
          0.036389478 = sum of:
            0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036389478 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2012 13:11:25
  12. Olson, H.A.: How we construct subjects : a feminist analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.009097369 = product of:
      0.018194739 = sum of:
        0.018194739 = product of:
          0.036389478 = sum of:
            0.036389478 = weight(_text_:22 in 5588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036389478 = score(doc=5588,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18810736 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05371688 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5588, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5588)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    11.12.2019 19:00:22