Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"Elektronisches Publizieren"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Davis, P.M.; Solla, L.R.: ¬An IP-level analysis of usage statistics for electronic journals in chemistry : making inferences about user behavior (2003) 0.01
    0.01222006 = product of:
      0.07332036 = sum of:
        0.07332036 = weight(_text_:relationship in 1823) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07332036 = score(doc=1823,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2292412 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047513504 = queryNorm
            0.31983936 = fieldWeight in 1823, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.824759 = idf(docFreq=964, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1823)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This study reports an analysis of American Chemical Society electronic journal downloads at Cornell University by individual IP addresses. While the majority of users (IPs) limited themselves to a small number of both journals and article downloads, a small minority of heavy users had a large effect an total journal downloads. There was a very strong relationship between the number of article downloads and the number of users, implying that a user-population can be estimated by just knowing the total use of a journal. Aggregate users (i.e. Library Proxy Server and public library computers) can be regarded as a sample of the entire user population. Analysis of article downloads by format (PDF versus HTML) suggests that individuals are using the system like a networked photocopier, for the purposes of creating print-on-demand copies of articles.