Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.04
    0.042576324 = product of:
      0.08515265 = sum of:
        0.08515265 = product of:
          0.1703053 = sum of:
            0.1703053 = weight(_text_:j.c in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.1703053 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3322337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.5126069 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.627983 = idf(docFreq=158, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  2. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.013582738 = product of:
      0.027165476 = sum of:
        0.027165476 = product of:
          0.054330952 = sum of:
            0.054330952 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054330952 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
  3. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.011884895 = product of:
      0.02376979 = sum of:
        0.02376979 = product of:
          0.04753958 = sum of:
            0.04753958 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04753958 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1755324 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
  4. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.01
    0.010071151 = product of:
      0.020142302 = sum of:
        0.020142302 = product of:
          0.08056921 = sum of:
            0.08056921 = weight(_text_:authors in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08056921 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
  5. Millsap, L.; Ferl, T.E.: Search patterns of remote users : an analysis of OPAC transaction logs (1993) 0.01
    0.010071151 = product of:
      0.020142302 = sum of:
        0.020142302 = product of:
          0.08056921 = sum of:
            0.08056921 = weight(_text_:authors in 6038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08056921 = score(doc=6038,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 6038, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6038)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The focus of this study is the search behavior of remote users of the University of California MELVYL Library System, an OPAC. Transaction logs from randomly selected remote user search sessions are analyzed. Descriptive data on the number and type of searches, choice of search mode and database, number of retrievals, number and type of errors, and use of system HELP facilities are presented. The search data have been cross-tabulated with demographic data on the same group of remote users, collected through an online survey conducted by the authors. Effectiveness of system usage is discussed. A case mode is made for the desirability of additional heuristics in the catalog portion of the system
  6. Lundgren, J.; Simpson, B.: Cataloging needs survey for faculty at the University of Florida (1997) 0.01
    0.010071151 = product of:
      0.020142302 = sum of:
        0.020142302 = product of:
          0.08056921 = sum of:
            0.08056921 = weight(_text_:authors in 508) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08056921 = score(doc=508,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22851472 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05012591 = queryNorm
                0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 508, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=508)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey of lecturers and students, at Florida University at Gainesville, to determine the degree to which the information provided in catalogue records serve the needs of library users and the usefulness of including and displaying typical elements of catalogue records. Results indicate the highest level of agreement with usefulness of: title; primary author; date; subjects; other authors; and series. There were moderately high levels of agreement for: summary notes; contents notes; standard numbers; publisher; pagination; and related titles; and lower levels of agreement for reference notes; place of publication; index notes; illustrations; and size