Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Smrzka, B.: ¬Der Web-OPAC der Büchereien Wien : Usability Untersuchung (2003) 0.05
    0.052354436 = product of:
      0.10470887 = sum of:
        0.10470887 = product of:
          0.20941775 = sum of:
            0.20941775 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20941775 = score(doc=2275,freq=7.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                1.0764824 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                    7.0 = termFreq=7.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2003, Nr.77, S.43 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 56(2003) H.3/4]
    Year
    2003
  2. Diepolder, S.: Was ist eine Köperschaft? : Umfrage zur Opac-Nutzung an der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen (2003) 0.03
    0.029498382 = product of:
      0.058996763 = sum of:
        0.058996763 = product of:
          0.117993526 = sum of:
            0.117993526 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.117993526 = score(doc=2103,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.6065291 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    BuB. 55(2003) H.1, S.28-30
    Year
    2003
  3. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.012146326 = product of:
      0.024292652 = sum of:
        0.024292652 = product of:
          0.048585303 = sum of:
            0.048585303 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048585303 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  4. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.010628035 = product of:
      0.02125607 = sum of:
        0.02125607 = product of:
          0.04251214 = sum of:
            0.04251214 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04251214 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15696937 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  5. Miller, D.H.: User perception and the online catalogue : public library OPAC users "think aloud" (2004) 0.01
    0.009328208 = product of:
      0.018656416 = sum of:
        0.018656416 = product of:
          0.03731283 = sum of:
            0.03731283 = weight(_text_:2003 in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03731283 = score(doc=2659,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19453894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044824958 = queryNorm
                0.19180135 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.339969 = idf(docFreq=1566, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction Significant research in the design and use of online public access catalogues (OPACs) has been conducted by professionals in library and information science (Borgman, 1996; Carlyle, 2001, Carlyle & Timmons, 2002; Hancock, 1987). However, only limited research has addressed actual library user interaction with and perceptions of online catalogue displays and bibliographic elements (Abrera, 1986; Luk, 1996; Markey, 1983). Retrieval systems, specifically online library catalogues, should consider user perceptions and expectations as an important aspect of design and implementation for improved catalogue efficiency (Hert, 1996). Therefore, it is necessary to examine the online catalogue from a user perspective to determine if it is currently succeeding in meeting the bibliographic needs of users in terms of description, display, navigation, and to provide principles for design of future OPACs. A study seeking to understand better how public library users interact with general OPAC displays and the more specific displays of bibliographic information was conducted in 2003. Research questions focused an 1) user perceptions of the OPAC, 2) the elements in a bibliographic display standing out as most important in selection and identification, and 3) user feedback an the process of using the OPAC. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the larger study findings having implications for future research and online catalogue design.