Search (179 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × theme_ss:"OPAC"
  1. Schmidt, E.; Weigang, G.; Schulz, U.: OPAC-Nutzer ernst genommen : eine Thinking-Aloud-Studie am ALS-OPAC der Hamburger Öffentlichen Bücherhallen (1997) 0.01
    0.0065515707 = product of:
      0.049136776 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072956234 = product of:
          0.014591247 = sum of:
            0.014591247 = weight(_text_:online in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014591247 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016985506 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
        0.015054256 = product of:
          0.022581384 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=931,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=931,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 931, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=931)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a thinking aloud study with OPAC users at HÖB which revealed considerable difficulties caused by the inadequate design of the interface and the search options for online catalogues. Reports results of an analysis of comments by users on misunderstandings and abortive search attempts which provides insights into strategies for improved OPAC design
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    Type
    a
  2. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.01
    0.006212679 = product of:
      0.06212679 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0103175705 = product of:
          0.020635141 = sum of:
            0.020635141 = weight(_text_:online in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020635141 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.042007826 = sum of:
          0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0029786006 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019602783 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019426443 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.017922899 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
    Type
    a
  3. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬A comparative transaction log analysis of browsing and search formulation in online catalogues (1993) 0.01
    0.005932065 = product of:
      0.05932065 = sum of:
        0.046759073 = weight(_text_:post in 5258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046759073 = score(doc=5258,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 5258, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5258)
        0.011056842 = product of:
          0.022113685 = sum of:
            0.022113685 = weight(_text_:online in 5258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022113685 = score(doc=5258,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 5258, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5258)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0015047337 = product of:
          0.004514201 = sum of:
            0.004514201 = weight(_text_:a in 5258) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004514201 = score(doc=5258,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 5258, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5258)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    OLIVE, a transaction logging facility enhanced with online questionnaires, was used to collect data from users of public and academic library catalogues. The comparative analysis of subject searching behaviour focused on the role of browsing subject headings and brief references in search formulation. Opportunities for browsing are greatly constrained by indexing practices. It is suggested that a more integrated approach to pre-coordinate and post-coordinate searching would be more effective. The logging software has been developed for a number of commercial online catalogues including Geac, CLSI and LIBERTAS. The use of a diagnostic and monitoring tool in the evaluation of OPACs is advocated
    Type
    a
  4. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.; Robertson, S.; Neilson, C.: Evaluation of online catalogues : eliciting information from the user (1991) 0.01
    0.0057015554 = product of:
      0.057015553 = sum of:
        0.046759073 = weight(_text_:post in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046759073 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.009027874 = product of:
          0.018055748 = sum of:
            0.018055748 = weight(_text_:online in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018055748 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00122861 = product of:
          0.00368583 = sum of:
            0.00368583 = weight(_text_:a in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.00368583 = score(doc=2766,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    An investigation of tools, techniques, and methods for the evaluation of interactive library catalogues is described, with emphasis on diagnostic methods and on use of the catalogue in a wider context of user information seeking behaviour. A front-end system (Olive) was developed to test verious enhancements of traditional transaction logging as a data-gathering technique for evaluation purposes. These include full-screen logging, pre- and post-search, online/offline, and in-search interactive questionnaires, search replys as well as talk-aloud. The extent of subject or hybrid searching activity as opposed to specific item searching is also highlighted
    Type
    a
  5. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the médiathèque of the cité des sciences et de l'industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.01
    0.005420675 = product of:
      0.054206748 = sum of:
        0.046759073 = weight(_text_:post in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046759073 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.4491903 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
        0.0063836705 = product of:
          0.012767341 = sum of:
            0.012767341 = weight(_text_:online in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012767341 = score(doc=6233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0010640075 = product of:
          0.0031920224 = sum of:
            0.0031920224 = weight(_text_:a in 6233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0031920224 = score(doc=6233,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.1544581 = fieldWeight in 6233, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6233)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    An exploratory research study on OPACs was done within the framework of the French PARINFO program by four different teams: ENSSIB-CERSI, City Univ. of London, Médiathèque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie and a firm GSI-ERLI. During the month of June 1992, 650 individual searches on four terminals were collected. The sessions were automatically recorded, accompanied by two online questionnaires, a pre-search and a post-search questionnaire. Some questions were asked orally by an interviewer and the answers noted. The article analyses the researches perceived by user as difficult or impossible. Some examples of the difficulties are given
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.; Weller, M.S.: Failure analysis of subject searches in a test of a new design for subject access to online catalogs (1996) 0.00
    0.004116419 = product of:
      0.041164186 = sum of:
        0.033399336 = weight(_text_:post in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033399336 = score(doc=4382,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10409636 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.3208502 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.808009 = idf(docFreq=360, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
        0.0064484817 = product of:
          0.012896963 = sum of:
            0.012896963 = weight(_text_:online in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012896963 = score(doc=4382,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0013163679 = product of:
          0.0039491034 = sum of:
            0.0039491034 = weight(_text_:a in 4382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039491034 = score(doc=4382,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 4382, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4382)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    This article describes the findings of a research project that tested a new subject-access design in an experimental online catalog that had a wide range of subject-searching capabilities and search trees to govern the system's selection of searching capabilities in response to user queries. Library users at 2 academic libraries searched this experimental catalog for topics of their own choosing, judges the usefulness of retrieved titles, and answered post-search questions about their searching experiences. Mixed results from a quantitative analysis (i.e., precision scores) were supplemented with the more conclusive results from a qualitative analysis (i.e., failure analysis). Overall, analyses demonstrated that the new subject-access design that featured search trees was more effective in selecting a subject-searching approach that would prooduce useful information for the subjects users seek than users would select on their own. The qualitative analysis was especially helpful in providing recommendations for improving specific subject-searching approaches to increase their effenciency, increase user perseverance, and encourage browsing. It also suggested enhancements to the new subject-searching design to enable systems to respond to the wide variety of user queries for subjects
    Type
    a
  7. Park, I.: ¬A comparative study of major OPACs in selected academic libraries for developing countries : user study and subjective user evaluation (1997) 0.00
    0.003989318 = product of:
      0.03989318 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014591247 = product of:
          0.029182494 = sum of:
            0.029182494 = weight(_text_:online in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029182494 = score(doc=1778,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01550054 = product of:
          0.023250809 = sum of:
            0.0036480257 = weight(_text_:a in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0036480257 = score(doc=1778,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 1778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=1778,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1778, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1778)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Provides information on the characteristics of 5 online catalogue systems in 5 academic libraries in the austin, Texas and North Texas, USA, and their use by Korean students at University of North Texas, USA, in order to assist system managers in the selection of online catalogues. Proposes recommendations when designing, adopting, or managing a new online catalogue system. Topics for further studies on the characteristics of online systems and their use are also suggested
    Source
    International information and library review. 29(1997) no.1, S.67-83
    Type
    a
  8. Kilgour, F.G.: Online retrieval of single-screen miniature catalogues by university library users (1995) 0.00
    0.0032569622 = product of:
      0.03256962 = sum of:
        0.014591247 = product of:
          0.029182494 = sum of:
            0.029182494 = weight(_text_:online in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029182494 = score(doc=3826,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.5364998 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.016985506 = weight(_text_:u in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016985506 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.28942272 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
        9.928669E-4 = product of:
          0.0029786006 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=3826,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the findings of an experiment simulating use of a university OPAC by academic library users. Examines how effective are online searches by university library users employing surname plus first title word, or last title word, or first and last title words in producing miniature catalogues of i screen. The searches were known item searches for books
    Source
    Online information 95: Proceedings of the 19th International online information meeting, London, 5-7 December 1995. Ed.: D.I. Raitt u. B. Jeapes
    Type
    a
  9. Summey, T.P.; Walchle, B.A.: ¬An investigation into use and instruction for an online catalog (1992) 0.00
    0.0032151272 = product of:
      0.03215127 = sum of:
        0.0098013915 = product of:
          0.019602783 = sum of:
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072956234 = product of:
          0.014591247 = sum of:
            0.014591247 = weight(_text_:online in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014591247 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015054256 = product of:
          0.022581384 = sum of:
            0.0029786006 = weight(_text_:a in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029786006 = score(doc=5065,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
            0.019602783 = weight(_text_:29 in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019602783 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a study questioning catalogue users at Emporia State Univ. about their experiences and their evaluation of NOTIS in order to access how patrons felt about the catalogue and how well they used it. The study focused on the instruction offered by 59 randomly selected NOTIS libraries. Responses were solicited concerning the university or college, the library, and training methods for OPAC users. With the information gained through both parts, the library instruction program and information regarding NOTIS at White Library could be evaluated and modified
    Source
    Technical services quarterly. 10(1992) no.2, S.29-49
    Type
    a
  10. Thissen, F.: Verloren in digitalen Netzen : Nutzertests zur Optimierung der Bedienerfreundlichkei eines Online-Katalogs (2002) 0.00
    0.0026533466 = product of:
      0.026533466 = sum of:
        0.011056842 = product of:
          0.022113685 = sum of:
            0.022113685 = weight(_text_:online in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022113685 = score(doc=243,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014862318 = weight(_text_:u in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014862318 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.25324488 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
        6.14305E-4 = product of:
          0.001842915 = sum of:
            0.001842915 = weight(_text_:a in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.001842915 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen einer Überarbeitung und Erweiterung des Internet-Auftritts der Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart wurde die Bedienerfreundlichkeit (usability) des Online-Katalogs (OPAC) der Bücherei wissenschaftlich getestet, um daraus Kriterien für eine mögliche Verbesserung herauszuarbeiten. Anfragen von Nutzern der Bibliothek und Beobachtungen der Bibliotheksmitarbeiterinnen hatten in der Vergangenheit deutlich gemacht, dass es offensichtlich nicht allen Nutzern problemlos möglich ist, den Katalog effektiv und angemessen zu nutzen. Da es sich beim webbasierten Online-Katalog um das Kernstück der Website der Bibliothek handelt, hatte seine Optimierung größte Priorität. Das Ziel sollte sein, einen Katalog anzubieten, der von sämtlichen potentiellen Nutzern mit den unterschiedlichsten Vorkenntnissen mit möglichst geringem Aufwand und einem optimalen Suchergebnis bedient werden kann.
    Source
    Bibliotheken und die Vernetzung des Wissens. Hrsg.: Achim Puhl u. Richard Stang
    Type
    a
  11. Slone, D.J.: ¬The influence of mental models and goals on search patterns during Web interaction (2002) 0.00
    0.0024153767 = product of:
      0.024153767 = sum of:
        0.00612587 = product of:
          0.01225174 = sum of:
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=5229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007897745 = product of:
          0.01579549 = sum of:
            0.01579549 = weight(_text_:online in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01579549 = score(doc=5229,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.29038906 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010130152 = product of:
          0.015195228 = sum of:
            0.002943488 = weight(_text_:a in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.002943488 = score(doc=5229,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.14243183 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
            0.01225174 = weight(_text_:29 in 5229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01225174 = score(doc=5229,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5229, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5229)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Thirty-one patrons, who were selected by Slone to provide a range of age and experience, agreed when approached while using the catalog of the Wake County library system to try searching via the Internet. Fifteen searched the Wake County online catalog in this manner and 16 searched the World Wide Web, including that catalog. They were subjected to brief pre-structured taped interviews before and after their searches and observed during the searching process resulting in a log of behaviors, comments, pages accessed, and time spent. Data were analyzed across participants and categories. Web searches were characterized as linking, URL, search engine, within a site domain, and searching a web catalog; and participants by the number of these techniques used. Four used only one, 13 used two, 11 used three, two used four, and one all five. Participant experience was characterized as never used, used search engines, browsing experience, email experience, URL experience, catalog experience, and finally chat room/newsgroup experience. Sixteen percent of the participants had never used the Internet, 71% had used search engines, 65% had browsed, 58% had used email, 39% had used URLs, 39% had used online catalogs, and 32% had used chat rooms. The catalog was normally consulted before the web, where both were used, and experience with an online catalog assists in web use. Scrolling was found to be unpopular and practiced halfheartedly.
    Date
    21. 7.2006 11:26:29
    Type
    a
  12. Diepolder, S.: Was ist eine Köperschaft? : Umfrage zur Opac-Nutzung an der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen (2003) 0.00
    0.0023863541 = product of:
      0.03579531 = sum of:
        0.035093244 = weight(_text_:medien in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035093244 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.084356464 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.4160113 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7066307 = idf(docFreq=1085, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
        7.0206285E-4 = product of:
          0.0021061886 = sum of:
            0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 2103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0021061886 = score(doc=2103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2103)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Trotz Opac-Einführungen durch das Bibliothekspersonal treten beim Benutzer häufig Rechercheprobleme auf. Oftmals werden die Möglichkeiten, die der Opac bietet, von Benutzern nicht richtig erkannt. An der Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen gingen im Rahmen des sechsmonatigen Praxissemesters Studentinnen der Fachhochschule Stuttgart - Hochschule der Medien den Ursachen dieses Problems nach.
    Type
    a
  13. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: Evaluating the impact of an online library catalogue on subject searching behaviour at the catalogue and at the shelves (1990) 0.00
    0.0022128255 = product of:
      0.022128254 = sum of:
        0.010195945 = product of:
          0.02039189 = sum of:
            0.02039189 = weight(_text_:online in 5691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02039189 = score(doc=5691,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.37489069 = fieldWeight in 5691, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010615941 = weight(_text_:u in 5691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010615941 = score(doc=5691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.1808892 = fieldWeight in 5691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5691)
        0.0013163679 = product of:
          0.0039491034 = sum of:
            0.0039491034 = weight(_text_:a in 5691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0039491034 = score(doc=5691,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.19109234 = fieldWeight in 5691, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5691)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    The second half of a 'before and after' study to evaluate the impact of an online catalogue on subject searching behaviour is reported. A holistic approach is adopted encompassing both catalogue use and browsing at the shelves for catalogue users and non-users. Verbal and non-verbal data were elicited from searchers using a combined methodology including talk-aloud technique, observation and a screen logging facility. An extensive qualitative analysis was carried out correlating expressed topics, search formulation strategies and documents retrieved at the shelves. The online catalogue environment does not appear to have increased the extent of subject searching nor the use of the bibliographic tool. The manual PRECIS index supported a contextual approach for broad and more interactive search formulations whereas the OPAC encouraged a matching approach and narrow formulations with fewer but user generated formulations. The success rate of the online catalogue was slightly better than that of the manual tools but fewer items were retrieved at the shelves. Non-users of the bibliographic tools seemed to be just as successful. To improve retrieval effectiveness it is suggested that online catalogues should cater for both matching and contextual approaches to searching. Recent research indicates that a more interactive process could be promoted by providing query expansion through a combination of searching aids for matching, for search formulation assistance and for structured contextual retrieval
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
    Type
    a
  14. Sullenger, P.: ¬A serials transaction log analysis (1997) 0.00
    0.0021084945 = product of:
      0.031627417 = sum of:
        0.01225174 = product of:
          0.02450348 = sum of:
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.019375676 = product of:
          0.029063514 = sum of:
            0.0045600324 = weight(_text_:a in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0045600324 = score(doc=1627,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
            0.02450348 = weight(_text_:29 in 1627) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02450348 = score(doc=1627,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1627, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1627)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    A transaction log analysis of searches for serials looks at how users go about their searching (by title, subject, or keyword) and what problems they encounter, and then examines the results of those searches. Explores ways in which serials records could be improved to enhance retrieval
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:54:49
    Type
    a
  15. Zeitlyn, D.; Bex, J.; David, M.: Making sense of online information (1997) 0.00
    0.0019263942 = product of:
      0.019263942 = sum of:
        0.0054717176 = product of:
          0.010943435 = sum of:
            0.010943435 = weight(_text_:online in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.010943435 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012739129 = weight(_text_:u in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012739129 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.058687534 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.017922899 = queryNorm
            0.21706703 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2744443 = idf(docFreq=4547, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
        0.0010530944 = product of:
          0.003159283 = sum of:
            0.003159283 = weight(_text_:a in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003159283 = score(doc=1098,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(3/30)
    
    Abstract
    Presents some results from research into the uses and usefulness of electronic bibliographic databases in academic contexts, carried out as part of a British Library funded research project. Ethnographic and focus group data was gathered initially in 3 departments (natural science, social science and humanities) at the University of Kent at Canterbury covering all academic staff, researchers and postgraduates. This was then expanded to postgraduates and staff in the same 3 disciplines at other universities. 5 themes from this research are outlined: who uses the system, who does not, and where are these activities and inactivities happening; where does formal training occur; and where does learning occur. The problems of interface between computer systems and users often mirrored that between library enquiry staff and users where users did not know to frame questions and the advice given was not in a form understood by the users
    Source
    Electronic library and visual information research: Proceedings of the 4th ELVIRA Conference (ELVIRA 4), Electronic Library and Visual Information Research, De Montfort University, Milton Keynes, May 1997. Ed. by C. Davies u. A. Ramsden
    Type
    a
  16. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.00
    0.001644844 = product of:
      0.024672657 = sum of:
        0.0103175705 = product of:
          0.020635141 = sum of:
            0.020635141 = weight(_text_:online in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020635141 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014355088 = product of:
          0.02153263 = sum of:
            0.0021061886 = weight(_text_:a in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0021061886 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
            0.019426443 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019426443 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
    Type
    a
  17. Moulaison, H.L.: OPAC queries at a medium-sized academic library : a transaction log analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0015740376 = product of:
      0.023610562 = sum of:
        0.009027874 = product of:
          0.018055748 = sum of:
            0.018055748 = weight(_text_:online in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018055748 = score(doc=3599,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014582689 = product of:
          0.021874033 = sum of:
            0.004875895 = weight(_text_:a in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004875895 = score(doc=3599,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
            0.016998138 = weight(_text_:22 in 3599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016998138 = score(doc=3599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3599)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Patron queries at a four-year comprehensive college's online public access catalog were examined via transaction logs from March 2007. Three representative days were isolated for a more detailed examination of search characteristics. The results show that library users employed an average of one to three terms in a search, did not use Boolean operators, and made use of limits one-tenth of the time. Failed queries remained problematic, as a full one-third of searches resulted in zero hits. Implications and recommendations for improvements in the online public access catalog are discussed.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  18. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.00
    0.0014731656 = product of:
      0.022097483 = sum of:
        0.009027874 = product of:
          0.018055748 = sum of:
            0.018055748 = weight(_text_:online in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018055748 = score(doc=7914,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.33194235 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01306961 = product of:
          0.019604415 = sum of:
            0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026062755 = score(doc=7914,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
            0.016998138 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016998138 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.06276294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    The library of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie attracts 4.000 visitors daily of whom 25% consult the GEAC system OPAC. Describes a 1992 survey consisting of online questions followed by an interview. The questionnaires were adapted from ones used in the UK and utilised OLIVE (Online Interactive Validation and Evaluation). While difficulties arose from users' inconsistency in their replies and failures to answer questions, it has become clear that subject access is unsatisfactory, sometimes because of mistyping by the searcher but also because of the vocabulary problems and lack of guidance in search strategies
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
    Type
    a
  19. Markey, K.: Users and the online catalog : subject access problems (1986) 0.00
    0.0014692845 = product of:
      0.022039266 = sum of:
        0.020635141 = product of:
          0.041270282 = sum of:
            0.041270282 = weight(_text_:online in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041270282 = score(doc=342,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.05439423 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0014041257 = product of:
          0.004212377 = sum of:
            0.004212377 = weight(_text_:a in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004212377 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Source
    The impact of online catalogs. Ed.: J.R. Matthews
    Type
    a
  20. Pedretti, G.: ¬L'¬uso dei cataloghi in biblioteca (1996) 0.00
    0.0014499128 = product of:
      0.02174869 = sum of:
        0.008576217 = product of:
          0.017152434 = sum of:
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013172473 = product of:
          0.019758709 = sum of:
            0.0026062755 = weight(_text_:a in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0026062755 = score(doc=109,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.020665944 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
            0.017152434 = weight(_text_:29 in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017152434 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.063047156 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.017922899 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an empirical study at the Queriniana Civic Library, Brescia, of interaction betwee researchers and printed catalogues during bibliographic data retrieval. The study sought to ascertain frequency of catalogue use; research success rate and time taken; and to identify user profiles. Data were obtained by a mixture of questionnaires, interviews and direct observation. Findings showed that 64% of the catalogue users were female; 70% were aged 19-30; 65% were university students or had good school grades; and hardly any were working class. University students preferred keyword access. 50% or all searches were successful. Most search failures related to subject catalogues, which usually required more time. Provides statistics on time spent in research
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    Type
    a

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 163
  • r 8
  • m 4
  • el 3
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…