Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

0.032862537 = product of:
  0.09858761 = sum of:
    0.09858761 = weight(_text_:usage in 3454) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09858761 = score(doc=3454,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04878962 = queryNorm
        0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 3454, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3454)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Major Web search engines, such as AItaVista, are essential tools in the quest to locate online information. This article reports research that used transaction log analysis to examine the characteristics and changes in AItaVista Web searching that occurred from 1998 to 2002. The research questions we examined are (1) What are the changes in AItaVista Web searching from 1998 to 2002? (2) What are the current characteristics of AItaVista searching, including the duration and frequency of search sessions? (3) What changes in the information needs of AItaVista users occurred between 1998 and 2002? The results of our research show (1) a move toward more interactivity with increases in session and query length, (2) with 70% of session durations at 5 minutes or less, the frequency of interaction is increasing, but it is happening very quickly, and (3) a broadening range of Web searchers' information needs, with the most frequent terms accounting for less than 1% of total term usage. We discuss the implications of these findings for the development of Web search engines.

0.032862537 = product of:
  0.09858761 = sum of:
    0.09858761 = weight(_text_:usage in 3112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09858761 = score(doc=3112,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04878962 = queryNorm
        0.36599535 = fieldWeight in 3112, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3112)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Dyslexic users often do not exhibit spelling and reading skills at a level required to perform effective search. To explore whether autocomplete functions reduce the impact of dyslexia on information searching, 20 participants with dyslexia and 20 controls solved 10 predefined tasks in the search engine Google. Eye-tracking and screen-capture documented the searches. There were no significant differences between the dyslexic students and the controls in time usage, number of queries, query lengths, or the use of the autocomplete function. However, participants with dyslexia made more misspellings and looked less at the screen and the autocomplete suggestions lists while entering the queries. The results indicate that although the autocomplete function supported the participants in the search process, a more extensive use of the autocomplete function would have reduced misspellings. Further, the high tolerance for spelling errors considerably reduced the effect of dyslexia, and may be as important as the autocomplete function.

0.028315838 = product of:
  0.08494751 = sum of:
    0.08494751 = product of:
      0.16989502 = sum of:
        0.16989502 = weight(_text_:mining in 6561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16989502 = score(doc=6561,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2752929 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.61714274 = fieldWeight in 6561, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6561)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This project analyzed 541,920 user queries submitted to and executed in an academic Website during a four-year period (May 1997 to May 2001) using a relational database. The purpose of the study is three-fold: (1) to understand Web users' query behavior; (2) to identify problems encountered by these Web users; (3) to develop appropriate techniques for optimization of query analysis and mining. The linguistic analyses focus an query structures, lexicon, and word associations using statistical measures such as Zipf distribution and mutual information. A data model with finest granularity is used for data storage and iterative analyses. Patterns and trends of querying behavior are identified and compared with previous studies.

0.027385449 = product of:
  0.082156345 = sum of:
    0.082156345 = weight(_text_:usage in 3752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.082156345 = score(doc=3752,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.26936847 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04878962 = queryNorm
        0.30499613 = fieldWeight in 3752, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.52102 = idf(docFreq=480, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3752)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Web search engines act as gatekeepers when people search for information online. Research has shown that search engine users seem to trust the search engines' ranking uncritically and mostly select top-ranked results. This study further examines search engine users' selection behavior. Drawing from the credibility and information research literature, we test whether the presence or absence of certain credibility cues influences the selection probability of search engine results. In an observational study, participants (N?=?247) completed two information research tasks on preset search engine results pages, on which three credibility cues (source reputation, message neutrality, and social recommendations) as well as the search result ranking were systematically varied. The results of our study confirm the significance of the ranking. Of the three credibility cues, only reputation had an additional effect on selection probabilities. Personal characteristics (prior knowledge about the researched issues, search engine usage patterns, etc.) did not influence the preference for search results linked with certain credibility cues. These findings are discussed in light of situational and contextual characteristics (e.g., involvement, low-cost scenarios).

0.014301658 = product of:
  0.042904973 = sum of:
    0.042904973 = product of:
      0.085809946 = sum of:
        0.085809946 = weight(_text_:mining in 3961) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085809946 = score(doc=3961,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2752929 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.31170416 = fieldWeight in 3961, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.642448 = idf(docFreq=425, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3961)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Purpose - Cognitive style has been identified to be significantly influential in deciding users' preferences of search engines. In particular, Witkin's field dependence/independence has been widely studied in the area of web searching. It has been suggested that this cognitive style has conceptual links with the holism/serialism. This study aims to investigate the differences between the field dependence/independence and holism/serialism. Design/methodology/approach - An empirical study was conducted with 120 students from a UK university. Riding's cognitive style analysis (CSA) and Ford's study preference questionnaire (SPQ) were used to identify the students' cognitive styles. A questionnaire was designed to identify users' preferences for the design of search engines. Data mining techniques were applied to analyse the data obtained from the empirical study. Findings - The results highlight three findings. First, a fundamental link is confirmed between the two cognitive styles. Second, the relationship between field dependent users and holists is suggested to be more prominent than that of field independent users and serialists. Third, the interface design preferences of field dependent and field independent users can be split more clearly than those of holists and serialists. Originality/value - The contributions of this study include a deeper understanding of the similarities and differences between field dependence/independence and holists/serialists as well as proposing a novel methodology for data analyses.

0.0066103204 = product of:
  0.01983096 = sum of:
    0.01983096 = product of:
      0.03966192 = sum of:
        0.03966192 = weight(_text_:22 in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03966192 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

2. 6.2005 10:34:22

0.0066103204 = product of:
  0.01983096 = sum of:
    0.01983096 = product of:
      0.03966192 = sum of:
        0.03966192 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03966192 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.

0.0055086007 = product of:
  0.016525801 = sum of:
    0.016525801 = product of:
      0.033051603 = sum of:
        0.033051603 = weight(_text_:22 in 2117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033051603 = score(doc=2117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

24. 1.2004 18:27:22

0.0055086007 = product of:
  0.016525801 = sum of:
    0.016525801 = product of:
      0.033051603 = sum of:
        0.033051603 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033051603 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17085294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04878962 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date

26. 1.2014 18:48:22