Search (251 results, page 1 of 13)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.04
    0.042657852 = product of:
      0.085315704 = sum of:
        0.085315704 = sum of:
          0.010754423 = weight(_text_:a in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010754423 = score(doc=3687,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02496453 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.049596746 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.045758117 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a questionnaire survey to assess the attitudes of scholarly users towards electronic journals and examines the current level of use of these publications by university academics in 2 departments in each of 5 faculties of a UK university
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
    Type
    a
  2. Buch, H.: "Wie zufrieden sind Sie mit dem Schlagwortkatalog?" : Benutzungsuntersuchung am Schlagwortkatalog der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster (1998) 0.02
    0.020341193 = product of:
      0.040682387 = sum of:
        0.040682387 = product of:
          0.061023578 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=545,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
            0.052957762 = weight(_text_:h in 545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052957762 = score(doc=545,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 545, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=545)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.2, S.233-241
    Type
    a
  3. Wallace, P.M.: Periodical title searching in online catalogues (1997) 0.02
    0.01906709 = product of:
      0.03813418 = sum of:
        0.03813418 = product of:
          0.05720127 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=1628,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
            0.049596746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049596746 = score(doc=1628,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1628, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1628)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a dramatic shift from subject to periodical title searching at Colorado University Libraries. States possible reasons for the change, examines problems encountered by users with searching the periodical title index and suggests how this change in online catalogue searching may affect future catalogue design and bibliographic instruction
    Date
    29. 7.1998 10:57:22
    Type
    a
  4. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.02
    0.01861519 = product of:
      0.03723038 = sum of:
        0.03723038 = product of:
          0.05584557 = sum of:
            0.01244842 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01244842 = score(doc=883,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  5. Meadow, C.T.: Speculations on the measurement and use of user characteristics in information retrieval experimentation (1994) 0.02
    0.017972663 = product of:
      0.035945326 = sum of:
        0.035945326 = product of:
          0.053917985 = sum of:
            0.0105208345 = weight(_text_:a in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0105208345 = score(doc=1795,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Presents a recently composite view of several user studies in information retrieval. Contains personal conclusions and speculations based on these studies, rather than formal statistical results, which so often are not comparable from 1 experiment to another. Suggests a taxonomy of user characteristics for such studies, in order to make results comparable. Discusses methods and effects of user training, then manner of expression of a query or information need, conduct of a search, use of the system command language or its equivalent, analysis by the user of retrieved information, and user satisfaction with outcome. Concludes with suggestions for system design and experimental methodology
    Source
    Canadian journal of information and library science. 19(1994) no.4, S.1-22
    Type
    a
  6. Vogt, R.: "Es wurde keine Treffermenge gefunden" (1999) 0.02
    0.01769935 = product of:
      0.0353987 = sum of:
        0.0353987 = product of:
          0.053098045 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=3946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
            0.043687925 = weight(_text_:h in 3946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043687925 = score(doc=3946,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 3946, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3946)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ProLibris. 4(1999) H.2, S.90-94
    Type
    a
  7. Berger, F.C.; Hofstede, A.H.M. ter; Van der Weide, T.P.: Supporting query by navigation (1996) 0.02
    0.017602425 = product of:
      0.03520485 = sum of:
        0.03520485 = product of:
          0.05280727 = sum of:
            0.009410121 = weight(_text_:a in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009410121 = score(doc=6966,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 6966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=6966,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6966, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6966)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the technique used to study hypertext systems from a very general point of view, focus on monitoring searchers' behaviour, predict the estimation of the ultimate goals of the searchers, and estimate the searchers' determination to find these goals. The components are combined via a Markov chain approach so as to study information retrieval in general and hypertext (hypermedia) in particular. Demonstrates how these estimations can be used to assist searchers during their searching process and presents the derivation of a relevance function for documents, based on these estimations
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Type
    a
  8. Witt, M.: Survey on the use of the catalogue at the Mediatheque of the Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie (CSI) (1993) 0.02
    0.016683705 = product of:
      0.03336741 = sum of:
        0.03336741 = product of:
          0.05005111 = sum of:
            0.0066539603 = weight(_text_:a in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0066539603 = score(doc=7914,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
            0.04339715 = weight(_text_:22 in 7914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339715 = score(doc=7914,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7914, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7914)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The library of the Cité des Sciences et de l'industrie attracts 4.000 visitors daily of whom 25% consult the GEAC system OPAC. Describes a 1992 survey consisting of online questions followed by an interview. The questionnaires were adapted from ones used in the UK and utilised OLIVE (Online Interactive Validation and Evaluation). While difficulties arose from users' inconsistency in their replies and failures to answer questions, it has become clear that subject access is unsatisfactory, sometimes because of mistyping by the searcher but also because of the vocabulary problems and lack of guidance in search strategies
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 22(1993) no.4, S.68-71
    Type
    a
  9. Keller, A.; Neubauer, W.: Dienstleistungsangebote von Bibliotheken in elektronischer Form : Eine Benutzungsstudie der ETH-Bibliothek (1999) 0.02
    0.01628453 = product of:
      0.03256906 = sum of:
        0.03256906 = product of:
          0.048853584 = sum of:
            0.011406789 = weight(_text_:a in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011406789 = score(doc=4068,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 4068) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=4068,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 4068, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4068)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 50(1999) H.7, S.407-412
    Type
    a
  10. 8,8 Millionen Deutsche nutzen das Internet (1998) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 3864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=3864,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3864, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3864)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 3864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=3864,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 3864, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3864)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.5, S.289-290
    Type
    a
  11. Gläser, C.; Kranz, B.; Lück, K.: "Das wissen wir doch am besten, was die Benutzer wollen" : oder: Fokusgruppeninterviews mit Bibliotheksbenutzern zum Thema 'Elektronische Informationsvermittlung im BIS Oldenburg'. Ein Erfahrungsbericht (1998) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.11, S.1912-1921
    Type
    a
  12. Obermeier, F.: Schlagwortsuche in einem lokalen OPAC am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Eichstätt : Benutzerforschung anhand von OPAC-Protokolldaten (1999) 0.02
    0.01517087 = product of:
      0.03034174 = sum of:
        0.03034174 = product of:
          0.04551261 = sum of:
            0.008065818 = weight(_text_:a in 6568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008065818 = score(doc=6568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6568)
            0.037446793 = weight(_text_:h in 6568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037446793 = score(doc=6568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 6568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6568)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksforum Bayern. 27(1999) H.3, S.296-319
    Type
    a
  13. Arbeitskreis 'Benutzererwartungen in die Sacherschließung' der Kommission für Sacherschließung der VÖB: Schlagwort "Benutzerforschung" : Beobachtungen bei der sachlichen Suche im OPAC des österreichischen wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekenverbundes (1997) 0.01
    0.014882898 = product of:
      0.029765796 = sum of:
        0.029765796 = product of:
          0.044648692 = sum of:
            0.013443029 = weight(_text_:a in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.013443029 = score(doc=174,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.25478977 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
            0.031205663 = weight(_text_:h in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031205663 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Mitglieder der Arbeitsgruppe: D. Engl, J. Friedl, J. Labner, M. Sandner, W. Schlacher, A. Schmidt, A. Zartl
    Location
    A
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 50(1997) H.3/4, S.28-49
    Type
    a
  14. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: End-user understanding of subject headings in library catalogs (1999) 0.01
    0.01374349 = product of:
      0.02748698 = sum of:
        0.02748698 = product of:
          0.04123047 = sum of:
            0.004032909 = weight(_text_:a in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.004032909 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.07643694 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
            0.03719756 = weight(_text_:22 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03719756 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  15. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.01257316 = product of:
      0.02514632 = sum of:
        0.02514632 = product of:
          0.03771948 = sum of:
            0.0067215143 = weight(_text_:a in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0067215143 = score(doc=297,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
            0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997967 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
    Type
    a
  16. Belkin, N.J.: ¬An overview of results from Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.01
    0.011916932 = product of:
      0.023833863 = sum of:
        0.023833863 = product of:
          0.035750795 = sum of:
            0.0047528287 = weight(_text_:a in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0047528287 = score(doc=2339,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.090081796 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
            0.030997967 = weight(_text_:22 in 2339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030997967 = score(doc=2339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16023713 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2339)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Over the last 4 years, the Information Interaction Laboratory at Rutgers' School of communication, Information and Library Studies has performed a series of investigations concerned with various aspects of people's interactions with advanced information retrieval (IR) systems. We have benn especially concerned with understanding not just what people do, and why, and with what effect, but also with what they would like to do, and how they attempt to accomplish it, and with what difficulties. These investigations have led to some quite interesting conclusions about the nature and structure of people's interactions with information, about support for cooperative human-computer interaction in query reformulation, and about the value of visualization of search results for supporting various forms of interaction with information. In this discussion, I give an overview of the research program and its projects, present representative results from the projects, and discuss some implications of these results for support of subject searching in information retrieval systems
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Type
    a
  17. Yerbury, H.; Parker, J.: Novice searchers' use of familiar structures in searching bibliographic information retrieval systems (1998) 0.01
    0.011271054 = product of:
      0.022542108 = sum of:
        0.022542108 = product of:
          0.03381316 = sum of:
            0.015089762 = weight(_text_:a in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015089762 = score(doc=2874,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.28600082 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
            0.018723397 = weight(_text_:h in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018723397 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of a study of the use of metaphors as problem solving mechanisms by novice searchers of bibliographic databases. Metaphors provide a framework or 'familiar structure' of credible associations within which relationships in other domains may be considered. 28 students taking an undergraduate course in information retrieval at Sydney University of Technology, were recorded as they 'talked through' a search on a bibliographic retrieval system. The transcripts were analyzed using conventional methods and the NUDIST software package for qualitative research. A range of metaphors was apparent from the language use by students in the search process. Those which predominated were: a journey; human interaction; a building or matching process; a problem solving process, and a search for a quantity. Many of the studentes experiencing the interaction as a problem solving process or a search for quantity perceived the outcomes as successful. Concludes that when memory for operating methods and procedures is incomplete an unconscious approach through the use of a conceptual system which is consonant with the task at hand may also lead to success in bibliographic searching
    Type
    a
  18. Wu, M.-H.; Martin, C.D.: ¬An exploratory study of user media preferences in a public setting (1997) 0.01
    0.011122987 = product of:
      0.022245973 = sum of:
        0.022245973 = product of:
          0.03336896 = sum of:
            0.011524997 = weight(_text_:a in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011524997 = score(doc=452,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
            0.021843962 = weight(_text_:h in 452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021843962 = score(doc=452,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 452, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=452)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the assumption that people want to be presented with as many different media as are possible in a given application. Reports on an exploratory study designed to assess the media preferences og the 'person on the street' when presented with the choice of 7 different media combinations to find out some unknown thing in a public space. Findings suggests that people do not always prefer to access as many different media as are available. There was a bias toward having some media combination that includes graphics, but there was also some bias against having information presented using sound in a public space
    Type
    a
  19. Jacquin, A.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der regionalen Verbunddatenbank des Südwestdeutschen Bibliotheksverbundes (SWB) (1995) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 1377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=1377,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1377, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1377)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 1377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=1377,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 1377, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1377)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 15(1995) H.2, S.121-138
    Type
    a
  20. Huang, M.-h.: End-users' searching behaviour : changes in search type over time (1996) 0.01
    0.010856352 = product of:
      0.021712704 = sum of:
        0.021712704 = product of:
          0.032569055 = sum of:
            0.007604526 = weight(_text_:a in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007604526 = score(doc=5128,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.052761257 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
            0.02496453 = weight(_text_:h in 5128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02496453 = score(doc=5128,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.113683715 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045758117 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5128, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5128)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Identifies 6 types of searches on the basis of paudsing behaviour by using cluster analysis. The 6 types of search were highly associated with search fleuncy and the construction of a mental model. Examines learning during multiple searches on the basis of the 6 types. Finds that searchers gain more experience, increase their searching proficiency and become more fluent at searching while online. The changes of search level in multiple searches showed that most searchers moved towards greater fleuncy
    Type
    a

Authors

Languages