Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kim, J.; Thomas, P.; Sankaranarayana, R.; Gedeon, T.; Yoon, H.-J.: Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior and performance in web search on large and small screens (2015) 0.04
    0.038308505 = product of:
      0.11492551 = sum of:
        0.11492551 = weight(_text_:desktop in 1666) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11492551 = score(doc=1666,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30109346 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043577395 = queryNorm
            0.3816938 = fieldWeight in 1666, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.9093957 = idf(docFreq=119, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1666)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years, searching the web on mobile devices has become enormously popular. Because mobile devices have relatively small screens and show fewer search results, search behavior with mobile devices may be different from that with desktops or laptops. Therefore, examining these differences may suggest better, more efficient designs for mobile search engines. In this experiment, we use eye tracking to explore user behavior and performance. We analyze web searches with 2 task types on 2 differently sized screens: one for a desktop and the other for a mobile device. In addition, we examine the relationships between search performance and several search behaviors to allow further investigation of the differences engendered by the screens. We found that users have more difficulty extracting information from search results pages on the smaller screens, although they exhibit less eye movement as a result of an infrequent use of the scroll function. However, in terms of search performance, our findings suggest that there is no significant difference between the 2 screens in time spent on search results pages and the accuracy of finding answers. This suggests several possible ideas for the presentation design of search results pages on small devices.
  2. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.01
    0.0059041358 = product of:
      0.017712407 = sum of:
        0.017712407 = product of:
          0.035424814 = sum of:
            0.035424814 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035424814 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  3. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.00
    0.0049201134 = product of:
      0.01476034 = sum of:
        0.01476034 = product of:
          0.02952068 = sum of:
            0.02952068 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952068 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  4. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.00
    0.0049201134 = product of:
      0.01476034 = sum of:
        0.01476034 = product of:
          0.02952068 = sum of:
            0.02952068 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952068 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  5. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.00
    0.0049201134 = product of:
      0.01476034 = sum of:
        0.01476034 = product of:
          0.02952068 = sum of:
            0.02952068 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952068 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  6. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.00
    0.0049201134 = product of:
      0.01476034 = sum of:
        0.01476034 = product of:
          0.02952068 = sum of:
            0.02952068 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952068 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  7. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.00
    0.0049201134 = product of:
      0.01476034 = sum of:
        0.01476034 = product of:
          0.02952068 = sum of:
            0.02952068 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02952068 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  8. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.00
    0.0039360905 = product of:
      0.0118082715 = sum of:
        0.0118082715 = product of:
          0.023616543 = sum of:
            0.023616543 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023616543 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15260062 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.043577395 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22