Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Mizrachi, D.; Bates, M.J.: Undergraduates' personal academic information management and the consideration of time and task-urgency (2013) 0.02
    0.018829735 = product of:
      0.09414867 = sum of:
        0.09414867 = sum of:
          0.06535138 = weight(_text_:management in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06535138 = score(doc=1003,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.45609936 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
          0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 1003) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02879729 = score(doc=1003,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1003, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1003)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Young undergraduate college students are often described as "digital natives," presumed to prefer living and working in completely digital information environments. In reality, their world is part-paper/part-digital, in constant transition among successive forms of digital storage and communication devices. Studying for a degree is the daily work of these young people, and effective management of paper and digital academic materials and resources contributes crucially to their success in life. Students must also constantly manage their work against deadlines to meet their course and university requirements. This study, following the "Personal Information Management" (PIM) paradigm, examines student academic information management under these various constraints and pressures. A total of 41 18- to 22-year-old students were interviewed and observed regarding the content, structure, and uses of their immediate working environment within their dormitory rooms. Students exhibited remarkable creativity and variety in the mixture of automated and manual resources and devices used to support their academic work. The demands of a yearlong procession of assignments, papers, projects, and examinations increase the importance of time management activities and influence much of their behavior. Results provide insights on student use of various kinds of information technology and their overall planning and management of information associated with their studies.
  2. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.011095377 = product of:
      0.05547688 = sum of:
        0.05547688 = sum of:
          0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02667959 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02879729 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
    Source
    Information processing and management. 51(2015) no.5, S.557-569
  3. Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015) 0.01
    0.0088763 = product of:
      0.044381503 = sum of:
        0.044381503 = sum of:
          0.021343673 = weight(_text_:management in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021343673 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.14896142 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
          0.02303783 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02303783 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.2-26
  4. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.00
    0.0034556747 = product of:
      0.017278373 = sum of:
        0.017278373 = product of:
          0.034556746 = sum of:
            0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034556746 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  5. Borlund, P.; Dreier, S.: ¬An investigation of the search behaviour associated with Ingwersen's three types of information needs (2014) 0.00
    0.003201551 = product of:
      0.016007755 = sum of:
        0.016007755 = product of:
          0.03201551 = sum of:
            0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03201551 = score(doc=2691,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2691, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2691)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 50(2014) no.4, S.493-507
  6. Westman, S.; Laine-Hernandez, M.; Oittinen, P.: Development and evaluation of a multifaceted magazine image categorization model (2011) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 4193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=4193,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4193, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4193)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:09:26
  7. Aloteibi, S.; Sanderson, M.: Analyzing geographic query reformulation : an exploratory study (2014) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 1177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=1177,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1177, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1177)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26. 1.2014 18:48:22
  8. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.00
    0.002879729 = product of:
      0.014398645 = sum of:
        0.014398645 = product of:
          0.02879729 = sum of:
            0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02879729 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  9. Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013) 0.00
    0.002667959 = product of:
      0.013339795 = sum of:
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=1103,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  10. Cleverley, P.H.; Burnett, S.; Muir, L.: Exploratory information searching in the enterprise : a study of user satisfaction and task performance (2017) 0.00
    0.002667959 = product of:
      0.013339795 = sum of:
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=3319,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    No prior research has been identified that investigates the causal factors for workplace exploratory search task performance. The impact of user, task, and environmental factors on user satisfaction and task performance was investigated through a mixed methods study with 26 experienced information professionals using enterprise search in an oil and gas enterprise. Some participants found 75% of high-value items, others found none, with an average of 27%. No association was found between self-reported search expertise and task performance, with a tendency for many participants to overestimate their search expertise. Successful searchers may have more accurate mental models of both search systems and the information space. Organizations may not have effective exploratory search task performance feedback loops, a lack of learning. This may be caused by management bias towards technology, not capability, a lack of systems thinking. Furthermore, organizations may not "know" they "don't know" their true level of search expertise, a lack of knowing. A metamodel is presented identifying the causal factors for workplace exploratory search task performance. Semistructured qualitative interviews with search staff from the defense, pharmaceutical, and aerospace sectors indicates the potential transferability of the finding that organizations may not know their search expertise levels.
  11. Vuong, T.; Saastamoinen, M.; Jacucci, G.; Ruotsalo, T.: Understanding user behavior in naturalistic information search tasks (2019) 0.00
    0.002667959 = product of:
      0.013339795 = sum of:
        0.013339795 = product of:
          0.02667959 = sum of:
            0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 5419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02667959 = score(doc=5419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Understanding users' search behavior has largely relied on the information available from search engine logs, which provide limited information about the contextual factors affecting users' behavior. Consequently, questions such as how users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the users' tasks affect search behavior, as well as what triggers information needs, remain largely unanswered. We report an experiment in which naturalistic information search behavior was captured by analyzing 24/7 continuous recordings of information on participants' computer screens. Written task diaries describing the participants' tasks were collected and used as real-life task contexts for further categorization. All search tasks were extracted and classified under various task categories according to users' intentions, task goals, and substances of the tasks. We investigated the effect of different task categories on three behavioral factors: search efforts, content-triggers, and application context. Our results suggest four findings: (i) Search activity is integrally associated with the users' creative processes. The content users have seen prior to searching more often triggers search, and is used as a query, within creative tasks. (ii) Searching within intellectual and creative tasks is more time-intensive, while search activity occurring as a part of daily routine tasks is associated with more frequent searching within a search task. (iii) Searching is more often induced from utility applications in tasks demanding a degree of intellectual effort. (iv) Users' leisure information-seeking activity is occurring inherently within social media services or comes from social communication platforms. The implications of our findings for information access and management systems are discussed.