Search (103 results, page 2 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Wang, P.; Hawk, W.B.; Tenopir, C.: Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources : an exploratory study using a holistic approach (2000) 0.02 
    0.01721192 = product of:
  0.06884768 = sum of:
    0.06884768 = weight(_text_:c in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06884768 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.02 
    0.015923107 = product of:
  0.06369243 = sum of:
    0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06369243 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Ellis, et alia, now provide part five of their study on mediated searching which is treated separately here because of the presence of additional authors. The data source remains cases collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K. but the focus here is on seeker/intermediary interaction utilizing the Saracevic triadic IR model, and the method is the analysis of discourse. While the pre-search interview stressed problem definition, interaction during the search in terms of relevance and magnitude continued to develop the problem statement. The user and intermediary focused on search tactics, review and relevance, while the intermediary interaction with the system was comprised of terminology and answers. The interaction clearly affected the search process. Users and intermediaries considered the process effective and users felt the intermediary increased their overall satisfaction.
  3. Spink, A.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Ellis, D.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 1: theoretical framework and research design (2002) 0.02 
    0.015923107 = product of:
  0.06369243 = sum of:
    0.06369243 = weight(_text_:et in 5240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06369243 = score(doc=5240,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3110389 = fieldWeight in 5240, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5240)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this issue we begin with the first of four parts of a five part series of papers by Spink, Wilson, Ford, Foster, and Ellis. Spink, et alia, in the first section of this report set forth the design of a project to test whether existing models of the information search process are appropriate for an environment of mediated successive searching which they believe characterizes much information seeking behavior. Their goal is to develop an integrated model of the process. Data were collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K., with individuals with real information needs engaged in interaction with operational information retrieval systems by use of transaction logs, recordings of interactions with intermediaries, pre, and post search interviews, questionnaire responses, relevance judgments of retrieved text, and responses to a test of cognitive styles. Questionnaires were based upon the Kuhlthau model, the Saracevic model, the Ellis model, and incorporated a visual analog scale to avoid a consistency bias.
  4. Kübler, H.-D.: Aufwachsen mit dem Web : Surfen eher selten: zwei Studien zur Internetnutzung von Kindern (2005) 0.02 
    0.015679203 = product of:
  0.031358406 = sum of:
    0.021230811 = weight(_text_:et in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021230811 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.10367964 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
    0.010127594 = product of:
      0.020255188 = sum of:
        0.020255188 = weight(_text_:al in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020255188 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20001286 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.101269424 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Beobachtungen und Befragungen Da kommen die beiden vorliegenden Studien gerade recht, untersuchen sie doch mit qualitativen Methoden, mit Befragungen und teilnehmenden Beobachtungen, wie Kinder das Internet entdecken beziehungsweise nutzen, welche Kompetenzen sie haben und entwickeln, welche Erwartungen, Interessen und Präferenzen sie für das Netz haben, wie und welche Orientierungen und Suchstrategien sie entfalten und schließlich wodurch und wie sie sich von den Web-Sites ansprechen lassen. Das wird jeweils an einzelnen Beispielen und Szenen anschaulich beschrieben, teils wörtlich dokumentiert, sodass man plastische Eindrücke bekommt, wie Kinder an das Web herangehen, wie sie sich zurechtfinden und was sie darüber denken und wissen. Die eine Studie (Christine Feil et al. 2004) wurde zwischen 2001 und 2003 am Deutschen Jugendinstitut (DJI) München mit Unterstützung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung durchgeführt; an ihr sind mehrere ForscherInnen beteiligt gewesen. Entsprechend komplexer und differenzierter sind ihre Erhebungsmethoden, entsprechend aufwendiger ist ihr Forschungsdesign, und entsprechend umfassender und dichter sind ihre Ergebnisse. Teilgenommen an der Studie haben elf Mädchen und sieben Jungen zwischen fünf und elf Jahren; sie wurden in zwei bis drei mindestens einstündigen Beobachtungsphasen in ihrem Umgang mit PC und Internet per Video beobachtet, zweimal befragt wurden die Eltern und die Erzieherinnen der Horte, in die die Kinder gehen. Die andere (Susanne Richter 2004) ist eine literaturdidaktische Dissertation an der Universität Lüneburg, deren empirischer Teil schon 1999, also drei Jahre früher als die DJI-Studie, durchgeführt wurde. Beteiligt waren 25 Schüler, darunter nur sechs Mädchen, zwischen zehn und 13 Jahren, die von der Autorin nach ihrer PC-Nutzung befragt und während einer halbstündigen »Surfphase« über vier ausgewählte Web-Sites beobachtet wurden. Mithin sind die Populationen allenfalls für die neun 10- bis 11-Jährigen der DJI-Studie vergleichbar, die andere Hälfte ist jünger.
  5. Jörgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: Information access or information anxiety? : an explanatory evaluation of book index features (1996) 0.01 
    0.014343265 = product of:
  0.05737306 = sum of:
    0.05737306 = weight(_text_:c in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05737306 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.381109 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Fourie, I.: ¬A theoretical model for studying Web information seeking / searching behaviour (2003) 0.01 
    0.014343265 = product of:
  0.05737306 = sum of:
    0.05737306 = weight(_text_:c in 3539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05737306 = score(doc=3539,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.381109 = fieldWeight in 3539, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3539)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Tendencias de investigación en organización del conocimient: IV Cologuio International de Ciencas de la Documentación , VI Congreso del Capitulo Espanol de ISKO = Trends in knowledge organization research. Eds.: J.A. Frias u. C. Travieso
  7. Greisdorf, H.; O'Connor, B.: Nodes of topicality modeling user notions of on topic documents (2003) 0.01 
    0.013269257 = product of:
  0.053077027 = sum of:
    0.053077027 = weight(_text_:et in 5175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053077027 = score(doc=5175,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20477319 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2591991 = fieldWeight in 5175, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5175)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Griesdorf and O'Connor attempt to determine the aspects of a retrieved item that provide a questioner with evidence that the item is in fact on the topic searched independent of its relevance. To this end they collect data from 32 participants, 11 from the business community as well as 21 doctoral students at the University of North Texas each of whom were asked to state if they considered material that approaches a topic in each of 14 specific manners as " on topic" or "off topic." Chi-square indicates that the observed values are significantly different from expected values and the chi-square residuals for on topic judgements exceed plus or minus two in eight cases and plus two in five cases. The positive values which indicate a percentage of response greater than that from chance suggest that documents considered topical are only related to the problem at hand, contain terms that were in the query, and describe, explain or expand the topic of the query. The chi-square residuals for off topic judgements exceed plus or minus two in ten cases and plus two in four cases. The positive values suggest that documents considered not topical exhibit a contrasting, contrary, or confounding point of view, or merely spark curiosity. Such material might well be relevant, but is not judged topical. This suggests that topical appropriateness may best be achieved using the Bruza, et alia, left compositional monotonicity approach.
  8. Huang, C.-Y.; Shen, Y.-C.; Chiang, I.-P.; Lin, C.-S.: Characterizing Web users' online information behavior (2007) 0.01 
    0.012421633 = product of:
  0.049686532 = sum of:
    0.049686532 = weight(_text_:c in 616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049686532 = score(doc=616,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3300501 = fieldWeight in 616, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=616)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Bergen, C. van; Mastenbroek, O.: Wat wil de gebruiker? : onderwerpsontsluiting bij de Universiteitsbibliotheek Utrecht (1995) 0.01 
    0.011474612 = product of:
  0.04589845 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=1605,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1605, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1605)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Tenopir, C.; Nahl-Jakobovits, D.; Howard, D.L.: Strategies and assessments online : novices' experience (1991) 0.01 
    0.011474612 = product of:
  0.04589845 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  11. Mann, L.; Ball, C.: ¬The relationship between search strategy and risky choice (1994) 0.01 
    0.011474612 = product of:
  0.04589845 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Tenopir, C.: Common end user errors (1997) 0.01 
    0.011474612 = product of:
  0.04589845 = sum of:
    0.04589845 = weight(_text_:c in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04589845 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.3048872 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.01 
    0.010347793 = product of:
  0.04139117 = sum of:
    0.04139117 = product of:
      0.08278234 = sum of:
        0.08278234 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08278234 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  14. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.01 
    0.010347793 = product of:
  0.04139117 = sum of:
    0.04139117 = product of:
      0.08278234 = sum of:
        0.08278234 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08278234 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15283036 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.043643 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  15. Eager, C.; Oppenheim, C.: ¬An observational method for undertaking user needs studies (1996) 0.01 
    0.010142221 = product of:
  0.040568884 = sum of:
    0.040568884 = weight(_text_:c in 3671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040568884 = score(doc=3671,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 3671, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3671)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Banwell, L.; Ray, K.; Coulson, G.; Urquhart, C.; Lonsdale, R.; Armstrong, C.; Thomas, R.; Spink, S.; Yeoman, A.; Fenton, R.; Rowley, J.: ¬The JISC User Behaviour Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (2004) 0.01 
    0.010142221 = product of:
  0.040568884 = sum of:
    0.040568884 = weight(_text_:c in 4434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040568884 = score(doc=4434,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 4434, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4434)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Sage, C.; Klaas, J.; Spalding, H.H.; Robinson, T.: ¬A queueing study of public catalog use (1981) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=2167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
  19. Croucher, C.: Problems of subject access : user studies and interface design (1986) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 2395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=2395,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2395, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2395)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  20. Liddy, E.D.; Jorgensen, C.: Modelling information seeking behaviours in index use (1993) 0.01 
    0.010040285 = product of:
  0.04016114 = sum of:
    0.04016114 = weight(_text_:c in 7920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04016114 = score(doc=7920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1505424 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043643 = queryNorm
        0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 7920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7920)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 91
  • d 6
  • f 3
  • nl 2
  • More… Less…

Themes