Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × type_ss:"r"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Crawford, J.C.; Thorn, L.C.; Powles, J.A.: ¬A survey of subject access to academic library catalogues in Great Britain : a report to the British Library Research and Development Department (1992) 0.06
    0.06345081 = product of:
      0.14276433 = sum of:
        0.030001212 = product of:
          0.060002424 = sum of:
            0.060002424 = weight(_text_:headings in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060002424 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15996648 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03298316 = queryNorm
                0.37509373 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.849944 = idf(docFreq=940, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.03943543 = weight(_text_:library in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03943543 = score(doc=367,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.45471698 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.015279518 = weight(_text_:of in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015279518 = score(doc=367,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.29624295 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
        0.05804818 = weight(_text_:congress in 367) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05804818 = score(doc=367,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15733992 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.36893487 = fieldWeight in 367, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.7703104 = idf(docFreq=1018, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=367)
      0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
    
    Abstract
    The study of subject access to UK academic library catalogues was based on a questionnaires end out during Summer 1991. 86 out of a possible 110 questionnaires were returned. All universities and polytechniques now have OPACs which are progressing well towards comprehensive bibliographical coverage of their libraries' stocks. The MARC format is now widely used. Subject access strategies are usually based on either Library of Congress Subject Headings or inhouse indexing systems but almost half the OPACs studies have no separate subject searching option based on subject indexing is expensive and future subject indexing strategies are best based on pre-existing controlled vocabularies. Strategies authority control is essential. A limited range of software strategies is recommended including the need to limit search results
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  2. Bryant, P.: Use and understanding of the library catalogues in Cambridge University Library : a survey (1993) 0.02
    0.015452093 = product of:
      0.06953442 = sum of:
        0.049370687 = weight(_text_:library in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049370687 = score(doc=7311,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.56927717 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
        0.020163735 = weight(_text_:of in 7311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020163735 = score(doc=7311,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 7311, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7311)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the result of survey of users of the library catalogues in Cambridge University Library carried out in 1992 which aimed to discover the uses of the catalogues and the user's understanding of them. Describes the projects objectives, gives a history of the Cambridge University Library, describes the catalogues and details the conduct of the survey and results
    Imprint
    London : British Library Research and Development Department
  3. Woods, F.; Walsh, C.; Ford, N.: Effects of postings information on user searching behaviour (1994) 0.01
    0.0076432195 = product of:
      0.034394488 = sum of:
        0.015116624 = weight(_text_:library in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015116624 = score(doc=940,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.17430481 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
        0.019277865 = weight(_text_:of in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019277865 = score(doc=940,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.37376386 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of an investigation, undertaken at Sheffield University, Departmant of Information Studies, UK into the effects of postings information (the display on the screen of the number of references in the retrieved sets) on searching behaviour. Linked online searches were conducted, on the LISA database on CD-ROM, with and without postings information. Performance in terms of the number of relevant references, precision and recall was not significantly different whether postings information was available or not; but searches with postings information took more time and more sets were viewed than in searches without postings. Searchers thought that the lack of postings information had affected 90% of their searches. Proposes that training should place greater emphasis on the value of postings information at different stages of the search and should optimize the searching behaviour of those with different searching styles
    Imprint
    London : British Library
  4. Dyer, H.; Bouchet, M.-L.: ¬A comparison between the perceived value of information retrieved via end-user searching of CD-ROMs and mediated online searching (1995) 0.01
    0.007586628 = product of:
      0.034139827 = sum of:
        0.01763606 = weight(_text_:library in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01763606 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08672522 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.20335563 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6293786 = idf(docFreq=8668, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
        0.016503768 = weight(_text_:of in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016503768 = score(doc=2417,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05157766 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03298316 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    W.S. Cooper's utility theory was used to evaluate end user and mediated searching of online and CD-ROM databases. The searches were conducted by 510 end users, using MEDLINE. The relevance of the references and the usefulness of the documents retrieved were examnied. The study also assessed the perceived value to end users of the information retrieved. Mediated online searching cost 3 times as much as end user CD-ROM searching, but was only about twice as effective in terms of user satisfaction; user convenience should be a high priority for the information provider and mediated CD-ROM searching may be the best compromise currently available as regards cost effectiveness and successful information retrieval for end users
    Imprint
    London : British Library Research and Development Department