Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Kluck, M.: ¬Die Informationsanalyse im Online-Zeitalter : Befunde der Benutzerforschung zum Informationsverhalten im Internet (2004) 0.03 
    0.03243518 = product of:
  0.10811725 = sum of:
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
    0.019551745 = weight(_text_:und in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019551745 = score(doc=2928,freq=40.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.438048 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          6.3245554 = tf(freq=40.0), with freq of:
            40.0 = termFreq=40.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
    0.023900734 = weight(_text_:methoden in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023900734 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.22902192 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
    0.022643808 = weight(_text_:der in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022643808 = score(doc=2928,freq=52.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.50337255 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          7.2111025 = tf(freq=52.0), with freq of:
            52.0 = termFreq=52.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 2928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=2928,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 2928, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2928)
  0.3 = coord(6/20)
    Abstract
    Die Notwendigkeit des professionellen Einsatzes von empirischen Methoden als Grundvoraussetzung für den Entwurf und die Gestaltung von Informationsdiensten, Informationsprodukten und Informationssystemen ist seit den frühen sechzigerfahren in der Informationsarbeit erkannt worden. Anfänglich wurde - ausgedrückt durch die Bezeichnung "Benutzerforschung" oder "fachliche Rezipientenforschung" -versucht, den Informationsbedarfvon unterschiedlichen Benutzergruppen (im Rahmen einer Typologie der Benutzer von Informationssystemen) zu messen und aufgrund dieser Daten zu Einschätzungen von Art, Menge, Umfang und Tiefe von Informationsbedürfnissen zu gelangen. "Benutzerforschung sollte den Lebensweg von Informationsprodukten beziehungsweise Informationsdiensten begleiten. Sie kann erste Anregungen geben, sie liefert Entscheidungshilfen im Planungsstadium und kontrolliert dann, ob, wo und wie sich der geplante Erfolg tatsächlich eingestellt hat." In den siebziger und achtziger Jahren traten dann Fragestellungen in den Vordergrund, die den allgemeinen Nutzen der Information und besonders der Strukturen und Prozesse der Informationsvermittlung empirisch zu beschreiben versuchten. Darüber hinaus wurden mit dem in den siebziger Jahren dann vollzogenen Einsatz der Informationsund Kommunikationstechnologien in den Bibliotheken und Informationsstellen Fragestellungen wichtig, die unter dem Begriff "Kommunikationsanalysen" etwa die Ansätze der Informationsbedarfsmessung mit der empirischen Analyse des Einsatzes von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien verbanden. Ein weiteres Einsatzfeld empirischer Untersuchungen ergab sich aus dem langsamen Entstehen eines Marktes für elektronische Informationsprodukte, wodurch sowohl empirische Marktforschungsstrategien als auch empirische Marketingansätze in die Informationsarbeit hineingetragen wurden. Schließlich traten Untersuchungen der Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Informationssystemen und ihrer Bedienbarkeit sowie dann die allgemeinen Kriterien der Softwareergonomie hinzu. Ferner werden seit den 90er Jahren durch die Nutzung des Internets als Angebotsmedium Aspekte der Kundenorientierung und Fragen der empirischen Nutzungsforschung und der Bedienungsfreundlichkeit (Usability) zunehmend wichtiger. Dementsprechend haben sich auch die Begrifflichkeiten für die Benutzerforschung in Bibliotheken gewandelt: Von Benutzung, Benutzerbedürfnisse, Benutzerforschung, Benutzerfreundlichkeit über Benutzerorientierung, Benutzerzufriedenheit, Benchmarking, Qualitätsmanagement, Bibliotheksmarketing hin zu Kundenorientierung, Kundenzufriedenheit, Service. Hinsichtlich der Internet-Angebote kamen dann Aspekte des Benutzerverhaltens und der Bedienungsfreundlichkeit der Software bzw der Benutzerschnittstellen hinzu. Allen Konzepten ist gemeinsam, dass sie im weitesten Sinne den Prozess der gesellschaftlichen Informationsvermittlung auf einer übergreifenden Ebene verstehbar machen: Aus der Sicht des Nutzers von Information, aus der Sicht manifester und latenter Informationsbedürfnisse, aus der Sicht technisch unterstützter fachlicher Informationsund Kommunikationsprozesse der Information und Dokumentation oder aus der Sicht technischer und ästhetischer Gestaltung. Diese hier grob unterschiedenen Ansätze werden nun unter dem Begriff Informationsanalyse zusammengefasst.
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation. 5., völlig neu gefaßte Ausgabe. 2 Bde. Hrsg. von R. Kuhlen, Th. Seeger u. D. Strauch. Begründet von Klaus Laisiepen, Ernst Lutterbeck, Karl-Heinrich Meyer-Uhlenried. Bd.1: Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis
  2. Poll, R.: Informationsverhalten und Informationsbedarf der Wissenschaft : Teil 1 der Nutzungsanalyse des Systems der überregionalen Literatur- und Informationsversorgung (2004) 0.03 
    0.027177338 = product of:
  0.10870935 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
    0.025374934 = weight(_text_:und in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025374934 = score(doc=2334,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.56851393 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
    0.023314286 = weight(_text_:der in 2334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023314286 = score(doc=2334,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.5182773 = fieldWeight in 2334, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2334)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft fördert in 23 Universitätsbibliotheken (Sondersammelgebieten), 47 Spezialbibliotheken und 3 zentralen Fachbibliotheken ein System der überregionalen Literatur- und Informationsversorgung. Dieses System kooperativer umfassender Sammlung weltweit vorhandener wissenschaftlicher Literatur sollte erstmals aus der Nutzerperspektive evaluiert werden. Es sollten Form und Umfang der tatsächlichen wie der potentiellen Nutzung sowie jetzige und zukünftige Bedarfe ermittelt werden, und zwar beispielhaft in den Fächern Anglistik, Betriebswirtschaft, Biologie, Geschichte und Maschinenbau. Das Projekt wurde 2002/2003 von der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster zusammen mit infas-Institut für angewandte Sozialwissenschaft GmbH durchgeführt. Diese Veröffentlichung zeigt den ersten Teil der Ergebnisse, die das Informationsverhalten von Wissenschaftlern und Wissenschaftlerinnen in den fünf Fächern betreffen.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 51(2004) H.2, S.59-75
  3. Strebe, R.: Empirische Untersuchtung von emotionalen Reaktionen im Prozess der Informationsrecherche im Web (2009) 0.02 
    0.02317481 = product of:
  0.09269924 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
    0.015301661 = weight(_text_:und in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015301661 = score(doc=2769,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=2769,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
    0.017377444 = weight(_text_:der in 2769) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017377444 = score(doc=2769,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 2769, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2769)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag wird eine Studie vorgestellt, die eine beobachtende Perspektive auf affektive Phänomene entlang des Websuchprozesses eröffnet. Untersuchungsgegenstände sind Art, Häufigkeit und Intensität von Gefühlsausschlägen, die Auslöser von emotionalen Reaktionen sowie der Zusammenhang zwischen Gefühlsausschlägen und bestimmten Aktionsmerkmalen. Die Websuche zeigt sich als gefühlsintensive Tätigkeit. Besonders häufige Auslöser von Gefühlsausschlägen stehen in enger Beziehung zu erwarteter Relevanz und Relevanzbewertung. Bei Auslösern von besonders intensiven emotionalen Reaktionen ist der optische Eindruck einer Webseite ein wichtiger Faktor. Weiterer Untersuchungsbedarf zeigt sich vor allem in der Frage der Rolle affektiver Vorgänge innerhalb des Relevanzkonzeptes.
    Date
    23. 3.2009 14:49:32
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.2, S.75-81
  4. Branch, J.L.: Junior high students and think alouds generating information-seeking process data using concurrent verbal protocols (2001) 0.02 
    0.018006042 = product of:
  0.12004027 = sum of:
    0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04001342 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
    0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04001342 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
    0.04001342 = weight(_text_:23 in 6784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04001342 = score(doc=6784,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.55438095 = fieldWeight in 6784, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6784)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Source
    Library and information science research. 23(2001) no.2, S.107-122
  5. Choo, C.W.; Detlor, B.; Turnbull, D.: Information seeking on the Web : an integrated model of browsing and searching (2000) 0.02 
    0.016261624 = product of:
  0.08130812 = sum of:
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=4438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=4438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
    0.0077714287 = weight(_text_:der in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0077714287 = score(doc=4438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
    0.02451223 = weight(_text_:software in 4438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02451223 = score(doc=4438,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 4438, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4438)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    This paper presents findings from a study of how knowledge workers use the Web to seek external information as part of their daily work. 34 users from 7 companies took part in the study. Participants were mainly IT-specialists, managers, and research/marketing/consulting staff working in organizations that included a large utility company; a major bank, and a consulting firm. Participants answered a detailed questionnaire and were interviewed individually in order to understand their information needs and information seeking preferences. A custom-developed WebTracker software application was installed on each of their work place PCs, and participants' Web-use activities were then recorded continuously during two-week periods
    Footnote
    Die Artikel der Zeitschrift FirstMonday (http://www.firstmonday.dk) sind nur nach vorheriger Anmeldung einsehbar
  6. Yitzhaki, M.; Hammershlag, G.: Accessibility and use of information sources among computer scientists and software engineers in Israel : academy versus industry (2004) 0.02 
    0.01623327 = product of:
  0.08116634 = sum of:
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=2388,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=2388,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
    0.0068830615 = product of:
      0.013766123 = sum of:
        0.013766123 = weight(_text_:29 in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013766123 = score(doc=2388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.070840135 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 2388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=2388,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 2388, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2388)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Hypothesizing that workplace significantly affects information-seeking patterns, this study compared accessibility and use of information sources among 233 Israeli computer scientists and software engineers, employed in industry and academy, using a mail questionnaire, which yielded a usable reply rate of 33%. The two groups were found to differ significantly in age, education, seniority, and type of research they performed (basic vs. applied). Printed textbooks, professional journals, and oral discussions with colleagues or experts in the organization were common to both groups, topping almost all lists of accessibility and use. For most information sources, however, the two groups differed significantly and consistently. Printed professional journals as weIl as printed and electronic conference or meeting papers were consistently more accessible and more often used by the academy group, while the industry group reported greater access to and more frequent use of electronic textbooks and trade or promotional literature. In regard to handbooks and standards, in-house technical reports (printed), government technical reports (Internet), librarians and technical specialists (Internet), and oral discussions with supervisors, no significant differences in accessibility were found, but their use by the industry group was much higher. In both groups, accessibility was only partly related to use, and more so among the academy than the industry group.
    Date
    3. 7.2004 15:28:29
  7. Agosto, D.E.: Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making (2002) 0.01 
    0.013697674 = product of:
  0.06848837 = sum of:
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
    0.005456915 = product of:
      0.016370745 = sum of:
        0.016370745 = weight(_text_:22 in 177) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016370745 = score(doc=177,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 177, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=177)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    This study investigated Simon's behavioral decisionmaking theories of bounded rationality and satisficing in relation to young people's decision making in the World Wide Web, and considered the role of personal preferences in Web-based decisions. It employed a qualitative research methodology involving group interviews with 22 adolescent females. Data analysis took the form of iterative pattern coding using QSR NUD*IST Vivo qualitative data analysis software. Data analysis revealed that the study participants did operate within the limits of bounded rationality. These limits took the form of time constraints, information overload, and physical constraints. Data analysis also uncovered two major satisficing behaviors-reduction and termination. Personal preference was found to play a major role in Web site evaluation in the areas of graphic/multimedia and subject content preferences. This study has related implications for Web site designers and for adult intermediaries who work with young people and the Web
  8. Hsieh-Yee, I.: Research on Web-search behavior (2001) 0.01 
    0.012732193 = product of:
  0.08488128 = sum of:
    0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02829376 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02829376 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
    0.02829376 = weight(_text_:23 in 2277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02829376 = score(doc=2277,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.39200652 = fieldWeight in 2277, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2277)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    30.12.2008 12:51:23
    Source
    Library and information science research. 23(2001) no.2, S.167-185
  9. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.01 
    0.011414727 = product of:
  0.057073634 = sum of:
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
    0.0045474293 = product of:
      0.013642288 = sum of:
        0.013642288 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013642288 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  10. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks (2002) 0.01 
    0.011380549 = product of:
  0.056902744 = sum of:
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
    0.005456915 = product of:
      0.016370745 = sum of:
        0.016370745 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016370745 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    Bilal, in this third part of her Yahooligans! study looks at children's performance with self-generated search tasks, as compared to previously assigned search tasks looking for differences in success, cognitive behavior, physical behavior, and task preference. Lotus ScreenCam was used to record interactions and post search interviews to record impressions. The subjects, the same 22 seventh grade children in the previous studies, generated topics of interest that were mediated with the researcher into more specific topics where necessary. Fifteen usable sessions form the basis of the study. Eleven children were successful in finding information, a rate of 73% compared to 69% in assigned research questions, and 50% in assigned fact-finding questions. Eighty-seven percent began using one or two keyword searches. Spelling was a problem. Successful children made fewer keyword searches and the number of search moves averaged 5.5 as compared to 2.4 on the research oriented task and 3.49 on the factual. Backtracking and looping were common. The self-generated task was preferred by 47% of the subjects.
    Date
    21. 7.2006 11:31:23
  11. Nicholas, D.; Nicholas, P.; Jamali, H.R.; Watkinson, A.: ¬The information seeking behaviour of the users of digital scholarly journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.011142492 = product of:
  0.07428328 = sum of:
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=990,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=990,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
    0.024761094 = weight(_text_:software in 990) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024761094 = score(doc=990,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.30993375 = fieldWeight in 990, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=990)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    The article employs deep log analysis (DLA) techniques, a more sophisticated form of transaction log analysis, to demonstrate what usage data can disclose about information seeking behaviour of virtual scholars - academics, and researchers. DLA works with the raw server log data, not the processed, pre-defined and selective data provided by journal publishers. It can generate types of analysis that are not generally available via proprietary web logging software because the software filters out relevant data and makes unhelpful assumptions about the meaning of the data. DLA also enables usage data to be associated with search/navigational and/or user demographic data, hence the name 'deep'. In this connection the usage of two digital journal libraries, those of EmeraldInsight, and Blackwell Synergy are investigated. The information seeking behaviour of nearly three million users is analyzed in respect to the extent to which they penetrate the site, the number of visits made, as well as the type of items and content they view. The users are broken down by occupation, place of work, type of subscriber ("Big Deal", non-subscriber, etc.), geographical location, type of university (old and new), referrer link used, and number of items viewed in a session.
  12. Kübler, H.-D.: Aufwachsen mit dem Web : Surfen eher selten: zwei Studien zur Internetnutzung von Kindern (2005) 0.01 
    0.010093879 = product of:
  0.050469395 = sum of:
    0.01942916 = weight(_text_:und in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01942916 = score(doc=3341,freq=158.0), product of:
        0.044633795 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.43530157 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
          12.569805 = tf(freq=158.0), with freq of:
            158.0 = termFreq=158.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
    0.0061427755 = product of:
      0.012285551 = sum of:
        0.012285551 = weight(_text_:allgemein in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012285551 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10581345 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.11610576 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.254347 = idf(docFreq=627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011950367 = weight(_text_:methoden in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.011950367 = score(doc=3341,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10436003 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.11451096 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.1821747 = idf(docFreq=674, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
    0.012947093 = weight(_text_:der in 3341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012947093 = score(doc=3341,freq=68.0), product of:
        0.044984195 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.28781426 = fieldWeight in 3341, product of:
          8.246211 = tf(freq=68.0), with freq of:
            68.0 = termFreq=68.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3341)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Content
    "Als Generation @ werden Kinder und Jugendliche in der Öffentlichkeit bereits gefeiert, insbesondere Marketing und Werbung schwärmen vom geschickten, unermüdlichen Surfen im WWW, von kinderleichter Handhabung des Equipments, spielerischem Edutainment und spannenden Verlockungen des digitalen Lernens, und zwar schon für die Kleinsten ab dem Kindergartenalter. Mehrheit noch offline Imposant sind auch die quantitativen Daten zur Haushaltsausstattung und PC- beziehungsweise Internetnutzung, vor allem ihre Wachstumsraten, die die Studie von Christine Feil und Co-Autoren referiert und miteinander abgleicht. Susanne Richter (S. 18) hingegen weiß nichts von ihrer Existenz, zumal Angaben aus kommerziellen Kontexten meist zu Obertreibungen neigen. Seriöser sind die Angaben des so genannten Medienpädagogischen Forschungsverbundes Südwest, der seit 1999 die Studie »Kinder und Medien« (»KIM-Studie«) durchführt, 2003 zum vierten Mal. Danach hatten 57 Prozent der bundesdeutschen Haushalte mit 6- bis 13-jährigen Kinder Internet zu Hause (Feil S. 15),42 Prozent der 6-bis 13-Jährigen besuchen hin und wieder das Internet, nur etwa gut zwölf Prozent sind täglich oder mehrmals in der Woche nach Schätzungen durchschnittlich zwischen einer halben und einer Stunde im Netz, werden aber von kommerzieller Seite bereits als »Heavy User« apostrophiert (Feil S. 18). Etwa bei zehn, elf Jahren lag 2003/2004 das Einstiegsalter für das Internet, bei Mädchen und bei Kindern aus niedrigeren Einkommens- und Sozialschichten etwas später. Offenbar haben die inzwischen - auch schon im Primarbereich - gut ausgestatten Schulen noch »kaum kompensatorische Wirkung im Sinne gleicher Zugangschancen für alle Kinder« entfaltet, »sondern allenfalls den Anteil der Kinder mit Sowohl-als-auch-Zugang« erhöht (Feil S. 21). So zeichnen sich tendenziell zwar jeweils steigende Beteiligungen ab, aber »die Mehrheit der Kinder« ist noch »offline«. Und der Zugang der Kinder zum Netz allein »gibt weder Aufschluss über ihre Nutzungskompetenzen noch über die Bedeutung der Kommunikationsund Informationsfunktion des Internets für Kinder« (Feil S. 30), so die sicherlich stimmige Ausgangsthese.
    Beobachtungen und Befragungen Da kommen die beiden vorliegenden Studien gerade recht, untersuchen sie doch mit qualitativen Methoden, mit Befragungen und teilnehmenden Beobachtungen, wie Kinder das Internet entdecken beziehungsweise nutzen, welche Kompetenzen sie haben und entwickeln, welche Erwartungen, Interessen und Präferenzen sie für das Netz haben, wie und welche Orientierungen und Suchstrategien sie entfalten und schließlich wodurch und wie sie sich von den Web-Sites ansprechen lassen. Das wird jeweils an einzelnen Beispielen und Szenen anschaulich beschrieben, teils wörtlich dokumentiert, sodass man plastische Eindrücke bekommt, wie Kinder an das Web herangehen, wie sie sich zurechtfinden und was sie darüber denken und wissen. Die eine Studie (Christine Feil et al. 2004) wurde zwischen 2001 und 2003 am Deutschen Jugendinstitut (DJI) München mit Unterstützung des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung durchgeführt; an ihr sind mehrere ForscherInnen beteiligt gewesen. Entsprechend komplexer und differenzierter sind ihre Erhebungsmethoden, entsprechend aufwendiger ist ihr Forschungsdesign, und entsprechend umfassender und dichter sind ihre Ergebnisse. Teilgenommen an der Studie haben elf Mädchen und sieben Jungen zwischen fünf und elf Jahren; sie wurden in zwei bis drei mindestens einstündigen Beobachtungsphasen in ihrem Umgang mit PC und Internet per Video beobachtet, zweimal befragt wurden die Eltern und die Erzieherinnen der Horte, in die die Kinder gehen. Die andere (Susanne Richter 2004) ist eine literaturdidaktische Dissertation an der Universität Lüneburg, deren empirischer Teil schon 1999, also drei Jahre früher als die DJI-Studie, durchgeführt wurde. Beteiligt waren 25 Schüler, darunter nur sechs Mädchen, zwischen zehn und 13 Jahren, die von der Autorin nach ihrer PC-Nutzung befragt und während einer halbstündigen »Surfphase« über vier ausgewählte Web-Sites beobachtet wurden. Mithin sind die Populationen allenfalls für die neun 10- bis 11-Jährigen der DJI-Studie vergleichbar, die andere Hälfte ist jünger.
    Tipps von Freunden Beide Studien beschränken sich nicht nur auf die Darstellung der empirischen Befunde: Außer der Aufbereitung der quantitativen Nutzungsdaten findet sich in der DJI-Studie noch ein informativer Abriss über »neuere Entwicklungen im deutschen Kinderweh«. Darin werden die neuen Kinder- und Jugendschutzregelungen abgehandelt sowie jüngste formale und inhaltliche Entwicklungen der Internetseiten für Kinder skizziert. Damit setzt das DJI seine Bestandsaufnahmen und Sichtungen von Kindersoftware und -selten, die es seit 1999 vornimmt, fort.* In einer Datenbank (unter www. kinderseiten.de) sind sie jeweils aktuell abzurufen. Insgesamt wachse die »Ökonomisierung des Kinderweh«; gerade die für Kindermedien symptomatischen Medienverbundstrategien werden durch das Web enorm verstärkt, wie es umgekehrt von ihnen profitiert, sodass sich Werbung und Inhalt immer intensiver vermischen (und kaum das gesetzliche Gebot nach Trennung einhalten). Nicht-kommerzielle Angebote, die es gleichwohl in Fülle im Netz gibt, haben es gegenüber solch geballter Marktmacht zunehmend schwerer, überhaupt die Aufmerksamkeit der Kinder zu finden, das heißt, überhaupt von ihnen entdeckt zu werden. Denn Kinder diesen Alters, darin stimmen beide Studien überein, surfen im eigentlichen Sinne kaum; sie merken sich die Adressen (URLs) aus Zeitschriften, von Fernsehsendungen oder bekommen sie von Freunden. Nur selten suchen sie welche gezielt mittels Suchmaschinen oder Katalogen; und auch spezielle Kindersuchmaschinen wie die viel gelobte Blinde Kuh (www.blindekuh.de) kommen nur selten in ihr Gesichtsfeld. Auch Richter beginnt - wohl typisch Dissertation - recht allgemein, mit der Darstellung (kontroverser) Medienbegriffe, von Web-Geschichte und -funktionalitäten und gängigen Gestaltungskriterien, was für das eigentliche Thema nicht unbedingt erforderlich ist. Aufschlussreich für den bibliothekarischen Kontext sind hingegen ihre Ausführungen zur Lesekompetenz und ihre Relationen zu speziellen Internetkompetenzen, die die Autorin auch empirisch erhärten kann: Denn Kinder, die flüssig, gut und sicher lesen können, erfassen natürlich nicht nur die Web-Inhalte besser, sie finden sich auch schneller auf den Web-Seiten zurecht und erkennen deren Strukturen (Linkpfade, Navigationsleisten, Buttons und so weiter) leichter und genauer als die Leseschwächeren. Ob man solchen Umgang sogleich als kompetentes Informationsverhalten und Surf-Aktivität werten will oder nicht, ist wohl Definitionssache. Denn auch Richter räumt ein, dass die meisten Kinder vornehmlich über das Internet spielen oder aber ihnen schon bekannte Seiten für ihre Hobbys, über Stars, Musik und Chat aufrufen. Dabei ist ihnen vor allem das Design der Seiten wichtig: Bunt, mit Bildern und Fotos sollen sie gestaltet sein, aber nicht überladen und durch Animationen in ihrer Ladezeit zu langwierig. Fachliches Computerwissen haben die Kinder gemeinhin nicht, nur wenige Freaks brillieren mit nicht immer ganz begriffenem Vokabular; und sie brauchen es auch kaum, denn sie lernen den Internetumgang durch Zugucken und kurze Handling-Tipps von Eltern und älteren Kindern. Eine systematische Internetdidaktik, wie sie Richter fordert, wurde vor vier Jahren offenbar noch kaum praktiziert.
    Trial and Error Aber auch die DJI-Studie konstatiert drei Jahre später, dass gezieltes Anleiten der Kinder noch die ganz seltene Ausnahme ist. Das informelle Lernen, das allmähliche Hinweinwachsen in die erforderlichen Nutzungsweisen überwiegt. Nur wenige Erzieherinnen beschäftigen sich explizit damit, Lehrerinnen wurden aus Zeitgründen nicht befragt. Und für die Eltern wären attraktive Bildungsangebote mit der Intention zu empfehlen, die Medien- und Internetkompetenz ihrer Kinder zu fördern. Bislang sind die meisten Kinder weithin Autodidakten, die durch Trial and Errordas eine oder andere entdecken oder aber sich mit einmal eingeübten Routinen - etwa auf der Ebene der Computerspiele - begnügen. Denn so einfach und kinderleicht, wie auch Richter (S. 155) behauptet, sind die Bedienung der WebSoftware (Browser) und die Nutzung des Netzes nach Ansicht der DJI-ForscherInnen längst noch nicht: Da bedarf es neben technisch-instrumenteller auch noch kognitiv-analytischer Fähigkeiten, um sich zu orientieren, durch die Masse von Informationen, die vielfach belanglos oder irreführend und nur selten erschöpfend sind, sich durchzubeißen und endlich Verlässliches und Brauchbares in ansprechender Weise zu finden. Spätestens, wenn etwas nicht oder schief geht, sind die meisten Kinder- aberwohl nicht nur sie - ratlos und bedürfen der kompetenten Hilfe anderer. Und mit den vielen Tricks, Täuschungen und Manipulationsstrategien kommerzieller Websites-Werbung, Pop-Ups und Dialers - kommen Kinder kaum zurecht. Schon die vielen Anglizismen, vermeintlichen Jugendjargons und Fachtermini überfordern sie ebenso wie die zahlreichen Anmelde- und Registrierungsprozeduren, wo vielfach - wenn nicht gar datenschutzrechtliche - so doch Nützlichkeitsmaximen überschritten werden. Dafür bedürfte es nicht nur mehr und gründlicher pädagogischer Aufklärung; vielmehr könnten verantwortliche Website-Anbieter - gegen die Masse der Kommerzseiten - transparente, interaktive Hilfen, die selbsterklärend oder sogar -steuernd sind, implementieren. So könnten sich Qualitäts- und Kontrollmaßstäbe entwickeln, die die jugendlichen User dann auch an andere Seiten stellen. Denn Verbreitung, Nutzung und Bedeutung des Internet werden im Alltag und in der Kultur der Kinder gewiss wachsen. Bis es so selbstverständlich, vielseitig und problemlos genutzt werden kann, wie heute die nun schon »alten« Medien, ist es nach Einschätzung der DJI-AutorInnen noch ein gehöriges Stück Weges, den man pädagogisch besser und konstruktiver gestalten könnte. In solcher Aufgabenstellung stimmen beide Studien erneut überein."
    Footnote
    Rezensionen zu: Christine Feil, Regine Decker, Christoph Gieger: Wie entdecken Kinder das Internet? Beobachtungen bei 5- bis 12-jährigen Kindern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2004 (Schriften des Deutschen Jugendinstituts: Kinder). 254 Seiten: Illustrationen, grafische Darstellungen. Susanne Richter: Die Nutzung des Internets durch Kinder. Eine qualitative Studie zu internetspezifischen Nutzungsstrategien, Kompetenzen und Präferenzen von Kindern im Alter zwischen 11 und 13 Jahren. Frankfurt (Main) [u.a.]: Lang, 2004 (Kinder- und Jugendkultur, -literatur und -medien; 27). 299 Seiten: Illustrationen, grafische Darstellungen.
  13. Bilal, D.: Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine : I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact-based search tasks (2000) 0.01 
    0.009454718 = product of:
  0.06303145 = sum of:
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=4776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4776)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=4776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4776)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 4776) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=4776,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4776, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4776)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    This study reports on the first part of a research project that investigated children's cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors as they use the Yahooligans! search engine to find information on a specific search task. 27 seventh-grade science children from a middle school located in Knoxville, Tennessee participated in the period. Their cognitive and physical behaviors were captured using Lotus ScreenCam, a Windows based software package that captures and replays activities recorded in Web browsers, such as Netscape. Their affective states were captured via a one-on-one exit interview. A new measure called "Web traversal measure" was developed to measure children's "weighted" traversal effectiveness and efficiency scores, as well as their quality moves in Yahooligans! Children's prior experience in using the Internet/Web and their knowledge of the Yahooligans! interface were gathered via a questionnaire. The findings provided insights into children's bahviors and success, as their weighted traversal effectiveness and efficiency scores, as well as quality moves. Implications for user training and system design are discussed
  14. Whitmire, E.: ¬The relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs, reflective judgment, and their information-seeking behavior (2004) 0.01 
    0.009454718 = product of:
  0.06303145 = sum of:
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    During the fall 2001 semester 15 first-year undergraduates were interviewed about their information-seeking behavior. Undergraduates completed a short-answer questionnaire, the Measure of Epistemological Reflection, measuring their epistemological beliefs and searched the Web and an online public access catalog using tasks from the Reflective Judgment Interview that assessed their reflective judgment level. Undergraduates talked aloud while searching digital environments about the decisions they were making about the information they encountered while transaction analyses software (Lotus ScreenCam) recorded both their search moves and their decision-making through verbal protocol analysis. Analyses included examining the relationship between undergraduates' epistemological beliefs and reflective judgment and how they searched for information in these digital environments. Results indicated that there was a relationship between epistemological beliefs and reflective judgment and information-seeking behavior. Undergraduates' at higher stages of epistemological development exhibited the ability to handle conflicting information sources and to recognize authoritative information sources.
  15. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries (2008) 0.01 
    0.009454718 = product of:
  0.06303145 = sum of:
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
    0.021010485 = weight(_text_:software in 2091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021010485 = score(doc=2091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 2091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2091)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    In this paper, we define and present a comprehensive classification of user intent for Web searching. The classification consists of three hierarchical levels of informational, navigational, and transactional intent. After deriving attributes of each, we then developed a software application that automatically classified queries using a Web search engine log of over a million and a half queries submitted by several hundred thousand users. Our findings show that more than 80% of Web queries are informational in nature, with about 10% each being navigational and transactional. In order to validate the accuracy of our algorithm, we manually coded 400 queries and compared the results from this manual classification to the results determined by the automated method. This comparison showed that the automatic classification has an accuracy of 74%. Of the remaining 25% of the queries, the user intent is vague or multi-faceted, pointing to the need for probabilistic classification. We discuss how search engines can use knowledge of user intent to provide more targeted and relevant results in Web searching.
  16. Borgman, C.L.; Smart, L.J.; Millwood, K.A.; Finley, J.R.; Champeny, L.; Gilliland, A.J.; Leazer, G.H.: Comparing faculty information seeking in teaching and research : implications for the design of digital libraries (2005) 0.01 
    0.009131783 = product of:
  0.045658913 = sum of:
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
    0.014006989 = weight(_text_:software in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014006989 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.17532499 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
    0.0036379434 = product of:
      0.01091383 = sum of:
        0.01091383 = weight(_text_:22 in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01091383 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07052079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02013827 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Abstract
    ADEPT is a 5-year project whose goals are to develop, deploy, and evaluate inquiry learning capabilities for the Alexandria Digital Library, an extant digital library of primary sources in geography. We interviewed nine geography faculty members who teach undergraduate courses about their information seeking for research and teaching and their use of information resources in teaching. These data were supplemented by interviews with four faculty members from another ADEPT study about the nature of knowledge in geography. Among our key findings are that geography faculty are more likely to encounter useful teaching resources while seeking research resources than vice versa, although the influence goes in both directions. Their greatest information needs are for research data, maps, and images. They desire better searching by concept or theme, in addition to searching by location and place name. They make extensive use of their own research resources in their teaching. Among the implications for functionality and architecture of geographic digital libraries for educational use are that personal digital libraries are essential, because individual faculty members have personalized approaches to selecting, collecting, and organizing teaching resources. Digital library services for research and teaching should include the ability to import content from common office software and to store content in standard formats that can be exported to other applications. Digital library services can facilitate sharing among faculty but cannot overcome barriers such as intellectual property rights, access to proprietary research data, or the desire of individuals to maintain control over their own resources. Faculty use of primary and secondary resources needs to be better understood if we are to design successful digital libraries for research and teaching.
    Date
    3. 6.2005 20:40:22
  17. Tombros, T.; Crestani, F.: Users' perception of relevance of spoken documents (2000) 0.01 
    0.009003021 = product of:
  0.060020134 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 4996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=4996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 4996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4996)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    27. 8.2000 14:32:23
  18. Joinson, A.; Banyard, P.: Psychological aspects of information seeking on the Internet (2002) 0.01 
    0.009003021 = product of:
  0.060020134 = sum of:
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
    0.02000671 = weight(_text_:23 in 694) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02000671 = score(doc=694,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.27719048 = fieldWeight in 694, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=694)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    20. 1.2007 19:17:23
  19. Shenton, A.K.; Dixon, P.: ¬A comparison of youngsters' use of CD-ROM and the Internet as information resources (2003) 0.01 
    0.007878931 = product of:
  0.052526206 = sum of:
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
    0.017508736 = weight(_text_:software in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017508736 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07989157 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Abstract
    Little research has compared youngsters' use of CD-ROM and the Internet for information-seeking purposes. Nevertheless, the area has recently been addressed within a largely qualitative project more generally devoted to young people's information universes. Home access to the Internet was seen to be more limited than that to CD-ROM, although the former was consulted to tackle needs of a greater number of types. The strategies employed to exploit each form of information resource were essentially similar. No attempts were reported to check the credibility of any information retrieved from electronic sources. The Internet was, however, used more frequently beyond the informants' own homes than was CD-ROM. There was also greater employment of the Internet by adults acting an the youngsters' behalf. As Internet use for school purposes rose in accordance with age, that of CD-ROM declined. When youngsters themselves compared the two resources as information-seeking tools, CD-ROM software was criticized for its lack of detailed material and the Internet for the problems in locating what was desired. Project findings have implications in a range of areas, including the marketing of CD-ROM packages, research and development and practices within schools.
  20. Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Ellis, D.; Foster, A.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 2: uncertainty and Its correlates (2002) 0.01 
    0.007716874 = product of:
  0.051445827 = sum of:
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
    0.017148608 = weight(_text_:23 in 5232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017148608 = score(doc=5232,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.07217676 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02013827 = queryNorm
        0.23759183 = fieldWeight in 5232, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5840597 = idf(docFreq=3336, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5232)
  0.15 = coord(3/20)
    Date
    21. 7.2006 14:23:30

Authors

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 15

Types

  • a 62
  • b 1
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes