-
Neubauer, K.-W.: Informationsverhalten der Benutzer unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Kataloge (1979)
0.05
0.049986713 = product of:
0.099973425 = sum of:
0.099973425 = product of:
0.14996013 = sum of:
0.1407294 = weight(_text_:k in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1407294 = score(doc=4392,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.7808889 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 4392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=4392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4392)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.213-300
- Source
- Benutzerverhalten an deutschen Hochschulbibliotheken: Ergebnisse einer mit Unterstützung der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft durchgeführten vergleichenden Untersuchung. Hrsg.: K.-W. Neubauer
-
Kilgour, F.G.: Known-item online searches employed by scholars using surnames plus first, or last, or first and last title words (2001)
0.05
0.045619894 = sum of:
0.04408144 = product of:
0.17632575 = sum of:
0.17632575 = weight(_text_:author's in 6932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17632575 = score(doc=6932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33926067 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.51973534 = fieldWeight in 6932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6932)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.001538456 = product of:
0.004615368 = sum of:
0.004615368 = weight(_text_:s in 6932) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004615368 = score(doc=6932,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 6932, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6932)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This experiment explores the effectiveness of retrieving the listing of a known-item book from the 3.6 million entry onine catalog at the library of the University of Michigan using various combinations of author's name plus first and last title words. The principal finding was that 98.9% of the time a 1 to 20 line miniature catalog (minicat) was displayed that contained either the entry sought or a not-in-database (NID) reply when the search comprised all three words.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.14, S.1203-1209
-
Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999)
0.05
0.045187347 = sum of:
0.025189394 = product of:
0.10075758 = sum of:
0.10075758 = weight(_text_:author's in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10075758 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33926067 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.29699162 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.019997954 = product of:
0.02999693 = sum of:
0.002637353 = weight(_text_:s in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002637353 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.027359577 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027359577 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- This paper highlights some of the significant findings from author's PhD: "Factors affecting the end-use of electronic databases in public libraries." Public libraries have a wide range of different types of users who, unlike academic or special library users, are not necessarily information-trained (see Coles, 1998). Whereas the academic, special library user may have specific information needs that can be met by electronic sources, public library users do not necessarily have such specific information needs that can easily be identified and met. Most user surveys have tended to concentrate on the searching and retrieval aspect of information seeking behaviour, whereas this study's user survey focused more on how people perceived and related to Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs). It was not how people searched a particular electronic source, in this case CD-ROM, that was of prime interest but rather whether or not people actually used them at all and the reasons why people did or did not use electronic media. There were several reasons the study looked at CD-ROM specifically. Firstly, CD-ROM is a well established technology, most people should be familiar with CD-ROM/multimedia. Secondly, CD-ROM was, at the start of the study, the only open access electronic media widely available in public libraries. As well as examining why public library users chose to use electronic sources, the paper looks at the types of CD-ROM databases used both in the library and in general Also examined are what sort of searches users carried out. Where appropriate some of the problems inherent in studying end-users in public libraries and the difficulty in getting reliable data, are discussed. Several methods were used to collect the data. I wished to avoid limiting research to a small sample of library sites, the aim was to be as broad in scope as possible. There were two main groups of people 1 wished to look at: non-users as well as CD-ROM users
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 8:51:28
- Pages
- S.321-329
-
Markey, K.: Users and the online catalog : subject access problems (1986)
0.04
0.041425318 = product of:
0.082850635 = sum of:
0.082850635 = product of:
0.124275945 = sum of:
0.113726534 = weight(_text_:k in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113726534 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.010549412 = weight(_text_:s in 342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010549412 = score(doc=342,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 342, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=342)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.35-69
-
Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1983)
0.04
0.041425318 = product of:
0.082850635 = sum of:
0.082850635 = product of:
0.124275945 = sum of:
0.113726534 = weight(_text_:k in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.113726534 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.63105357 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.010549412 = weight(_text_:s in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010549412 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19219826 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 2(1983), S.381-387
-
Andersson, R.; Holst, E.: Indexes and other depictions of fictions : a new model for analysis empirically tested (1996)
0.04
0.03910277 = sum of:
0.037784092 = product of:
0.15113637 = sum of:
0.15113637 = weight(_text_:author's in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15113637 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33926067 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.44548744 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0013186766 = product of:
0.0039560297 = sum of:
0.0039560297 = weight(_text_:s in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0039560297 = score(doc=473,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- In this study descriptions of a novel by 100 users at 2 Swedish public libraries, Malmö and Molndal, Mar-Apr 95, were compared to the index terms used for the novels at these libraries. Describes previous systems for fiction indexing, the 2 libraries, and the users interviewed. Compares the AMP system with their own model. The latter operates with terms under the headings phenomena, frame and author's intention. The similarities between the users' and indexers' descriptions were sufficiently close to make it possible to retrieve fiction in accordance with users' wishes in Molndal, and would have been in Malmö, had more books been indexed with more terms. Sometimes the similarities were close enough for users to retrieve fiction on their own
- Source
- Svensk biblioteks forskning. 1996, nos.2/3, S.77-95
-
Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999)
0.04
0.03651785 = product of:
0.0730357 = sum of:
0.0730357 = sum of:
0.03553954 = weight(_text_:k in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03553954 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.0032966915 = weight(_text_:s in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032966915 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.034199473 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034199473 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2002 9:55:52
- Pages
- S.82-95
-
Aula, A.; Nordhausen, K.: Modeling successful performance in Web searching (2006)
0.04
0.03651785 = product of:
0.0730357 = sum of:
0.0730357 = sum of:
0.03553954 = weight(_text_:k in 6117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03553954 = score(doc=6117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 6117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6117)
0.0032966915 = weight(_text_:s in 6117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032966915 = score(doc=6117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 6117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6117)
0.034199473 = weight(_text_:22 in 6117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034199473 = score(doc=6117,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6117, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6117)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Several previous studies have measured differences in the information search success of novices and experts. However, the definitions of novices and experts have varied greatly between the studies, and so have the measures used for search success. Instead of dividing the searchers into different groups based on their expertise, we chose to model search success with task completion speed, TCS. Towards this goal, 22 participants performed three fact-finding tasks and two broader tasks in an observational user study. In our model, there were two variables related to the Web experience of the participants. Other variables included, for example, the speed of query iteration, the length of the queries, the proportion of precise queries, and the speed of evaluating result documents. Our results showed that the variables related to Web experience had expected effects on TCS. The increase in the years of Web use was related to improvement in TCS in the broader tasks, whereas the less frequent Web use was related to a decrease in TCS in the fact-finding tasks. Other variables having significant effects on TCS in either of the task types were the speed of composing queries, the average number of query terms per query, the proportion of precise queries, and the participants' own evaluation of their search skills. In addition to the statistical models, we present several qualitative findings of the participants' search strategies. These results give valuable insight into the successful strategies in Web search beyond the previous knowledge of the expert-novice differences.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.12, S.1678-1693
-
Bauer, K.: Who goes where? : Measuring library Web site usage (2000)
0.04
0.036247153 = product of:
0.072494306 = sum of:
0.072494306 = product of:
0.108741455 = sum of:
0.09951072 = weight(_text_:k in 104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951072 = score(doc=104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=104)
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=104,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 104, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=104)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online. 24(2000) no.3, S.25-31
-
Cochrane, P.A.; Markey, K.: Catalog use studies : since the introduction of online interactive catalogs, impact on design for subject access (1983)
0.04
0.036247153 = product of:
0.072494306 = sum of:
0.072494306 = product of:
0.108741455 = sum of:
0.09951072 = weight(_text_:k in 7676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951072 = score(doc=7676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 7676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7676)
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 7676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=7676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7676)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 5(1983), S.337-363
-
Collins, K.: Providing subject access to images : a study of user queries (1998)
0.04
0.036247153 = product of:
0.072494306 = sum of:
0.072494306 = product of:
0.108741455 = sum of:
0.09951072 = weight(_text_:k in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09951072 = score(doc=4554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.5521719 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 4554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=4554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 4554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4554)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- American archivist. 61(1998) no.1, S.36-55
-
Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000)
0.03
0.03499642 = product of:
0.06999284 = sum of:
0.06999284 = product of:
0.10498925 = sum of:
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
0.09575852 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575852 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2000 17:52:11
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.1, S.39-46
-
Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000)
0.03
0.03499642 = product of:
0.06999284 = sum of:
0.06999284 = product of:
0.10498925 = sum of:
0.009230736 = weight(_text_:s in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009230736 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
0.09575852 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09575852 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
-
Tang, M.-C.: Browsing and searching in a faceted information space : a naturalistic study of PubMed users' interaction with a display tool (2007)
0.03
0.03258564 = sum of:
0.031486742 = product of:
0.12594697 = sum of:
0.12594697 = weight(_text_:author's in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12594697 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.33926067 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.0010988972 = product of:
0.0032966915 = sum of:
0.0032966915 = weight(_text_:s in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0032966915 = score(doc=617,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The study adopts a naturalistic approach to investigate users' interaction with a browsable MeSH (medical subject headings) display designed to facilitate query construction for the PubMed bibliographic database. The purpose of the study is twofold: first, to test the usefulness of a browsable interface utilizing the principle of faceted classification; and second, to investigate users' preferred query submission methods in different problematic situations. An interface that incorporated multiple query submission methods - the conventional single-line query box as well as methods associated the faceted classification display was constructed. Participants' interactions with the interface were monitored remotely over a period of 10 weeks; information about their problematic situations and information retrieval behaviors were also collected during this time. The traditional controlled experiment was not adequate in answering the author's research questions; hence, the author provides his rationale for a naturalistic approach. The study's findings show that there is indeed a selective compatibility between query submission methods provided by the MeSH display and users' problematic situations. The query submission methods associated with the display were found to be the preferred search tools when users' information needs were vague and the search topics unfamiliar. The findings support the theoretical proposition that users engaging in an information retrieval process with a variety of problematic situations need different approaches. The author argues that rather than treat the information retrieval system as a general purpose tool, more attention should be given to the interaction between the functionality of the tool and the characteristics of users' problematic situations.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.13, S.1998-2006
-
Franken, K.: Einige Probleme benutzerorientierter Sacherschließung : dargestellt an Recherchemitschnitten der Universitätsbibliothek Konstanz (1990)
0.03
0.031068988 = product of:
0.062137976 = sum of:
0.062137976 = product of:
0.093206964 = sum of:
0.0852949 = weight(_text_:k in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0852949 = score(doc=2279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.007912059 = weight(_text_:s in 2279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007912059 = score(doc=2279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2279)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.129-145
-
Gläser, C.; Kranz, B.; Lück, K.: "Das wissen wir doch am besten, was die Benutzer wollen" : oder: Fokusgruppeninterviews mit Bibliotheksbenutzern zum Thema 'Elektronische Informationsvermittlung im BIS Oldenburg'. Ein Erfahrungsbericht (1998)
0.03
0.031068988 = product of:
0.062137976 = sum of:
0.062137976 = product of:
0.093206964 = sum of:
0.0852949 = weight(_text_:k in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0852949 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.47329018 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
0.007912059 = weight(_text_:s in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007912059 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.11, S.1912-1921
-
Yoo, E.-Y.; Robbins, L.S.: Understanding middle-aged women's health information seeking on the web : a theoretical approach (2008)
0.03
0.02999693 = product of:
0.05999386 = sum of:
0.05999386 = product of:
0.08999079 = sum of:
0.007912059 = weight(_text_:s in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007912059 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.082078725 = weight(_text_:22 in 2973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.082078725 = score(doc=2973,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2973, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2973)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 2.2008 17:52:22
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.4, S.577-590
-
Griesbaum, J.; Mahrholz, N.; Kiedrowski, K. von Löwe; Rittberger, M.: Knowledge generation in online forums : a case study in the German educational domain (2015)
0.03
0.029214282 = product of:
0.058428563 = sum of:
0.058428563 = sum of:
0.028431633 = weight(_text_:k in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028431633 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.15776339 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
0.002637353 = weight(_text_:s in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002637353 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
0.027359577 = weight(_text_:22 in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027359577 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1767866 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.1, S.2-26
-
Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1993)
0.03
0.02680118 = product of:
0.05360236 = sum of:
0.05360236 = product of:
0.08040354 = sum of:
0.07107908 = weight(_text_:k in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07107908 = score(doc=5805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
0.009324451 = weight(_text_:s in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009324451 = score(doc=5805,freq=4.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.16988087 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Reprinted from: Information technology and libraries 2(1983) no.4, S.381-387
- Source
- Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.1, S.87-92
-
Williamson, K.: ¬The information needs and information-seeking behavior of older adults : an Australian study (1997)
0.03
0.025890823 = product of:
0.051781647 = sum of:
0.051781647 = product of:
0.07767247 = sum of:
0.07107908 = weight(_text_:k in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07107908 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18021692 = queryWeight, product of:
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.39440846 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.006593383 = weight(_text_:s in 993) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006593383 = score(doc=993,freq=2.0), product of:
0.054888178 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.05048407 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 993, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=993)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.337-350
