Search (162 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Cole, C.; Leide, J.; Beheshti, J.; Large, A.; Brooks, M.: Investigating the Anomalous States of Knowledge hypothesis in a real-life problem situation : a study of history and psychology undergraduates seeking information for a course essay (2005) 0.06
    0.05917719 = sum of:
      0.022419272 = product of:
        0.08967709 = sum of:
          0.08967709 = weight(_text_:authors in 4814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08967709 = score(doc=4814,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4814, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4814)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.036757916 = product of:
        0.055136874 = sum of:
          0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 4814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03630372 = score(doc=4814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 4814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4814)
          0.018833151 = weight(_text_:h in 4814) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.018833151 = score(doc=4814,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 4814, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4814)
        0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors present a study of the real-life information needs of 59 McGill University undergraduates researching essay topics for either a history or psychology course, interviewed just after they had selected their essay topic. The interview's purpose was to transform the undergraduate's query from general topic terms, based an vague conceptions of their essay topic, to an information need-based query. To chart the transformation, the authors investigate N. J. Belkin, R. N. Oddy, and H. M. Brooks' Anomalous States of Knowledge (ASK) hypothesis (1982a, 1982b), which links the user's ASK to a relevant document set via a common code based an structural facets. In the present study an interoperable structural code based an eight essay styles is created, then notions of structural facets compatible with a highimpact essay structure are presented. The important findings of the study are: (a) the undergraduates' topic statements and terms derived from it do not constitute an effective information need statement because for most of the subjects in the study the topic terms conformed to a low-impact essay style; (b) essay style is an effective interoperable structural code for charting the evolution of the undergraduate's knowledge state from ASK to partial resolution of the ASK in an information need statement.
  2. Jörgensen, C.; Liddy, E.D.: Information access or information anxiety? : an explanatory evaluation of book index features (1996) 0.06
    0.05590812 = sum of:
      0.03170564 = product of:
        0.12682256 = sum of:
          0.12682256 = weight(_text_:authors in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12682256 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.50368255 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.02420248 = product of:
        0.07260744 = sum of:
          0.07260744 = weight(_text_:c in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07260744 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.381109 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors conducted a controlled user study in both print and electronic environments and present here a subset of results from index use in the print format
  3. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.05
    0.052498832 = product of:
      0.104997665 = sum of:
        0.104997665 = product of:
          0.1574965 = sum of:
            0.052732818 = weight(_text_:h in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052732818 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
            0.10476368 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10476368 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 34(2000) H.1, S.39-46
  4. Stachnik, I.: Benutzerbefragungen in Bibliotheken : Grundlagen, Methoden, Beispiele (1995) 0.05
    0.051461082 = product of:
      0.102922164 = sum of:
        0.102922164 = product of:
          0.15438324 = sum of:
            0.10165042 = weight(_text_:c in 4363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10165042 = score(doc=4363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.5335526 = fieldWeight in 4363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4363)
            0.052732818 = weight(_text_:h in 4363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052732818 = score(doc=4363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.38429362 = fieldWeight in 4363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4363)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: ProLibris 1996, H.1, S.54 (C. Bartel)
  5. Gläser, C.; Kranz, B.; Lück, K.: "Das wissen wir doch am besten, was die Benutzer wollen" : oder: Fokusgruppeninterviews mit Bibliotheksbenutzern zum Thema 'Elektronische Informationsvermittlung im BIS Oldenburg'. Ein Erfahrungsbericht (1998) 0.04
    0.044109493 = product of:
      0.08821899 = sum of:
        0.08821899 = product of:
          0.13232848 = sum of:
            0.08712893 = weight(_text_:c in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08712893 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.45733082 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
            0.04519956 = weight(_text_:h in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04519956 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 32(1998) H.11, S.1912-1921
  6. Sage, C.; Klaas, J.; Spalding, H.H.; Robinson, T.: ¬A queueing study of public catalog use (1981) 0.04
    0.039135683 = sum of:
      0.022193946 = product of:
        0.088775784 = sum of:
          0.088775784 = weight(_text_:authors in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.088775784 = score(doc=2167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016941737 = product of:
        0.05082521 = sum of:
          0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05082521 = score(doc=2167,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors conducted a six-week queueing study of public catalogs in the Iowa State University library system. Data gathered are analyzed primarily to determine if routinely gathered library statistics can validly be used to predict catalog usage, to discover the ratio between the usage of the card catalog and the serials catalog, and to pinpoint the time of peak card catalog usage in order to measure more closely the rate of use. This measurement, then, provides one factor in a simulation model that can be constructed to predict accurately the number of devices needed for an alternative catalog format
  7. Alexander, B.B.; Gyeszly, S.D.: OPAC or card catalog : patrons preference in an academic library (1991) 0.04
    0.039135683 = sum of:
      0.022193946 = product of:
        0.088775784 = sum of:
          0.088775784 = weight(_text_:authors in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.088775784 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.016941737 = product of:
        0.05082521 = sum of:
          0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05082521 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Since the closing of the Sterling C. Evans Library author/title card catalog on march 6, 1989, librarians have observed a number of patrons who continued to use that catalog, even though NOTIS, the OPAC offered more comprehensive and current access to library holdings. To determine the reasons for this use, the authors prepared a one-page questionnaire, focusing on the users' preference for an inadequate card catalog in an environment which offers a superior OPAC. Card catalog patrons were then surveyed in order to gather data and build a user profile. Survey results were tabulated and analyzed, revealing the underlying reasons for users' preference for the card or online catalog. Conclusions will provide direction for improvements in users' access to online catalogs
  8. Yi, K.; Beheshti, J.; Cole, C.; Leide, J.E.; Large, A.: User search behavior of domain-specific information retrieval systems : an analysis of the query logs from PsycINFO and ABC-Clio's Historical Abstracts/America: History and Life (2006) 0.03
    0.034520514 = sum of:
      0.022419272 = product of:
        0.08967709 = sum of:
          0.08967709 = weight(_text_:authors in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08967709 = score(doc=197,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
        0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.01210124 = product of:
        0.03630372 = sum of:
          0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03630372 = score(doc=197,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05523161 = queryNorm
              0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 197, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=197)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report the findings of a study that analyzes and compares the query logs of PsycINFO for psychology and the two history databases of ABC-Clio: Historical Abstracts and America: History and Life to establish the sociological nature of information need, searching, and seeking in history versus psychology. Two problems are addressed: (a) What level of query log analysis - by individual query terms, by co-occurrence of word pairs, or by multiword terms (MWTs) - best serves as data for categorizing the queries to these two subject-bound databases; and (b) how can the differences in the nature of the queries to history versus psychology databases aid in our understanding of user search behavior and the information needs of their respective users. The authors conclude that MWTs provide the most effective snapshot of user searching behavior for query categorization. The MWTs to ABC-Clio indicate specific instances of historical events, people, and regions, whereas the MWTs to PsycINFO indicate concepts roughly equivalent to descriptors used by PsycINFO's own classification scheme. The average length of queries is 3.16 terms for PsycINFO and 3.42 for ABC-Clio, which breaks from findings for other reference and scholarly search engine studies, bringing query length closer in line to findings for general Web search engines like Excite.
  9. Tomney, H.; Burton, P.F.: Electronic journals : a case study of usage and attitudes among academics (1998) 0.03
    0.029999336 = product of:
      0.059998672 = sum of:
        0.059998672 = product of:
          0.08999801 = sum of:
            0.03013304 = weight(_text_:h in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03013304 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
            0.059864964 = weight(_text_:22 in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059864964 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:07:29
  10. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.03
    0.029999336 = product of:
      0.059998672 = sum of:
        0.059998672 = product of:
          0.08999801 = sum of:
            0.03013304 = weight(_text_:h in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03013304 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
            0.059864964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059864964 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 56(2009) H.1, S.9-19
  11. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Query expansion behavior within a thesaurus-enhanced search environment : a user-centered evaluation (2006) 0.03
    0.029585605 = product of:
      0.05917121 = sum of:
        0.05917121 = product of:
          0.088756815 = sum of:
            0.051341217 = weight(_text_:c in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051341217 = score(doc=56,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.2694848 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
            0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0374156 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The study reported here investigated the query expansion behavior of end-users interacting with a thesaurus-enhanced search system on the Web. Two groups, namely academic staff and postgraduate students, were recruited into this study. Data were collected from 90 searches performed by 30 users using the OVID interface to the CAB abstracts database. Data-gathering techniques included questionnaires, screen capturing software, and interviews. The results presented here relate to issues of search-topic and search-term characteristics, number and types of expanded queries, usefulness of thesaurus terms, and behavioral differences between academic staff and postgraduate students in their interaction. The key conclusions drawn were that (a) academic staff chose more narrow and synonymous terms than did postgraduate students, who generally selected broader and related terms; (b) topic complexity affected users' interaction with the thesaurus in that complex topics required more query expansion and search term selection; (c) users' prior topic-search experience appeared to have a significant effect on their selection and evaluation of thesaurus terms; (d) in 50% of the searches where additional terms were suggested from the thesaurus, users stated that they had not been aware of the terms at the beginning of the search; this observation was particularly noticeable in the case of postgraduate students.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:32:43
  12. Okoli, C.; Mehdi, M.; Mesgari, M.; Nielsen, F.A.; Lanamäki, A.: Wikipedia in the eyes of its beholders : a systematic review of scholarly research on Wikipedia readers and readership (2014) 0.03
    0.02948773 = product of:
      0.05897546 = sum of:
        0.05897546 = product of:
          0.08846319 = sum of:
            0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043564465 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
            0.04489872 = weight(_text_:22 in 1540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04489872 = score(doc=1540,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1540, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1540)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    18.11.2014 13:22:03
  13. Lee, H.-L.: Navigating hierarchies vs. searching by keyword : two cultural perspectives (2006) 0.03
    0.025730541 = product of:
      0.051461082 = sum of:
        0.051461082 = product of:
          0.07719162 = sum of:
            0.05082521 = weight(_text_:c in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05082521 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.2667763 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
            0.026366409 = weight(_text_:h in 239) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026366409 = score(doc=239,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 239, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=239)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a global learning society: Proceedings of the 9th International ISKO Conference, 4-7 July 2006, Vienna, Austria. Hrsg.: G. Budin, C. Swertz u. K. Mitgutsch
  14. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.02
    0.024573108 = product of:
      0.049146216 = sum of:
        0.049146216 = product of:
          0.07371932 = sum of:
            0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03630372 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
            0.0374156 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0374156 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  15. Yuan, W.; Meadow, C.T.: ¬A study of the use of variables in information retrieval user studies (1999) 0.02
    0.022193946 = product of:
      0.044387892 = sum of:
        0.044387892 = product of:
          0.17755157 = sum of:
            0.17755157 = weight(_text_:authors in 2943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17755157 = score(doc=2943,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.25179064 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.70515555 = fieldWeight in 2943, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2943)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on an exploratory study of the measurement of commonality in the use of variables or measures by authors and groups of authors who have reported on studies of information retrieval system users. There is some similarity to co-citation analysis in that, when 2 individual papers, or 2 authors of sveral works, use the same variables, this indicates a similarity in approach to the subject. Such usage may be a stroger indication of similarity than co-citation be cause it represents what the authors did, rather than what they say
  16. Zhang, D.; Zambrowicz, C.; Zhou, H.; Roderer, N.K.: User information seeking behavior in a medical Web portal environment : a preliminary study (2004) 0.02
    0.022054747 = product of:
      0.044109493 = sum of:
        0.044109493 = product of:
          0.06616424 = sum of:
            0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043564465 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
            0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02259978 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  17. Knautz, K.; Dröge, E.; Finkelmeyer, S.; Guschauski, D.; Juchem, K.; Krzmyk, C.; Miskovic, D.; Schiefer, J.; Sen, E.; Verbina, J.; Werner, N.; Stock, W.G.: Indexieren von Emotionen bei Videos (2010) 0.02
    0.022054747 = product of:
      0.044109493 = sum of:
        0.044109493 = product of:
          0.06616424 = sum of:
            0.043564465 = weight(_text_:c in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043564465 = score(doc=3637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
            0.02259978 = weight(_text_:h in 3637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02259978 = score(doc=3637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 3637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3637)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 61(2010) H.4, S.221-236
  18. Coles, C.: Information seeking behaviour of public library users : use and non-use of electronic media (1999) 0.02
    0.019658487 = product of:
      0.039316975 = sum of:
        0.039316975 = product of:
          0.05897546 = sum of:
            0.029042976 = weight(_text_:c in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029042976 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.1524436 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
            0.029932482 = weight(_text_:22 in 286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029932482 = score(doc=286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19341168 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=286)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2002 8:51:28
  19. Kern-Simirenko, C.: OPAC user logs : implications for bibliographic instruction (1983) 0.02
    0.019361984 = product of:
      0.038723968 = sum of:
        0.038723968 = product of:
          0.116171904 = sum of:
            0.116171904 = weight(_text_:c in 5260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.116171904 = score(doc=5260,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.6097744 = fieldWeight in 5260, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5260)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  20. Pu, H.-T.; Chuang, S.-L.; Yang, C.: Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests (2002) 0.02
    0.018378958 = product of:
      0.036757916 = sum of:
        0.036757916 = product of:
          0.055136874 = sum of:
            0.03630372 = weight(_text_:c in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03630372 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1905162 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.1905545 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
            0.018833151 = weight(_text_:h in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.018833151 = score(doc=587,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13722013 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05523161 = queryNorm
                0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 124
  • d 32
  • chi 2
  • nl 2
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 153
  • m 4
  • r 3
  • el 2
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…