Search (81 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: Do patrons understand Library of Congress Subject Headings? (1999) 0.03
    0.030837996 = product of:
      0.15418997 = sum of:
        0.15418997 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15418997 = score(doc=6072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19127488 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031459082 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.: Interpreting the findings of "A study of library users and their understanding of subject headings" (1999) 0.03
    0.030837996 = product of:
      0.15418997 = sum of:
        0.15418997 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15418997 = score(doc=6178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19127488 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031459082 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6178)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  3. Warner, A.J.: ¬A reaction to the findings of "A study of library users and their understanding of subject headings" (1999) 0.03
    0.030837996 = product of:
      0.15418997 = sum of:
        0.15418997 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15418997 = score(doc=6794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19127488 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031459082 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6794)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  4. Klugman, S.: Failures in subject retrieval (1989) 0.02
    0.019029431 = product of:
      0.095147155 = sum of:
        0.095147155 = product of:
          0.28544146 = sum of:
            0.28544146 = weight(_text_:pr in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28544146 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22538191 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                1.266479 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Binghampton, NY : Haworth Pr.
  5. Fussler, H.H.; Siman, J.L.: Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries (1969) 0.02
    0.019029431 = product of:
      0.095147155 = sum of:
        0.095147155 = product of:
          0.28544146 = sum of:
            0.28544146 = weight(_text_:pr in 4490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.28544146 = score(doc=4490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22538191 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                1.266479 = fieldWeight in 4490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4490)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Pr.
  6. Zimmerman, N.: User study: implementation of OCLC FAST subject headings in the Lafayette digital repository (2023) 0.02
    0.017988829 = product of:
      0.08994415 = sum of:
        0.08994415 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08994415 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19127488 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.031459082 = queryNorm
            0.47023502 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.01
    0.014272073 = product of:
      0.071360365 = sum of:
        0.071360365 = product of:
          0.2140811 = sum of:
            0.2140811 = weight(_text_:pr in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2140811 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.22538191 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.94985926 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Binghampton, NY : Haworth Pr.
  8. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.011708601 = product of:
      0.029271502 = sum of:
        0.023943663 = product of:
          0.07183099 = sum of:
            0.07183099 = weight(_text_:themes in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07183099 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20225134 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0053278394 = product of:
          0.021311358 = sum of:
            0.021311358 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021311358 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110164344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  9. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.01
    0.011708601 = product of:
      0.029271502 = sum of:
        0.023943663 = product of:
          0.07183099 = sum of:
            0.07183099 = weight(_text_:themes in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07183099 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20225134 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0053278394 = product of:
          0.021311358 = sum of:
            0.021311358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021311358 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110164344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a qualitative research study that examined professional image users' knowledge of, and interest in using, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems in an attempt to clarify when and where CBIR methods might be applied. The research sought to determine the differences in the perceived usefulness of CBIR technologies among image user groups from several domains and explicate the reasons given regarding the utility of CBIR systems for their professional tasks. Twenty participants (archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists), individuals who rely on images of cultural materials in the performance of their work, took part in the study. The findings of the study reveal that interest in CBIR methods varied among the different professional user communities. Individuals who showed an interest in these systems were primarily those concerned with the formal characteristics (i.e., color, shape, composition, and texture) of the images being sought. In contrast, those participants who expressed a strong interest in images of known items, images illustrating themes, and/or items from specific locations believe concept-based searches to be the most direct route. These image users did not see a practical application for CBIR systems in their current work routines.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  10. Haas, S.W.: Improving the search environment : informed decision making in the search for statistical information (2003) 0.01
    0.008525331 = product of:
      0.042626653 = sum of:
        0.042626653 = product of:
          0.17050661 = sum of:
            0.17050661 = weight(_text_:arge in 1687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17050661 = score(doc=1687,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.31160623 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.54718614 = fieldWeight in 1687, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1687)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    A search for information can be viewed as a series of decisions made by the searcher. Two dimensions of the search environment affect a user's decisions: the user's knowledge, and the configuration of the information retrieval system. Drawing an previous findings an users' lack of search or domain knowledge, this article investigates what the user needs to know to make informed search decisions at the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Web site, which provides statistical information an labor and related topics. Its extensive Web site is a rich collection of statistical information, ranging from individual statistics such as the current Consumer Price Index (CM), to a [arge statistical database called LABSTAT that can be queried to construct a tabie or time series an the fly. Two models of the search environment and the query process in LABSTAT are presented. They provide complementary views of the decision points at which help may be needed, and also suggest useful help content. Extensive examples based an the industry concept illustrate how the information could assist users' search decisions. The article concludes with a discussion of the role of help facilities in Web searching, and the interesting question of how to initiate the provision of help.
  11. Thissen, F.: Verloren in digitalen Netzen : Nutzertests zur Optimierung der Bedienerfreundlichkei eines Online-Katalogs (2002) 0.01
    0.007943512 = product of:
      0.01985878 = sum of:
        0.012884151 = product of:
          0.038652454 = sum of:
            0.038652454 = weight(_text_:f in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038652454 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12538917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.3082599 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0069746287 = product of:
          0.027898515 = sum of:
            0.027898515 = weight(_text_:einer in 243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027898515 = score(doc=243,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.106527574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.26189008 = fieldWeight in 243, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=243)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen einer Überarbeitung und Erweiterung des Internet-Auftritts der Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart wurde die Bedienerfreundlichkeit (usability) des Online-Katalogs (OPAC) der Bücherei wissenschaftlich getestet, um daraus Kriterien für eine mögliche Verbesserung herauszuarbeiten. Anfragen von Nutzern der Bibliothek und Beobachtungen der Bibliotheksmitarbeiterinnen hatten in der Vergangenheit deutlich gemacht, dass es offensichtlich nicht allen Nutzern problemlos möglich ist, den Katalog effektiv und angemessen zu nutzen. Da es sich beim webbasierten Online-Katalog um das Kernstück der Website der Bibliothek handelt, hatte seine Optimierung größte Priorität. Das Ziel sollte sein, einen Katalog anzubieten, der von sämtlichen potentiellen Nutzern mit den unterschiedlichsten Vorkenntnissen mit möglichst geringem Aufwand und einem optimalen Suchergebnis bedient werden kann.
  12. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.01
    0.007918898 = product of:
      0.03959449 = sum of:
        0.03959449 = product of:
          0.07918898 = sum of:
            0.04509081 = weight(_text_:einer in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04509081 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.106527574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.4232783 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
            0.03409817 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409817 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110164344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  13. Kaltenborn, K.-F.: Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Datenbank Medline : T.1: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Nutzungscharakteristika, Bewertung der Rechercheergebnisse und künftige Informationsgewinnung; T.2: Evaluations- und Benutzerforschung über Recherchequalität und Nutzer-Computer/Datenbank-Interaktion (1991) 0.01
    0.006808725 = product of:
      0.017021812 = sum of:
        0.011043559 = product of:
          0.033130676 = sum of:
            0.033130676 = weight(_text_:f in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033130676 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12538917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.26422277 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0059782537 = product of:
          0.023913015 = sum of:
            0.023913015 = weight(_text_:einer in 5105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023913015 = score(doc=5105,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.106527574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.22447723 = fieldWeight in 5105, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5105)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Einführung von CD-ROM Datenbanken als neue Informationstechnologie hat die Formen der Informationsgewinnung in bestimmten wissenschaftlichen Fachgebieten grundlegend geändert. Der Beitrag berichtet über Ergebnisse wissenschaftlicher Begleitforschung bei Endnutzerrecherchen in der CD-ROM-Version der Datenbank MEDLINE. Hierzu wurden drei verschiedene Erhebungen durchgeführt. Hiernach ist die überwiegende Zahl der Endnutzer (89,3%) mit dem jeweiligen Rechercheresultat zufrieden, wobei Benutzer mit geringer Rechercheerfahrung eine höhere Zufriedenheitsrate erreichen als Benutzer mit umfangreicheren Recherchekenntnissen. Die Gründe zur Nutzung von CD-ROM-Systemen resultieren voriwegend aus der klinischen Alltagsroutine oder täglichen Forschungspraxis, während vermittelte Online-Literatursuchen tendenziell häufiger im Zusammenhang mit einmaligen Ereignissen der wissenschaftlichen Aus- und Weiterbildung stehen. Die selbständige CD-ROM Literaturrecherche stellt für die befragten Ärzte und Wissenschaftler die bevorzugte Methode der Informationsgewinnung dar. Die analysierten Endnutzerrecherchen weisen allerdings Fehler und Defizite hinsichtlich einer optimalen Suchstrategie auf, die zu unbemerktn Informationsverlusten und zu Fehlbeurteilungen des wissenschaftlichen Kenntnisstandes führen
  14. Gremett, P.: Utilizing a user's context to improve search results (2006) 0.01
    0.0065982193 = product of:
      0.032991096 = sum of:
        0.032991096 = product of:
          0.06598219 = sum of:
            0.03188402 = weight(_text_:einer in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03188402 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.106527574 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.29930297 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3862264 = idf(docFreq=4066, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
            0.03409817 = weight(_text_:22 in 5299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03409817 = score(doc=5299,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110164344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5299, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5299)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:17:44
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einer Special Section "Perspectives on Search User Interfaces: Best Practices and Future Visions"
  15. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.0058123223 = product of:
      0.014530806 = sum of:
        0.0092029665 = product of:
          0.027608898 = sum of:
            0.027608898 = weight(_text_:f in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027608898 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12538917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.0053278394 = product of:
          0.021311358 = sum of:
            0.021311358 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021311358 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.110164344 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  16. Zeitlyn, D.; Bex, J.; David, M.: Making sense of online information (1997) 0.01
    0.005746479 = product of:
      0.028732395 = sum of:
        0.028732395 = product of:
          0.08619718 = sum of:
            0.08619718 = weight(_text_:themes in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08619718 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20225134 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents some results from research into the uses and usefulness of electronic bibliographic databases in academic contexts, carried out as part of a British Library funded research project. Ethnographic and focus group data was gathered initially in 3 departments (natural science, social science and humanities) at the University of Kent at Canterbury covering all academic staff, researchers and postgraduates. This was then expanded to postgraduates and staff in the same 3 disciplines at other universities. 5 themes from this research are outlined: who uses the system, who does not, and where are these activities and inactivities happening; where does formal training occur; and where does learning occur. The problems of interface between computer systems and users often mirrored that between library enquiry staff and users where users did not know to frame questions and the advice given was not in a form understood by the users
  17. Bawden, D.; Vilar, P.: Digital libraries : to meet or manage user expectations (2006) 0.01
    0.005746479 = product of:
      0.028732395 = sum of:
        0.028732395 = product of:
          0.08619718 = sum of:
            0.08619718 = weight(_text_:themes in 653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08619718 = score(doc=653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20225134 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=653)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the nature of, and rationale for, user expectations in the digital library setting, and ways in which they may best be met and/or managed. Design/methodology/approach - An analysis of the literature, focusing on empirical studies, and bringing out main themes and issues. Findings - User expectations of digital libraries are often unrealistic, usually unrealistically high, mainly due to the ubiquity of the web search engine as an information environment. Expectations differ between user groups. Both meeting and managing expectations have been promoted as a solution; it is likely that a mix of the two will be most effective. More empirical and conceptual studies are needed. Ways of making the nature of digital library collections and their organisation "visible", embedded in a natural way within their interfaces, are desirable. Originality/value - This is the first paper to review the literature of this topic.
  18. Obermeier, F.: Schlagwortsuche in einem lokalen OPAC am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Eichstätt : Benutzerforschung anhand von OPAC-Protokolldaten (1999) 0.00
    0.0044174236 = product of:
      0.022087118 = sum of:
        0.022087118 = product of:
          0.06626135 = sum of:
            0.06626135 = weight(_text_:f in 6568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06626135 = score(doc=6568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12538917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 6568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6568)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  19. Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004) 0.00
    0.003830986 = product of:
      0.01915493 = sum of:
        0.01915493 = product of:
          0.05746479 = sum of:
            0.05746479 = weight(_text_:themes in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05746479 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20225134 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The results of a small qualitative study of gay and lesbian information users suggest that facet analysis as it is increasingly practised in the field of information architecture provides a promising avenue for improving information access to gay and lesbian information resources. Findings indicated that gay and lesbian information users have an acute sense of categorization grounded in the need to identify gay-positive physical and social spaces, and in their finely-honed practices of detecting gay "facets" to general information themes. They are also, however, very flexible and adaptable in their application of gay-related facet values, which suggests that browsing systems will have to be designed with considerable care.
  20. Kolmayer, E.: Bases de données grand public et organisation des connaissances (1992) 0.00
    0.0036811866 = product of:
      0.018405933 = sum of:
        0.018405933 = product of:
          0.055217795 = sum of:
            0.055217795 = weight(_text_:f in 6364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055217795 = score(doc=6364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12538917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.031459082 = queryNorm
                0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 6364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6364)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    f

Authors

Languages

  • e 53
  • d 22
  • f 4
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 73
  • m 4
  • x 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…