Search (64 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  1. Drabenstott, K.M.; Simcox, S.; Fenton, E.G.: Do patrons understand Library of Congress Subject Headings? (1999) 0.03
    0.02980162 = product of:
      0.1490081 = sum of:
        0.1490081 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6072) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1490081 = score(doc=6072,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6072, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6072)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  2. Drabenstott, K.M.: Interpreting the findings of "A study of library users and their understanding of subject headings" (1999) 0.03
    0.02980162 = product of:
      0.1490081 = sum of:
        0.1490081 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1490081 = score(doc=6178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6178)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  3. Warner, A.J.: ¬A reaction to the findings of "A study of library users and their understanding of subject headings" (1999) 0.03
    0.02980162 = product of:
      0.1490081 = sum of:
        0.1490081 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 6794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1490081 = score(doc=6794,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.8061172 = fieldWeight in 6794, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6794)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen für präkombinierte Einträge
  4. Klugman, S.: Failures in subject retrieval (1989) 0.02
    0.018389909 = product of:
      0.09194954 = sum of:
        0.09194954 = product of:
          0.2758486 = sum of:
            0.2758486 = weight(_text_:pr in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2758486 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21780749 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                1.266479 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Binghampton, NY : Haworth Pr.
  5. Fussler, H.H.; Siman, J.L.: Patterns in the use of books in large research libraries (1969) 0.02
    0.018389909 = product of:
      0.09194954 = sum of:
        0.09194954 = product of:
          0.2758486 = sum of:
            0.2758486 = weight(_text_:pr in 4490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2758486 = score(doc=4490,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21780749 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                1.266479 = fieldWeight in 4490, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4490)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Chicago : Univ. of Chicago Pr.
  6. Zimmerman, N.: User study: implementation of OCLC FAST subject headings in the Lafayette digital repository (2023) 0.02
    0.01738428 = product of:
      0.086921394 = sum of:
        0.086921394 = weight(_text_:doksprachen in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.086921394 = score(doc=1176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1848467 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030401835 = queryNorm
            0.47023502 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0801163 = idf(docFreq=274, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Carlyle, A.: Matching LSCH and user vocabulary in the library catalog (1989) 0.01
    0.013792432 = product of:
      0.06896216 = sum of:
        0.06896216 = product of:
          0.20688646 = sum of:
            0.20688646 = weight(_text_:pr in 347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20688646 = score(doc=347,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21780749 = queryWeight, product of:
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.94985926 = fieldWeight in 347, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  7.1642876 = idf(docFreq=92, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=347)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Binghampton, NY : Haworth Pr.
  8. Byström, K.: Information seekers in context : an analysis of the 'doer' in INSU studies (1999) 0.01
    0.01131511 = product of:
      0.028287776 = sum of:
        0.023138989 = product of:
          0.06941696 = sum of:
            0.06941696 = weight(_text_:themes in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941696 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005148786 = product of:
          0.020595144 = sum of:
            0.020595144 = weight(_text_:22 in 297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020595144 = score(doc=297,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 297, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=297)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In information needs, seeking and use (INSU) research, individuals have most commonly been perceived as users (e.g., Kuhlthau, 1991; Dervin & Nilan, 1986; Dervin, 1989; Belkin, 1980). The concept user originates from the user of libraries and other information services and information systems. Over the years the scope of the concept has become wider and it is nowadays often understood in the sense of seekers of information (e.g., Wilson, 1981; Marchionini, 1995) and users of information (e.g., Streatfield, 1983). Nevertheless, the concept has remained ambiguous by being on the one hand universal and on the other hand extremely specific. The purpose of this paper is to map and evaluate views on people whose information behaviour has been in one way or another the core of our research area. The goal is to shed some light on various relationships between the different aspects of doers in INSU studies. The paper is inspired by Dervin's (1997) analysis of context where she identified among other themes the nature of subject by contrasting a `transcendental individual' with a `decentered subject', and Talja's (1997) presentation about constituting `information' and `user' from the discourse analytic viewpoint as opposed to the cognitive viewpoint. Instead of the metatheoretical approach applied by Dervin and Talja, a more concrete approach is valid in the present analysis where no direct arguments for or against the underlying metatheories are itemised. The focus is on doers in INSU studies leaving other, even closely-related concepts (i.e., information, information seeking, knowledge etc.), outside the scope of the paper.
    Date
    22. 3.2002 9:55:52
  9. Beaudoin, J.E.: Content-based image retrieval methods and professional image users (2016) 0.01
    0.01131511 = product of:
      0.028287776 = sum of:
        0.023138989 = product of:
          0.06941696 = sum of:
            0.06941696 = weight(_text_:themes in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06941696 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005148786 = product of:
          0.020595144 = sum of:
            0.020595144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020595144 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports the findings of a qualitative research study that examined professional image users' knowledge of, and interest in using, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems in an attempt to clarify when and where CBIR methods might be applied. The research sought to determine the differences in the perceived usefulness of CBIR technologies among image user groups from several domains and explicate the reasons given regarding the utility of CBIR systems for their professional tasks. Twenty participants (archaeologists, architects, art historians, and artists), individuals who rely on images of cultural materials in the performance of their work, took part in the study. The findings of the study reveal that interest in CBIR methods varied among the different professional user communities. Individuals who showed an interest in these systems were primarily those concerned with the formal characteristics (i.e., color, shape, composition, and texture) of the images being sought. In contrast, those participants who expressed a strong interest in images of known items, images illustrating themes, and/or items from specific locations believe concept-based searches to be the most direct route. These image users did not see a practical application for CBIR systems in their current work routines.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 12:32:25
  10. Monchaux, S.; Amadieu, F.; Chevalier, A.; Mariné, C.: Query strategies during information searching : effects of prior domain knowledge and complexity of the information problems to be solved (2015) 0.01
    0.0056169867 = product of:
      0.014042467 = sum of:
        0.008893681 = product of:
          0.026681041 = sum of:
            0.026681041 = weight(_text_:f in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026681041 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.005148786 = product of:
          0.020595144 = sum of:
            0.020595144 = weight(_text_:22 in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020595144 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:46:22
  11. Zeitlyn, D.; Bex, J.; David, M.: Making sense of online information (1997) 0.01
    0.0055533573 = product of:
      0.027766787 = sum of:
        0.027766787 = product of:
          0.08330036 = sum of:
            0.08330036 = weight(_text_:themes in 1098) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08330036 = score(doc=1098,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 1098, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1098)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Presents some results from research into the uses and usefulness of electronic bibliographic databases in academic contexts, carried out as part of a British Library funded research project. Ethnographic and focus group data was gathered initially in 3 departments (natural science, social science and humanities) at the University of Kent at Canterbury covering all academic staff, researchers and postgraduates. This was then expanded to postgraduates and staff in the same 3 disciplines at other universities. 5 themes from this research are outlined: who uses the system, who does not, and where are these activities and inactivities happening; where does formal training occur; and where does learning occur. The problems of interface between computer systems and users often mirrored that between library enquiry staff and users where users did not know to frame questions and the advice given was not in a form understood by the users
  12. Bawden, D.; Vilar, P.: Digital libraries : to meet or manage user expectations (2006) 0.01
    0.0055533573 = product of:
      0.027766787 = sum of:
        0.027766787 = product of:
          0.08330036 = sum of:
            0.08330036 = weight(_text_:themes in 653) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08330036 = score(doc=653,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.42618844 = fieldWeight in 653, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=653)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to review the nature of, and rationale for, user expectations in the digital library setting, and ways in which they may best be met and/or managed. Design/methodology/approach - An analysis of the literature, focusing on empirical studies, and bringing out main themes and issues. Findings - User expectations of digital libraries are often unrealistic, usually unrealistically high, mainly due to the ubiquity of the web search engine as an information environment. Expectations differ between user groups. Both meeting and managing expectations have been promoted as a solution; it is likely that a mix of the two will be most effective. More empirical and conceptual studies are needed. Ways of making the nature of digital library collections and their organisation "visible", embedded in a natural way within their interfaces, are desirable. Originality/value - This is the first paper to review the literature of this topic.
  13. Obermeier, F.: Schlagwortsuche in einem lokalen OPAC am Beispiel der Universitätsbibliothek Eichstätt : Benutzerforschung anhand von OPAC-Protokolldaten (1999) 0.00
    0.0042689666 = product of:
      0.021344833 = sum of:
        0.021344833 = product of:
          0.0640345 = sum of:
            0.0640345 = weight(_text_:f in 6568) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0640345 = score(doc=6568,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.52844554 = fieldWeight in 6568, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6568)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  14. Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004) 0.00
    0.0037022382 = product of:
      0.018511191 = sum of:
        0.018511191 = product of:
          0.05553357 = sum of:
            0.05553357 = weight(_text_:themes in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05553357 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19545428 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.28412563 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The results of a small qualitative study of gay and lesbian information users suggest that facet analysis as it is increasingly practised in the field of information architecture provides a promising avenue for improving information access to gay and lesbian information resources. Findings indicated that gay and lesbian information users have an acute sense of categorization grounded in the need to identify gay-positive physical and social spaces, and in their finely-honed practices of detecting gay "facets" to general information themes. They are also, however, very flexible and adaptable in their application of gay-related facet values, which suggests that browsing systems will have to be designed with considerable care.
  15. Kolmayer, E.: Bases de données grand public et organisation des connaissances (1992) 0.00
    0.0035574723 = product of:
      0.017787362 = sum of:
        0.017787362 = product of:
          0.053362083 = sum of:
            0.053362083 = weight(_text_:f in 6364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053362083 = score(doc=6364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.4403713 = fieldWeight in 6364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6364)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    f
  16. Scholle, U.: Kann ich Ihnen behilflich sein? : Erhebung am zentralen Auskunftsplatz der ULB Münster (2000) 0.00
    0.0028833204 = product of:
      0.0144166015 = sum of:
        0.0144166015 = product of:
          0.057666406 = sum of:
            0.057666406 = weight(_text_:22 in 7585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057666406 = score(doc=7585,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7585, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7585)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 17:52:11
  17. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.00
    0.0028833204 = product of:
      0.0144166015 = sum of:
        0.0144166015 = product of:
          0.057666406 = sum of:
            0.057666406 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057666406 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10646205 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  18. Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬Les catalogues en ligne juges par les utilisateurs (1991) 0.00
    0.002845978 = product of:
      0.014229889 = sum of:
        0.014229889 = product of:
          0.042689666 = sum of:
            0.042689666 = weight(_text_:f in 6602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042689666 = score(doc=6602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Language
    f
  19. Slack, F.: End user searches and search path maps : a discussion (1996) 0.00
    0.002845978 = product of:
      0.014229889 = sum of:
        0.014229889 = product of:
          0.042689666 = sum of:
            0.042689666 = weight(_text_:f in 4695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042689666 = score(doc=4695,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 4695, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4695)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  20. Slack, F.: End-user searches and search path maps : a discussion (1996) 0.00
    0.002845978 = product of:
      0.014229889 = sum of:
        0.014229889 = product of:
          0.042689666 = sum of:
            0.042689666 = weight(_text_:f in 6731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042689666 = score(doc=6731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12117521 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.030401835 = queryNorm
                0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 6731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6731)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    

Authors

Languages

  • e 52
  • d 6
  • f 4
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 61
  • m 2
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…