Search (83 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Bestandsaufstellung"
  1. Beguet, B.; Hadjopoulou, C.: ¬Les collections en libre access de la Bibliothèque Nationale de France : organisation par departments et usage de la Dewey (1996) 0.05
    0.045486107 = product of:
      0.090972215 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
        0.08579115 = weight(_text_:et in 5732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08579115 = score(doc=5732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.41471857 = fieldWeight in 5732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5732)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Giampietro, R.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part A (2009) 0.03
    0.02533359 = product of:
      0.05066718 = sum of:
        0.007771606 = weight(_text_:a in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007771606 = score(doc=3274,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
        0.042895574 = weight(_text_:et in 3274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042895574 = score(doc=3274,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20686594 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.20735928 = fieldWeight in 3274, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.692005 = idf(docFreq=1101, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3274)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the late seventies, I was asked to work on classifying our Philosophy (and Psychology) collections, which were still located partly in the stacks and partly in the so-called Seminars-a traditional didactic and research structure of our School-where the books were mostly ordered by format or collection title. As often happens, my task was not completely free of restrictions: the general "new policy" of the entire Library was oriented toward accomplishing an open-shelf decimal classification, and the first step was to avoid an overly complicated schema, as this would probably have rendered more difficult the task of the end users, that is, our students but mainly our teaching staff. At the Scuola Normale Superiore, where historicism has always had an illustrious though somewhat cumbersome tradition (I quote only two philosophers and/or historians of Philosophy: Giovanni Gentile and Eugenio Garin), ordering the Philosophy collection- with its divisions, topics, geographical notations, chronological tables et similia-strictly by the Dewey decimal system might have been unthinkable. A second requirement was to designate a main location to the large collection of the often "complete works" of the philosophical Tradition. This way, the ideal Reader, foreseen to linger for hours in the newly restored library building of the Palazzo della Gherardesca, could easily access the reservoir of the great texts, which were to be followed on the shelves by the secondary literature ad auctorem. All in all, the implicit message to our students and scholars was to be the virtuous necessity of finding, ready on the shelves, the substantial core of the textual Tradition.
    Arranged only in alphabetic order without any chronological partition (with the Cutter numbers as additional support), the Authors were meant to constitute (an actually are) the main section of our Philosophy collection. However, there was a further, even more challenging exception: the Greek and Latin Classics had to be "attracted" by the underlying Philology Seminar, where a formidable collection that is constantly enriched by donors and former professors of the Scuola Normale, from Giorgio Pasquali to Arnaldo Momigliano, had to embody the Ancient Philosophy as a tribute to the German traditional unity of the Antike. Therefore, in our library, medieval philosophy is arranged as a new Beginning, perhaps in consolatory and coherent balance with the spectacular structure of the town, which can be admired from the windows of the magnificent building where we are housed, including Count Ugolino's tower!
    Type
    a
  3. Alternative arrangement : new approaches to public library stock (1982) 0.02
    0.024125762 = product of:
      0.048251525 = sum of:
        0.007327141 = weight(_text_:a in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007327141 = score(doc=1774,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
        0.040924385 = product of:
          0.08184877 = sum of:
            0.08184877 = weight(_text_:al in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08184877 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.4050777 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ASTIN, J.: Cheshire: Alternative arrangement and beyond; READER, D.: User orientation in a Hertfordshire branch; CHANDLER, D.: Self-service-libraries: providing for the smaller community in Cambridgeshire; BETTS, D.: Reader interest categories in Surrey; DONBROSKI, L.: Categorisation at East Sussex County Library; McCARTHY, A.: Burning issues: stock appeal in Sunderland; MORSON, I. u. M. PERRY: Two-tier and total: stock arrangement in Brent
    Signature
    Al 12b Arr
  4. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf classification research : past, present, future? (1980) 0.02
    0.01790442 = product of:
      0.07161768 = sum of:
        0.07161768 = product of:
          0.14323536 = sum of:
            0.14323536 = weight(_text_:al in 3498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14323536 = score(doc=3498,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.70888597 = fieldWeight in 3498, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3498)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Signature
    Al 12b Hym
  5. Stokmans, M.; Oomens, A.: Meer grasduinen door genreplaatsing? : genre- of alfabetische plaatsing: onderzoek naar verschillen in gebruikersgedrag (1997) 0.02
    0.016450718 = product of:
      0.032901436 = sum of:
        0.011994347 = weight(_text_:a in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011994347 = score(doc=883,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=883,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As part of her doctoral dissertation at Brabant Catholic University in the Netherlands A. Oomens recently held a survey to determine the relative merits of author and subject arrangements for non fiction collections. Although users browsing through the collections were more likely to find material of interest via a subject arrangement, those looking for a particular title were best served by an author arrangement. All users interviewed preferred the arrangement with which they were familiar
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Subject arrangement assists browsing?: subject versus alphabetical arrangement: a study in differences in user behavious
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 1(1997) no.21, S.22-23
    Type
    a
  6. Tiggelen, N. van: ¬Een landelijk systeem zou ideaal zijn : bibliotheken van Leerdam en Weert experimenteren met alternatieve plaatsing (1998) 0.02
    0.016433848 = product of:
      0.032867696 = sum of:
        0.008973878 = weight(_text_:a in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008973878 = score(doc=4494,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
        0.023893818 = product of:
          0.047787637 = sum of:
            0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047787637 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Dissatisfied with the national public library classification SISO some public libraries experiment with a own, more user friendly system
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: A national system urgently required: Leerdam and Weert public libraries experiment with alternative shelf location systems
    Source
    BibliotheekBlad. 2(1998) no.10/11, S.22-24
    Type
    a
  7. Rotten, C. v.d.: oderzoek naar alternatieve plaatsing : Bijna net zoveel systemen als bibliotheken (1995) 0.02
    0.015522082 = product of:
      0.031044165 = sum of:
        0.010137074 = weight(_text_:a in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010137074 = score(doc=4660,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 4660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=4660,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4660, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last 10 years a number of libraries in the Netherlands have developed akternative shelf arrangements to the standard SISO system. A survey undertaken at Felde children's library following the implementation of an alternative arrangement showed that children had been unaware of the change. In 1989 the Nederlands Bibliothekk en Lektuur Centrum (Dutch Centre for Libraries and Reading) began developing a system based on trials at 15 libraries. Further implementations of the system should take account of developments with automated catalogues
    Footnote
    Übers. des Titels: Almost as many systems as libraries: a study of alternative shelf arrangement schems
    Source
    Bibliotheek en samenleving. 23(1995) no.11, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  8. Hyman, R.J.: Shelf access in libraries (1982) 0.02
    0.015346645 = product of:
      0.06138658 = sum of:
        0.06138658 = product of:
          0.12277316 = sum of:
            0.12277316 = weight(_text_:al in 3391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12277316 = score(doc=3391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205697 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.60761654 = fieldWeight in 3391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.582931 = idf(docFreq=1228, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3391)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Signature
    Al 12b Hym
  9. Schössow, T.; Christoffersen, A.; Norlem, E.; Christensen, S.: Art in the children's library (1992) 0.01
    0.014986983 = product of:
      0.029973965 = sum of:
        0.009066874 = weight(_text_:a in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009066874 = score(doc=913,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 913) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=913,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 913, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=913)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a project designed to integrate art into the children's library at Espergaerde in Denmark. Explains the aims of the project, principally to make the use of the library an artistic experience, and the 3 tasks the project was to fulfil: the redesign of the interior using artwork by local artists; a change from the traditional arrangement of fiction; and provision of workshop facilities for children to exercise their artistic inclinations. Details how these tasks were accopmplished and discusses the results of the project, stressing the renewed appreciation of art and the importance of passing that on to children
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.1, S.20-22
    Type
    a
  10. Saarti, J.: Experiments with categorising fiction in Lohtajy Library (1992) 0.01
    0.014537444 = product of:
      0.029074889 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
        0.023893818 = product of:
          0.047787637 = sum of:
            0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047787637 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Scandinavian public library quarterly. 25(1992) no.4, S.22-24,29
    Type
    a
  11. Whelan, J.A.: Public access compact shelving in an academic branch library (1996) 0.01
    0.014537444 = product of:
      0.029074889 = sum of:
        0.0051810704 = weight(_text_:a in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0051810704 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
        0.023893818 = product of:
          0.047787637 = sum of:
            0.047787637 = weight(_text_:22 in 344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047787637 = score(doc=344,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 344, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-32
    Type
    a
  12. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.01
    0.013719298 = product of:
      0.027438596 = sum of:
        0.009518234 = weight(_text_:a in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009518234 = score(doc=1858,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.017920362 = product of:
          0.035840724 = sum of:
            0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035840724 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
    Type
    a
  13. Shorten, J.; Seikel, M.; Ahrberg, J.H.: Why do you still use dewey? : Academic libraries that continue with dewey decimal classification (2005) 0.01
    0.0133046415 = product of:
      0.026609283 = sum of:
        0.00868892 = weight(_text_:a in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00868892 = score(doc=125,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.017920362 = product of:
          0.035840724 = sum of:
            0.035840724 = weight(_text_:22 in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035840724 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reclassification was a popular trend during the 1960s and 1970s for many academic libraries wanting to change from Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) to Library of Congress (LC) Classification. In 2002, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale's Morris Library changed from DDC to LC. If one academic library recently converted, might other DDC academic libraries consider switching, too? Conversely, for those academic libraries that remain with DDC, what are the reasons they continue with it? A survey of thirty-four DDC academic libraries in the United States and Canada determined what factors influence these libraries to continue using DDC, and if reclassification is something they have considered or are considering. The survey also investigated whether patrons of these DDC libraries prefer LC and if their preference influences the library's decision to reclassify. Results from the survey indicate that the issue of reclassification is being considered by some of these libraries even though, overall, they are satisfied with DDC. The study was unable to determine if patrons' preference for a classification scheme influenced a library's decision to reclassify.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    Type
    a
  14. Lowisch, M.: Gesamthochschulbibliotheken und Klassifikationsentwicklung im Spannungsfeld zwischen Kooperation und lokalen Bedürfnissen (2017) 0.01
    0.0127202645 = product of:
      0.025440529 = sum of:
        0.004533437 = weight(_text_:a in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004533437 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
        0.020907091 = product of:
          0.041814182 = sum of:
            0.041814182 = weight(_text_:22 in 5116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041814182 = score(doc=5116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2019 16:22:59
    Type
    a
  15. Müller-Dreier, A.: Einheitsklassifikation : die Geschichte einer fortwirkenden Idee (1994) 0.01
    0.009085903 = product of:
      0.018171806 = sum of:
        0.003238169 = weight(_text_:a in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.003238169 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.06369744 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
        0.014933636 = product of:
          0.029867273 = sum of:
            0.029867273 = weight(_text_:22 in 2052) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029867273 = score(doc=2052,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2052, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2052)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungsblatt VdB NW N.F. 45(1995) H.3, S.332-333 (H. Lohse) [Auch wenn H. Lohse meint, das Buch bzw. die zugrundeliegende Assessorarbeit hätte nicht geschrieben werden müssen, so liefert doch gerade seine Rezension den Beweis, wie notwendig diese Arbeit war]; BuB 47(1995) H.10, S.955-959 (I. Nöther) ["Diese von einem Berufsanfänger vorgelegte Arbeit ist eine Spitzenleistung, ein Meisterwerk, auf das der Autor, seine Ausbildungsstätte sowie der Verlag und der Herausgeber der Reihe sotz sein können. Für jeden, der sich heute und in Zukunft mit Fragen der Klassifikation befaßt, ist die Lektüre dieses Buches Pflicht"]; Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis 20(1996) H.1, S.134-135 (W. Gödert); Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.178 (B. Lorenz); Journal of documentation 51(1995) no.4, S.434-437 (J.S. Andrews)
  16. Bonse, C.; Fischer, N.: So wird die Sucheffizienz gesteigert : Stadtbibliothek Siegburg stellt nach Kundenbefragung den Bestand fast komplett um (2008) 0.01
    0.0063601322 = product of:
      0.0127202645 = sum of:
        0.0022667185 = weight(_text_:a in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0022667185 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.044588212 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
        0.0104535455 = product of:
          0.020907091 = sum of:
            0.020907091 = weight(_text_:22 in 1827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020907091 = score(doc=1827,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15439226 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044089027 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 1827, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    11. 5.2008 15:11:22
    Type
    a
  17. Orvig, M.: ¬The reader interest arrangement : an american shelving system with a future (1955) 0.00
    0.0036635704 = product of:
      0.014654282 = sum of:
        0.014654282 = weight(_text_:a in 5263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014654282 = score(doc=5263,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 5263, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5263)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Type
    a
  18. Thornton, G.A.: Physical access to periodical literature : the dilemma revisited and a brief look at the future (1991) 0.00
    0.0034269562 = product of:
      0.013707825 = sum of:
        0.013707825 = weight(_text_:a in 2851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013707825 = score(doc=2851,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 2851, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2851)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The debate over how periodical collections are best organised has simmered since the 1940s. Describes Univ. of North Texas Libraries' review of its alphabetically arranged periodical collections and a proposal to classify them. A literature search revealed little information concerning implications or cost of a classification project and few alternate solutions. The topic was developed into a 1990 NASIG workshop, with a participant survey concerning serials organisation. Briefly looks at current developments for improving access to periodical literature
    Type
    a
  19. Losee, R.M.: ¬The relative shelf location of circulated books : a study of classification, users, and browsing (1993) 0.00
    0.0029985867 = product of:
      0.011994347 = sum of:
        0.011994347 = weight(_text_:a in 4485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011994347 = score(doc=4485,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 4485, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4485)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Patrons often browse through books organized by a library classification system, looking for books to use and possibly circulate. This research is an examination of the clustering of similar books provided by a classification system and ways in which the books that patrons circulate are clustered. Measures of classification system performance are suggested and used to evaluate two test collections. Regression formulas are derived describing the relationships among the number of areas in which books were found (the number of stops a patron makes when browsing), the distances across a cluster, and the average number of books a patron circulates. Patrons were found usually to make more stops than there were books found at their average stop. Consequences for full-text document systems and online catalogs are suggested
    Type
    a
  20. Dean, B.C.: Reclassification in an automated environment (1984) 0.00
    0.0029143523 = product of:
      0.011657409 = sum of:
        0.011657409 = weight(_text_:a in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011657409 = score(doc=340,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.05083672 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044089027 = queryNorm
            0.22931081 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    For a variety of reasons, reclassification was a popular project in libraries in the 1960s. Although such projects have faded from the limelight, some of the reasons for doing them remain valid today, i.e., a need to cut processing costs, participation in cooperative ventures, the inconvenience caused by working with a collection split between two classification systems, and continuing changes in the Dewey schedules. This article compares the steps needed for reclassifying in a manual environment with those required when the library has an in-house computer system. The comparison shows how using the latter makes a reclassification project more feasible than it would be in a totally manual library. The article also discusses various issues associated with reclassification in an automated environment such as the problem posed by a frozen public catalog and the combining of reclassification and conversion projects.
    Type
    a

Languages

  • e 42
  • d 36
  • nl 4
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 78
  • m 3
  • b 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…