Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01 
    0.009196093 = product of:
  0.055176556 = sum of:
    0.0036860886 = weight(_text_:information in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0036860886 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
    0.051490467 = weight(_text_:kongress in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051490467 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20294477 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.25371665 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Issue
    Bericht vom PATLIB-Kongress des Europäischen Patentamts vom 17. bis 19. Mai 2005 in Sinaia, Rumänien.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 56(2005) H.7, S.365-370
  2. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.01 
    0.0072403327 = product of:
  0.043441996 = sum of:
    0.010944845 = weight(_text_:information in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010944845 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
    0.03249715 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03249715 = score(doc=3860,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  3. Schoonbaert, D.: Personal bibliographic systems (2002) 0.01 
    0.00557361 = product of:
  0.03344166 = sum of:
    0.008425346 = weight(_text_:information in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008425346 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
    0.025016313 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025016313 = score(doc=4247,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4247, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4247)
  0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    Abstract
    This discussion of Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) features deals with microcomputer programs that manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. Although various partially overlapping terminologies may be encountered in the literature such programs as EndNote, ProCite, and Reference Manager-three of the most popular PBS-have by now become household names in academic circles. Several dozens of similar programs exist, each with its own peculiar combination of desirable and less appropriate features. The names of over 100 PBS examples are listed in Appendix 2.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.70, [=Suppl.33]
  4. dwi: Zitatenschatz (2003) 0.00 
    0.0028801528 = product of:
  0.03456183 = sum of:
    0.03456183 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03456183 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1269905 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Content
    "Während der Anwender ein Manuskript bearbeitet, fügt er Zitate direkt in den Text ein. Bibliographix arbeitet dabei eng mit Word zusammen. Wer eine andere Textverarbeitung verwendet, muss zum Einfügen den Umweg über die Zwischenablage wählen. Im Text erscheinen zunächst temporäre Zitate. In der fertigen Fassung wandelt Bibliographix die Platzhalter in die endgültige Form um und erstellt einen Anhang aller zitierten Werke. Bibliographix bietet jetzt einen direkten Zugang zur Deutschen Bibliothek, zum Hessischen Verbundkatalog, dem Gemeinsamen Verbundkatalog norddeutscher Bibliotheken sowie dem schweizerischen Helveticat. Auch Anfragen in den USA (Medline sowie Library of Congress) sind möglich. Quellenangaben aus dem Bibliothekskatalog wandern per Mausklick in die eigene Datenbank. Dank sinnvoller Ergänzungen ist das Programm komfortabler geworden, aber nach wie vor intuitiv zu bedienen. Die Basisversion ist zwar auf zehn Bibliothekszugriffe beschränkt, für kleinere Arbeiten reicht diese kostenlose Variante aber aus."
  5. dwi: Quellenarchiv (2002) 0.00 
    0.0024001272 = product of:
  0.028801527 = sum of:
    0.028801527 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028801527 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1269905 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.22680065 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Content
    "Für bibliografische Angaben wie Autor, Titel und Erscheinungsjahr ist der obere Teil der Eingabemaske vorgesehen. Der Mittelteil hilft bei Beschaffung und Archi-vierung der Materialien: Ein Häkchen zeigt, ob eine Veröffentlichung noch fehlt oder schon abgelegt wurde. Angaben dazu, unter welcher Signatur und in welcher Bibliothek das Werk verfügbar ist, finden hier ebenso Platz wie Verweise auf das heimische Ablagesystem. Die Stichwort-Zuordnung erleichtert später das Suchen nach Material zu einem bestimmten Teilgebiet. In das Feld für die Zusammenfassung passen bis zu 4000 Zeichen; sinnvoll sind hier eine Inhaltsangabe oder einige kurze Zitate. Mit dem Literaturmanager kann man zwar beliebig viele Datenbanken aufbauen, allerdings immer nur eine zur selben Zeit öffnen. Der Export der Daten ist nur in eine Textdatei möglich, dabei kann man das Format mit einem kleinen Editor festlegen. Zum Import geeignet sind Datensätze aus Standard-Datenbanken, außerdem versteht Liman Excel- und Txt-Dateien. Hersteller infoball hofft vor allem auf Anwender, die das Web-Portal infoball.de zur Literaturrecherche benutzen. Der Import dieses Recherche-Ergebnisses in die Liman-Datenbank ist dabei für Inhaber eines kostenpflichtigen Accounts besonders einfach, möglich ist er aber bereits nach einer kostenlosen Registrierung. Insgesamt ist Liman 2.7 ein unkompliziertes Einsteigerprogramm, das auch für Studenten erschwinglich ist (? 50)."
  6. Hobohm, H.-C.: Jedem seine Datenbank! : Bibliographie-Software im Vergleich: EndNote, ProCite und Reference Manager (2000) 0.00 
    0.0010531682 = product of:
  0.0126380185 = sum of:
    0.0126380185 = weight(_text_:information in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0126380185 = score(doc=5434,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 51(2000) H.7, S.431-434
  7. Hussain, K.H.; Rajeev, J.S.: ¬The changing language technology and CDS/ ISIS : UNICODE and the emergence of OTF (2006) 0.00 
    7.6005876E-4 = product of:
  0.009120705 = sum of:
    0.009120705 = weight(_text_:information in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009120705 = score(doc=1496,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    Language technology is undergoing a great change and within a few years languages of the world will embark on OTF (Open Type Font) Technology. Major operating systems have already started embedding Asian languages using OTF. Being a major bibliographic DBMS, CDS/ISIS cannot ignore these developments that have taken place in text processing. This paper looks at the ideas behind Unicode and OTF and examines future developments of multilingual information systems. The Unicode is a minimalist encoding which includes currently all major scripts in use and allows easy migration from an existing encoding scheme to it. Indic language computing will be tremendously benefited from the development of OTF in compliance with Unicode. CDS/ISIS should be made Unicode compliant by utilizing the shaping and encoding engine on various operating systems so that it can be effectively utilized to develop and distribute local information systems using vernacular scripts. The source code of CDS/ISIS may be made available under a free software license, allowing the evolution of the package in a free and socially useful manner.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad
  8. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.00 
    6.205853E-4 = product of:
  0.0074470234 = sum of:
    0.0074470234 = weight(_text_:information in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0074470234 = score(doc=1495,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03093157 = queryNorm
        0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
  0.083333336 = coord(1/12)
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
    Source
    Knowledge organization, information systems and other essays: Professor A. Neelameghan Festschrift. Ed. by K.S. Raghavan and K.N. Prasad

Authors

Languages