Search (19 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.022620002 = product of:
  0.11310001 = sum of:
    0.11310001 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11310001 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.019993445 = product of:
  0.09996723 = sum of:
    0.09996723 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09996723 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.011996068 = product of:
  0.05998034 = sum of:
    0.05998034 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05998034 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  4. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  5. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  6. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.0084825 = product of:
  0.0424125 = sum of:
    0.0424125 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0424125 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  7. Neuhaus, C.; Daniel, H.-D.: Data sources for performing citation analysis : an overview (2008) 0.01 
    0.007745042 = product of:
  0.03872521 = sum of:
    0.03872521 = weight(_text_:21 in 1735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03872521 = score(doc=1735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.23959327 = fieldWeight in 1735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1735)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 3.2008 14:24:49
  8. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.0070687504 = product of:
  0.03534375 = sum of:
    0.03534375 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03534375 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  9. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.01 
    0.0066386065 = product of:
  0.033193033 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
  10. Gorraiz, J.; Schlögl, C.: Zusammenhang von Zeitschriftennachfrage und -zitationshäufigkeiten : ¬Eine bibliometrische Analyse eines Dokumentlieferdienstes am Beispiel von Subito (2003) 0.01 
    0.0066386065 = product of:
  0.033193033 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=718,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 718, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=718)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    17.12.1996 21:11:09
  11. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.01 
    0.0066386065 = product of:
  0.033193033 = sum of:
    0.033193033 = weight(_text_:21 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033193033 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.20536566 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 7.2006 10:52:41
  12. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.0056550005 = product of:
  0.028275002 = sum of:
    0.028275002 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028275002 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1827017 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  13. Stock, W.G.: Journal Citation Reports : Ein Impact Factor für Bibliotheken, Verlage und Autoren? (2001) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    25. 5.2001 21:02:36
  14. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.21-30
  15. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=5220,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 7.2006 11:02:44
  16. Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
  17. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 3.2008 14:00:54
  18. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.01 
    0.0055321725 = product of:
  0.027660862 = sum of:
    0.027660862 = weight(_text_:21 in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027660862 = score(doc=1960,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.17113805 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    12. 7.2008 17:57:21
  19. Haridasan, S.; Kulshrestha, V.K.: Citation analysis of scholarly communication in the journal Knowledge Organization (2007) 0.00 
    0.004425738 = product of:
  0.02212869 = sum of:
    0.02212869 = weight(_text_:21 in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02212869 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.16162895 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.052173212 = queryNorm
        0.13691044 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.0979297 = idf(docFreq=5425, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Citation analysis is one of the popular methods employed for identification of core documents and complex relationship between citing and cited documents for a particular scholarly community in a geographical proximity. The present citation study is to understand the information needs, use pattern and use behaviour of library and information science researchers particularly engaged in the field of knowledge organization. Design/methodology/approach - The data relating to all the references appended to the articles during the period under study were collected and tabulated. Findings - Citation analysis of the journal for the period under study reveals that the average number of citations is around 21 per article. The major source of information is books and documents published during the later half of the century (1982-91). Authors from the USA, UK and Germany are the major contributors to the journal. India is ranked seventh in terms of contributions. Research limitations/implications - The study undertaken is limited to nine years, i.e. 1993-2001. The model citation index of the journal is analyzed using the first seven core authors. Practical implications - Ranking of periodicals helps to identify the core periodicals cited in the journal Knowledge Organization. Ranking of authors is done to know the eminent personalities in the subject, whose work is used by the authors to refine their ideas on the subject or topic. Originality/value - Model Citation Index for the first seven most cited authors was worked out and it reveals the historical relationship of cited and citing documents. This model citation index can be used to identify, the most cited authors as researchers currently working on special problems, to determine whether a paper has been cited, whether there has been a review of a subject, whether a concept has been applied, a theory confirmed or a method improved.

Authors

Languages

  • e 14
  • d 5

Themes