Search (24 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Umstätter, W.: Szientometrische Verfahren (2004) 0.01 
    0.012944549 = product of:
  0.051778197 = sum of:
    0.051778197 = weight(_text_:lernen in 2920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051778197 = score(doc=2920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20909165 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.6033173 = idf(docFreq=442, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03731569 = queryNorm
        0.24763398 = fieldWeight in 2920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.6033173 = idf(docFreq=442, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2920)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der Messbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Leistungen anhand bibliothekarisch nachweisbarer Publikationsergebnisse. Bei genauer Betrachtung ist es ihr Ziel, die Wissenszunahme der Wissenschaft zu messen. Die wissenschaftliche Produktion in Form von Publikationen wächst seit über dreihundert Jahren konstant mit ca. 3,5% pro Jahr. Das entspricht einerVerdopplungsrate von 20 Jahren, die zuerst dem Bibliothekar Fremont Rider 1948 bei Büchern auffiel und die 1963 von Derek J. de Solla Price auch für das Wachstum von Zeitschriften und Bibliografien bestätigt wurde. Die Konstanz dieser Evolution, unabhängig aller sich ereignenden Katastrophen, ist nur zum Teil verstanden, macht aber den unaufhaltsamen Fortschritt der Wissenschaft deutlich. Alle 20 Jahre wird so viel publiziert wie in allen Jahrhunderten davor. Eine etwa gleiche Zunahme verzeichnen die Wissenschaftler, die damit etwa gleich produktiv bleiben. Von ihnen allen sind damit ca. 87% unsere heutigen Zeitgenossen. Aus diesem Wachstum heraus können wir abschätzen, dass in 100.000 laufenden Zeitschriften heute etwa 10 Mio. Publikationen jährlich erscheinen, die von 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern verfasst werden. Dabei definieren sich nur die als Wissenschaftler, die durchschnittlich eine Publikation jährlich verfassen. Die gesamte Produktion an Buchtiteln, die bisher erschien, dürfte bei etwa 100 Mio. liegen. Davon sind etwa 20 Mio. als wissenschaftlich einzustufen. Wenn folglich 87% aller Wissenschaftler noch heute leben, so betrug die Gesamtzahl der Wissenschaftler in der Welt bisher 11,5 Mio., die in ihrem Leben durchschnittlich 1,5 Bücher pro Kopf verfassten, und etwa das 10-20fache an Zeitschriftenbeiträgen leisteten. Ein Teil dieser Bücher sind allerdings Neuauflagen und Übersetzungen. Nach Lotka, A. J. ist die Produktivität der Wissenschaftler eine schiefe Verteilung von der Form A/n**2, wobei A die Zahl der Autoren mit nur einer Publikation ist und n die Publikationen pro Autor. Während Price in seinen "Networks of Scientific Papers" Vergleichswerte von n**2,5 bis n**3 angab, zeigten Untersuchungen am Science Citation Index (SCI), die auf die gesamte naturwissenschaftliche Literatur hochgerechnet wurden, eher einen Wert von n**1,7. Auf die Tatsache, dass eine Verdopplungsrate der Wissenschaftler von 20 Jahren und eine solche der Menschheit von etwa 50 Jahren dazu führt, dass eines Tages alle Menschen Wissenschaftler werden, hat Price bereits 1963 hingewiesen. Dieser Zustand müsste bei 10 Mio. Wissenschaftlern und 6 Mrd. Menschen in etwa 300 Jahren eintreten, ein nur scheinbar absurder Gedanke, wenn man bedenkt, dass man sich vor 300 Jahren auch kaum vorstellen konnte, dass alle Menschen Lesen, Schreiben und Rechnen lernen können, und dass wir uns ungebildete Menschen immer weniger leisten können.
  2. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01 
    0.012440606 = product of:
  0.049762424 = sum of:
    0.049762424 = product of:
      0.124406055 = sum of:
        0.0529068 = weight(_text_:28 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0529068 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.07149925 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07149925 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0040446087 = product of:
  0.016178435 = sum of:
    0.016178435 = product of:
      0.08089217 = sum of:
        0.08089217 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08089217 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.002144978 = product of:
  0.008579912 = sum of:
    0.008579912 = product of:
      0.042899556 = sum of:
        0.042899556 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042899556 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  5. Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0020406614 = product of:
  0.008162646 = sum of:
    0.008162646 = product of:
      0.040813226 = sum of:
        0.040813226 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040813226 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:52:23
  6. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00 
    0.0020406614 = product of:
  0.008162646 = sum of:
    0.008162646 = product of:
      0.040813226 = sum of:
        0.040813226 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040813226 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  7. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.00 
    0.0017855786 = product of:
  0.007142314 = sum of:
    0.007142314 = product of:
      0.03571157 = sum of:
        0.03571157 = weight(_text_:29 in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03571157 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:51:59
  8. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.00 
    0.0015872039 = product of:
  0.0063488157 = sum of:
    0.0063488157 = product of:
      0.031744078 = sum of:
        0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031744078 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
  9. Aguillo, I.F.; Granadino, B.; Ortega, J.L.; Prieto, J.A.: Scientific research activity and communication measured with cybermetrics indicators (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015872039 = product of:
  0.0063488157 = sum of:
    0.0063488157 = product of:
      0.031744078 = sum of:
        0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 5898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031744078 = score(doc=5898,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 5898, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5898)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 8.2006 12:28:13
  10. Chen, C.; Paul, R.J.; O'Keefe, B.: Fitting the Jigsaw of citation : information visualization in domain analysis (2001) 0.00 
    0.001530496 = product of:
  0.006121984 = sum of:
    0.006121984 = product of:
      0.03060992 = sum of:
        0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 5766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03060992 = score(doc=5766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5766)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:53
  11. Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001) 0.00 
    0.001530496 = product of:
  0.006121984 = sum of:
    0.006121984 = product of:
      0.03060992 = sum of:
        0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03060992 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:09
  12. Frandsen, T.F.; Rousseau, R.: Article impact calculated over arbitrary periods (2005) 0.00 
    0.001530496 = product of:
  0.006121984 = sum of:
    0.006121984 = product of:
      0.03060992 = sum of:
        0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 3264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03060992 = score(doc=3264,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3264, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3264)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 3.2005 10:29:08
  13. Aksnes, D.W.: Citation rates and perceptions of scientific contribution (2006) 0.00 
    0.001530496 = product of:
  0.006121984 = sum of:
    0.006121984 = product of:
      0.03060992 = sum of:
        0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 4925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03060992 = score(doc=4925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4925)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    11. 2.2006 17:52:29
  14. González, L.; Campanario, J.M.: Structure of the impact factor of journals included in the Social Sciences Citation Index : citations from documents labeled "Editorial Material" (2007) 0.00 
    0.001530496 = product of:
  0.006121984 = sum of:
    0.006121984 = product of:
      0.03060992 = sum of:
        0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 75) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03060992 = score(doc=75,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 75, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=75)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 3.2007 18:29:17
  15. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015167282 = product of:
  0.006066913 = sum of:
    0.006066913 = product of:
      0.030334564 = sum of:
        0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030334564 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  16. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015167282 = product of:
  0.006066913 = sum of:
    0.006066913 = product of:
      0.030334564 = sum of:
        0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030334564 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  17. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015167282 = product of:
  0.006066913 = sum of:
    0.006066913 = product of:
      0.030334564 = sum of:
        0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030334564 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  18. Hyland, K.: Self-citation and self-reference : credibility and promotion in academic publication (2003) 0.00 
    0.00132267 = product of:
  0.00529068 = sum of:
    0.00529068 = product of:
      0.0264534 = sum of:
        0.0264534 = weight(_text_:28 in 5156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0264534 = score(doc=5156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5156)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Hyland examines self referencing practices by analyzing their textual uses in 240 randomly chosen research papers and 800 abstracts across 80 expert selected journals from 1997 and 1998 in eight disciplines, as a key to their author's assumptions as to their own role in the research process and to the practices of their disciplines. Scanned texts produced a corpus of nearly 1.5 million words which was searched using WordPilot for first person pronouns and all mentions of an author's previous work. There were 6,689 instances of self reference in the papers and 459 in the abstracts; on the average 28 cases per paper, 17% of which were self citations. There was one self mention in every two abstracts. Nearly 70% of self reference and mention occurred in humanities and social science papers, but biologists employed the most self citation overall and 12% of hard science citations were found to be self citations. Interviews indicated that self citation was deemed important in establishing authority by fitting oneself into the research framework. Self mention arises in four main contexts: stating the goal or the structure of the paper, explaining a procedure, stating results or a claim, and elaborating an argument.
  19. Case, D.O.; Higgins, G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? : A study of reasons for citing literature in communication (2000) 0.00 
    0.0012754134 = product of:
  0.0051016537 = sum of:
    0.0051016537 = product of:
      0.025508268 = sum of:
        0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 4775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025508268 = score(doc=4775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4775)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    19. 5.2000 20:15:29
  20. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.00 
    0.0012754134 = product of:
  0.0051016537 = sum of:
    0.0051016537 = product of:
      0.025508268 = sum of:
        0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025508268 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03731569 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:01:01

Authors

Languages

  • e 21
  • d 3

Themes