-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.03
0.0287656 = product of:
0.0575312 = sum of:
0.0575312 = product of:
0.0862968 = sum of:
0.04928717 = weight(_text_:h in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04928717 = score(doc=590,freq=14.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.435748 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037009623 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Object
- H-Index
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
-
Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980)
0.02
0.024878418 = product of:
0.049756836 = sum of:
0.049756836 = product of:
0.07463525 = sum of:
0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03737765 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037257597 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980)
0.02
0.024878418 = product of:
0.049756836 = sum of:
0.049756836 = product of:
0.07463525 = sum of:
0.03737765 = weight(_text_:m in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03737765 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037257597 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.018546142 = product of:
0.037092283 = sum of:
0.037092283 = product of:
0.05563842 = sum of:
0.018628798 = weight(_text_:h in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018628798 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.16469726 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037009623 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.016448721 = product of:
0.032897443 = sum of:
0.032897443 = product of:
0.09869233 = sum of:
0.09869233 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09869233 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.02
0.015455118 = product of:
0.030910237 = sum of:
0.030910237 = product of:
0.046365354 = sum of:
0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015524 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.030841354 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030841354 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.014538753 = product of:
0.029077506 = sum of:
0.029077506 = product of:
0.087232515 = sum of:
0.087232515 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.087232515 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.01
0.010366008 = product of:
0.020732015 = sum of:
0.020732015 = product of:
0.031098021 = sum of:
0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015574021 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015524 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientists may seek to report a single definable body of research in more than one publication, that is, in repeated reports of the same work or in fractional reports, in order to disseminate their research as widely as possible in the scientific community. Up to now, however, it has not been examined whether this strategy of "multiple publication" in fact leads to greater reception of the research. In the present study, we investigate the influence of number of articles reporting the results of a single study on reception in the scientific community (total citation counts of an article on a single study). Our data set consists of 96 applicants for a research fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (BIF), an international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine. The applicants reported to us all articles that they had published within the framework of their doctoral research projects. On this single project, the applicants had published from 1 to 16 articles (M = 4; Mdn = 3). The results of a regression model with an interaction term show that the practice of multiple publication of research study results does in fact lead to greater reception of the research (higher total citation counts) in the scientific community. However, reception is dependent upon length of article: the longer the article, the more total citation counts increase with the number of articles. Thus, it pays for scientists to practice multiple publication of study results in the form of sizable reports.
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.01
0.010366008 = product of:
0.020732015 = sum of:
0.020732015 = product of:
0.031098021 = sum of:
0.015574021 = weight(_text_:m in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015574021 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.015524 = weight(_text_:h in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015524 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.13724773 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, reference standards and reference multipliers are suggested as a means to compare the citation impact of earlier research publications in physics (from the period of "Little Science" in the early 20th century) with that of contemporary papers (from the period of "Big Science," beginning around 1960). For the development of time-specific reference standards, the authors determined (a) the mean citation rates of papers in selected physics journals as well as (b) the mean citation rates of all papers in physics published in 1900 (Little Science) and in 2000 (Big Science); this was accomplished by relying on the processes of field-specific standardization in bibliometry. For the sake of developing reference multipliers with which the citation impact of earlier papers can be adjusted to the citation impact of contemporary papers, they combined the reference standards calculated for 1900 and 2000 into their ratio. The use of reference multipliers is demonstrated by means of two examples involving the time adjusted h index values for Max Planck and Albert Einstein.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.008723252 = product of:
0.017446505 = sum of:
0.017446505 = product of:
0.052339513 = sum of:
0.052339513 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052339513 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Small, H.; Sweeney, E.: Clustering the Science Citation Index using co-citations (1985)
0.01
0.008279467 = product of:
0.016558934 = sum of:
0.016558934 = product of:
0.0496768 = sum of:
0.0496768 = weight(_text_:h in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0496768 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004)
0.01
0.007318084 = product of:
0.014636168 = sum of:
0.014636168 = product of:
0.043908503 = sum of:
0.043908503 = weight(_text_:h in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043908503 = score(doc=2492,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.3881952 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
-
Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002)
0.01
0.0062096 = product of:
0.0124192 = sum of:
0.0124192 = product of:
0.037257597 = sum of:
0.037257597 = weight(_text_:h in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037257597 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.32939452 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.0061682705 = product of:
0.012336541 = sum of:
0.012336541 = product of:
0.037009623 = sum of:
0.037009623 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037009623 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15942755 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995)
0.01
0.0051746666 = product of:
0.010349333 = sum of:
0.010349333 = product of:
0.031048 = sum of:
0.031048 = weight(_text_:h in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031048 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.27449545 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.00
0.0044958326 = product of:
0.008991665 = sum of:
0.008991665 = product of:
0.026974995 = sum of:
0.026974995 = weight(_text_:m in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026974995 = score(doc=1033,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Persson, O.; Beckmann, M.: Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities (1995)
0.00
0.0041530724 = product of:
0.008306145 = sum of:
0.008306145 = product of:
0.024918433 = sum of:
0.024918433 = weight(_text_:m in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024918433 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.00
0.0041530724 = product of:
0.008306145 = sum of:
0.008306145 = product of:
0.024918433 = sum of:
0.024918433 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024918433 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11329143 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996)
0.00
0.0041397335 = product of:
0.008279467 = sum of:
0.008279467 = product of:
0.0248384 = sum of:
0.0248384 = weight(_text_:h in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0248384 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cogito. 12(1996) H.4, S.35-38
-
Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997)
0.00
0.0041397335 = product of:
0.008279467 = sum of:
0.008279467 = product of:
0.0248384 = sum of:
0.0248384 = weight(_text_:h in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0248384 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11310934 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.04552693 = queryNorm
0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung. 1997, H.2, S.48-53
