-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.04
0.044556074 = product of:
0.06683411 = sum of:
0.019095458 = product of:
0.09547729 = sum of:
0.09547729 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09547729 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.047738645 = product of:
0.09547729 = sum of:
0.09547729 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09547729 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.04
0.039382376 = product of:
0.05907356 = sum of:
0.01687816 = product of:
0.0843908 = sum of:
0.0843908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0843908 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.0421954 = product of:
0.0843908 = sum of:
0.0843908 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0843908 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.02
0.023629425 = product of:
0.035444137 = sum of:
0.010126896 = product of:
0.05063448 = sum of:
0.05063448 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063448 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.02531724 = product of:
0.05063448 = sum of:
0.05063448 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05063448 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002)
0.02
0.018086975 = product of:
0.054260924 = sum of:
0.054260924 = weight(_text_:deutsche in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054260924 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20799294 = queryWeight, product of:
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.26087868 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.7224083 = idf(docFreq=1068, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.016708525 = product of:
0.025062786 = sum of:
0.0071607963 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.01790199 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.016708525 = product of:
0.025062786 = sum of:
0.0071607963 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.01790199 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.016708525 = product of:
0.025062786 = sum of:
0.0071607963 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.01790199 = product of:
0.03580398 = sum of:
0.03580398 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03580398 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.013923772 = product of:
0.020885658 = sum of:
0.0059673307 = product of:
0.029836653 = sum of:
0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029836653 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.014918326 = product of:
0.029836653 = sum of:
0.029836653 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029836653 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.011139018 = product of:
0.016708527 = sum of:
0.0047738645 = product of:
0.023869323 = sum of:
0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023869323 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.011934661 = product of:
0.023869323 = sum of:
0.023869323 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023869323 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15423398 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Stock, W.G.: Journal Citation Reports : Ein Impact Factor für Bibliotheken, Verlage und Autoren? (2001)
0.01
0.0068351394 = product of:
0.020505417 = sum of:
0.020505417 = product of:
0.041010834 = sum of:
0.041010834 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041010834 = score(doc=5915,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18082327 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.044043828 = queryNorm
0.22680065 = fieldWeight in 5915, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5915)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Gibt es objektive Kriterien für die Bestellung und Abbestellung wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften? Wie lange sollte eine Bibliothek Periodikabestände benutzernah aufstellen? Kann ein Verlag -außer via Verkaufszahlen - auf Kriterien des Erfolgs seiner Zeitschriften zurückgreifen? Hat ein Autor eine Entscheidungsgrundlage, welcher Zeitschrift er seinen Artikel anbietet? Ist die Forschungsaktivität eines Instituts oder eines Wissenschaftlers über den Impact derjenigen Zeitschriftentitel zu evaluieren, die die Forschungsergebnisse drucken? Können die 'Journal Citation Reports (JCR) "des "Institute for Scientific Information" bei der Klärung solcher Fragen helfen? Sind die JCR ein nützliches oder gar ein notwendiges Hilfsmittel für Bibliotheken, für Verlage, für Wissenschaftsmanager und für wissenschaftliche Autoren? Die 'Journal Citation Reports" geben im Jahresrhythmus informetrische Kennzahlen wie die Zitationsrate, den Impact Factor, den Immediacy Index, die Halbwertszeit für eine Auswahl wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriften an. Zusätzlich berichten sie darüber, weiche Zeitschriften weiche anderen Zeitschriften zitieren bzw. von diesen zitiert werden, so dass "Soziogramme" wissenschaftlicher Zeitschriftenkommunikation entstehen. Wir wollen am Beispiel des aktuellen Jahrgangs ( 1999) die JCR detailliert beschreiben, die Auswahlkriterien der Zeitschriften beleuchten, die verwendeten informetrischen Kennwerte - vor allem den Impact Factor - kritisch hinterfragen, um danach die Einsatzgebiete bei Bibliotheken, in der Wissenschaftsevaluation, bei Verlagen und bei Autoren zu diskutieren. Das Fazit sei vorweggenommen: Die JCR sind ein nicht umgehbares Hilfsmittel für die fokussierten Anwendungsbereiche. Sie sind mitnichten frei von Problemen. Wir schließen daher mit einigen Verbesserungsvorschlägen
