Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.006396982 = product of:
  0.044778872 = sum of:
    0.044778872 = weight(_text_:institut in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044778872 = score(doc=474,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1470384 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.512738 = idf(docFreq=484, maxDocs=44218)
          0.026672479 = queryNorm
        0.30453864 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.512738 = idf(docFreq=484, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
  2. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.005734021 = product of:
  0.020069072 = sum of:
    0.01103469 = product of:
      0.03310407 = sum of:
        0.03310407 = weight(_text_:f in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03310407 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.31138954 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.009034382 = product of:
      0.018068764 = sum of:
        0.018068764 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018068764 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.004130003 = product of:
  0.02891002 = sum of:
    0.02891002 = product of:
      0.05782004 = sum of:
        0.05782004 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05782004 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036504413 = product of:
  0.025553089 = sum of:
    0.025553089 = product of:
      0.051106177 = sum of:
        0.051106177 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051106177 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.00 
    0.0023800144 = product of:
  0.0166601 = sum of:
    0.0166601 = product of:
      0.0333202 = sum of:
        0.0333202 = weight(_text_:berlin in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0333202 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10719733 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.019024 = idf(docFreq=2159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.3108305 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.019024 = idf(docFreq=2159, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Herausforderungen an die Informationswirtschaft: Informationsverdichtung, Informationsbewertung und Datenvisualisierung. Proceedings des 5. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI'96), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 17.-19. Oktober 1996. Hrsg.: J. Krause u.a
  6. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.002190265 = product of:
  0.015331855 = sum of:
    0.015331855 = product of:
      0.03066371 = sum of:
        0.03066371 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03066371 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  7. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature II (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017834753 = product of:
  0.012484326 = sum of:
    0.012484326 = product of:
      0.037452977 = sum of:
        0.037452977 = weight(_text_:f in 7105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037452977 = score(doc=7105,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7105, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7105)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  8. Osareh, F.: Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis : a review of literature I (1996) 0.00 
    0.0017834753 = product of:
  0.012484326 = sum of:
    0.012484326 = product of:
      0.037452977 = sum of:
        0.037452977 = weight(_text_:f in 7170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037452977 = score(doc=7170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.35229704 = fieldWeight in 7170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7170)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  9. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  10. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  11. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00 
    0.0015487511 = product of:
  0.010841258 = sum of:
    0.010841258 = product of:
      0.021682516 = sum of:
        0.021682516 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021682516 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  12. Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007) 0.00 
    0.001114672 = product of:
  0.007802704 = sum of:
    0.007802704 = product of:
      0.023408111 = sum of:
        0.023408111 = weight(_text_:f in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023408111 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.22018565 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  13. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.00 
    0.0010325008 = product of:
  0.007227505 = sum of:
    0.007227505 = product of:
      0.01445501 = sum of:
        0.01445501 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01445501 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.093402475 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35
  14. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.00 
    8.9173764E-4 = product of:
  0.006242163 = sum of:
    0.006242163 = product of:
      0.018726489 = sum of:
        0.018726489 = weight(_text_:f in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018726489 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10631079 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.17614852 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.985786 = idf(docFreq=2232, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    Top Ten der meistzitierten Forscher nach Institutionen: Harvard - Stanford - UC, San Diego - MIT - National Cancer Institute - UC, San Francisco - Cornell - UC, Berkeley - University College, London - CalTech Top Ten der meistzitierten Forscher nach Ländern:USA - GB - BRD - CND - Japan - F - CH - S - I - AUS - AU
  15. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.00 
    7.820761E-4 = product of:
  0.0054745325 = sum of:
    0.0054745325 = product of:
      0.02189813 = sum of:
        0.02189813 = weight(_text_:m in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02189813 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  16. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.00 
    7.820761E-4 = product of:
  0.0054745325 = sum of:
    0.0054745325 = product of:
      0.02189813 = sum of:
        0.02189813 = weight(_text_:m in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02189813 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.3299248 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  17. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023) 0.00 
    5.644148E-4 = product of:
  0.003950903 = sum of:
    0.003950903 = product of:
      0.015803613 = sum of:
        0.015803613 = weight(_text_:m in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015803613 = score(doc=1033,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  18. Persson, O.; Beckmann, M.: Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities (1995) 0.00 
    5.2138406E-4 = product of:
  0.003649688 = sum of:
    0.003649688 = product of:
      0.014598752 = sum of:
        0.014598752 = weight(_text_:m in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014598752 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  19. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.00 
    5.2138406E-4 = product of:
  0.003649688 = sum of:
    0.003649688 = product of:
      0.014598752 = sum of:
        0.014598752 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014598752 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  20. Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996) 0.00 
    4.5621104E-4 = product of:
  0.0031934772 = sum of:
    0.0031934772 = product of:
      0.012773909 = sum of:
        0.012773909 = weight(_text_:m in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012773909 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.066373095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026672479 = queryNorm
            0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 22
  • d 7
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Themes