-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.03
0.028283251 = product of:
0.056566503 = sum of:
0.056566503 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.052956846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052956846 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.858-862
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024964094 = product of:
0.04992819 = sum of:
0.04992819 = product of:
0.09985638 = sum of:
0.09985638 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09985638 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02206535 = product of:
0.0441307 = sum of:
0.0441307 = product of:
0.0882614 = sum of:
0.0882614 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0882614 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.02
0.021275483 = product of:
0.042550966 = sum of:
0.042550966 = sum of:
0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051048263 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03744614 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.1, S.124-125
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.02
0.0205279 = product of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03744614 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.9, S.1263-1274
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.02
0.0205279 = product of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.0410558 = sum of:
0.003609657 = weight(_text_:s in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.003609657 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.03744614 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03744614 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
- Source
- Information processing and management. 42(2006) no.6, S.1451-1464
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.02
0.017106583 = product of:
0.034213167 = sum of:
0.034213167 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = weight(_text_:s in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0030080476 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.03120512 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03120512 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
- Source
- Mitteilungen der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. 61(2008) H.2, S.14-20
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0136852665 = product of:
0.027370533 = sum of:
0.027370533 = sum of:
0.002406438 = weight(_text_:s in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.002406438 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.048049565 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.024964094 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024964094 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16130796 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.6, S.549-568
-
¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000)
0.00
0.0030080476 = product of:
0.006016095 = sum of:
0.006016095 = product of:
0.01203219 = sum of:
0.01203219 = weight(_text_:s in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01203219 = score(doc=461,freq=8.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.24024783 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
- Pages
- 564 S
- Type
- s
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002)
0.00
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = product of:
0.008422533 = sum of:
0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008422533 = score(doc=2584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
-
Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001)
0.00
0.0021056333 = product of:
0.0042112665 = sum of:
0.0042112665 = product of:
0.008422533 = sum of:
0.008422533 = weight(_text_:s in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008422533 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.16817348 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 27(2001) no.1, S.1-7
-
Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002)
0.00
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = product of:
0.007219314 = sum of:
0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007219314 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
-
Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002)
0.00
0.0018048285 = product of:
0.003609657 = sum of:
0.003609657 = product of:
0.007219314 = sum of:
0.007219314 = weight(_text_:s in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007219314 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Scientometrics. 54(2002) no.2, S.155-178
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.00
0.0017016088 = product of:
0.0034032175 = sum of:
0.0034032175 = product of:
0.006806435 = sum of:
0.006806435 = weight(_text_:s in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006806435 = score(doc=1064,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.1359047 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1395-1402
-
Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004)
0.00
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = product of:
0.006016095 = sum of:
0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006016095 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
-
Cronin, B.: Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics (2000)
0.00
0.0015040238 = product of:
0.0030080476 = sum of:
0.0030080476 = product of:
0.006016095 = sum of:
0.006016095 = weight(_text_:s in 4542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006016095 = score(doc=4542,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.120123915 = fieldWeight in 4542, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4542)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 56(2000) no.4, S.440-453
-
Brody, T.; Harnad, S.; Carr, L.: Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact (2006)
0.00
0.0014889077 = product of:
0.0029778155 = sum of:
0.0029778155 = product of:
0.005955631 = sum of:
0.005955631 = weight(_text_:s in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005955631 = score(doc=165,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.118916616 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.8, S.1060-1072
-
Knothe, G.: Comparative citation analysis of duplicate or highly related publications (2006)
0.00
0.001302523 = product of:
0.002605046 = sum of:
0.002605046 = product of:
0.005210092 = sum of:
0.005210092 = weight(_text_:s in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005210092 = score(doc=213,freq=6.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Four cases, illustrated by four examples, of duplicate or highly related publications can be distinguished and are analyzed here using citation data obtained from the Science Citation Index (SCI): (1) publication by different authors in the same journal; (2) the same author(s) publishing in different journals; (3) publication by different authors in different journals; (4) the same author(s) publishing highly related papers simultaneously in the same journal, often as part of a series of papers. Example 1, illustrating case 1, is an occurrence of highly related publications in mechanistic organic chemistry. Example 2, from analytical organic chemistry, contains elements of cases 2 and 3. Example 3, dealing solely with case 3, discusses two time-delayed publications from analytical biochemistry, which were highlighted by Garfield several times in the past to show how the SCI could be utilized to avoid duplicate publication. Example 4, derived from synthetic organic chemistry (total syntheses of taxol), contains elements of cases 1, 3, and 4 and, to a lesser extent, case 2. The citation records of the highly related or duplicate publications can deviate considerably from the journal impact factors; this was observed in three of the four examples relating to cases 2, 3, and 4. The examples suggest that citation of a paper may depend significantly on the journal in which it is published. As an indicator of this dependence, the journals in which the papers used in the present examples appeared were examined. Other factors such as key words in the paper title may also play a role.
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.13, S.1830-1839
-
Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002)
0.00
0.0012762066 = product of:
0.0025524131 = sum of:
0.0025524131 = product of:
0.0051048263 = sum of:
0.0051048263 = weight(_text_:s in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0051048263 = score(doc=602,freq=4.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.101928525 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.678.689
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Will this paper ever be cited? (2002)
0.00
0.001203219 = product of:
0.002406438 = sum of:
0.002406438 = product of:
0.004812876 = sum of:
0.004812876 = weight(_text_:s in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004812876 = score(doc=3183,freq=2.0), product of:
0.05008241 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046063907 = queryNorm
0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.232-235
