-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.024385443 = product of:
0.048770886 = sum of:
0.048770886 = product of:
0.09754177 = sum of:
0.09754177 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09754177 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.02155389 = product of:
0.04310778 = sum of:
0.04310778 = product of:
0.08621556 = sum of:
0.08621556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08621556 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.012932335 = product of:
0.02586467 = sum of:
0.02586467 = product of:
0.05172934 = sum of:
0.05172934 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05172934 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.01
0.009144541 = product of:
0.018289082 = sum of:
0.018289082 = product of:
0.036578164 = sum of:
0.036578164 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036578164 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.009144541 = product of:
0.018289082 = sum of:
0.018289082 = product of:
0.036578164 = sum of:
0.036578164 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036578164 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.01
0.009144541 = product of:
0.018289082 = sum of:
0.018289082 = product of:
0.036578164 = sum of:
0.036578164 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036578164 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.007620451 = product of:
0.015240902 = sum of:
0.015240902 = product of:
0.030481804 = sum of:
0.030481804 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030481804 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
White, H.D.; Wellman, B.; Nazer, N.: Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? : Longitudinal Evidence From the "Globenet" Interdisciplinary Research Group (2004)
0.01
0.007484437 = product of:
0.014968874 = sum of:
0.014968874 = product of:
0.029937748 = sum of:
0.029937748 = weight(_text_:1993 in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029937748 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.17147636 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Many authors have posited a social component in citation, the consensus being that the citers and citees often have interpersonal as well as intellectual ties. Evidence for this belief has been rather meager, however, in part because social networks researchers have lacked bibliometric data (e.g., pairwise citation counts from online databases), and citation analysts have lacked sociometric data (e.g., pairwise measures of acquaintanceship). In 1997 Nazer extensively measured personal relationships and communication behaviors in what we call "Globenet," an international group of 16 researchers from seven disciplines that was established in 1993 to study human development. Since Globenet's membership is known, it was possible during 2002 to obtain citation records for all members in databases of the Institute for Scientific Information. This permitted examination of how members cited each other (intercited) in journal articles over the past three decades and in a 1999 book to which they all contributed. It was also possible to explore links between the intercitation data and the social and communication data. Using network-analytic techniques, we look at the growth of intercitation over time, the extent to which it follows disciplinary or interdisciplinary lines, whether it covaries with degrees of acquaintanceship, whether it reflects Globenet's organizational structure, whether it is associated with particular in-group communication patterns, and whether it is related to the cocitation of Globenet members. Results show cocitation to be a powerful predictor of intercitation in the journal articles, while being an editor or co-author is an important predictor in the book. Intellectual ties based an shared content did better as predictors than content-neutral social ties like friendship. However, interciters in Globenet communicated more than did noninterciters.
-
Haridasan, S.; Kulshrestha, V.K.: Citation analysis of scholarly communication in the journal Knowledge Organization (2007)
0.01
0.007484437 = product of:
0.014968874 = sum of:
0.014968874 = product of:
0.029937748 = sum of:
0.029937748 = weight(_text_:1993 in 863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029937748 = score(doc=863,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17458819 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.17147636 = fieldWeight in 863, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8800673 = idf(docFreq=2481, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=863)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose - Citation analysis is one of the popular methods employed for identification of core documents and complex relationship between citing and cited documents for a particular scholarly community in a geographical proximity. The present citation study is to understand the information needs, use pattern and use behaviour of library and information science researchers particularly engaged in the field of knowledge organization. Design/methodology/approach - The data relating to all the references appended to the articles during the period under study were collected and tabulated. Findings - Citation analysis of the journal for the period under study reveals that the average number of citations is around 21 per article. The major source of information is books and documents published during the later half of the century (1982-91). Authors from the USA, UK and Germany are the major contributors to the journal. India is ranked seventh in terms of contributions. Research limitations/implications - The study undertaken is limited to nine years, i.e. 1993-2001. The model citation index of the journal is analyzed using the first seven core authors. Practical implications - Ranking of periodicals helps to identify the core periodicals cited in the journal Knowledge Organization. Ranking of authors is done to know the eminent personalities in the subject, whose work is used by the authors to refine their ideas on the subject or topic. Originality/value - Model Citation Index for the first seven most cited authors was worked out and it reveals the historical relationship of cited and citing documents. This model citation index can be used to identify, the most cited authors as researchers currently working on special problems, to determine whether a paper has been cited, whether there has been a review of a subject, whether a concept has been applied, a theory confirmed or a method improved.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0060963607 = product of:
0.0121927215 = sum of:
0.0121927215 = product of:
0.024385443 = sum of:
0.024385443 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024385443 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15756895 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.044996176 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
