Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Morris, S.A.; Yen, G.; Wu, Z.; Asnake, B.: Time line visualization of research fronts (2003) 0.02
    0.024656197 = product of:
      0.12328098 = sum of:
        0.12328098 = weight(_text_:line in 1452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12328098 = score(doc=1452,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.4337094 = fieldWeight in 1452, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1452)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02
    0.02197589 = product of:
      0.10987945 = sum of:
        0.10987945 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10987945 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02
    0.019424126 = product of:
      0.09712063 = sum of:
        0.09712063 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09712063 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  4. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.02
    0.017611569 = product of:
      0.08805784 = sum of:
        0.08805784 = weight(_text_:line in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08805784 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28424788 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.30979243 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.6078424 = idf(docFreq=440, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
  5. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.011654477 = product of:
      0.05827238 = sum of:
        0.05827238 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05827238 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  6. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01
    0.008240959 = product of:
      0.04120479 = sum of:
        0.04120479 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04120479 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  7. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.008240959 = product of:
      0.04120479 = sum of:
        0.04120479 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04120479 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  8. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01
    0.008240959 = product of:
      0.04120479 = sum of:
        0.04120479 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04120479 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  9. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01
    0.0068674656 = product of:
      0.034337327 = sum of:
        0.034337327 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034337327 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  10. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01
    0.0054939725 = product of:
      0.027469862 = sum of:
        0.027469862 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027469862 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17749922 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050687566 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35