Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Salah, A.A.A.: Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index : the journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus "digital humanities" as a topic (2010) 0.04 
    0.03815789 = product of:
  0.09539472 = sum of:
    0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026986076 = score(doc=3436,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
    0.068408646 = weight(_text_:social in 3436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068408646 = score(doc=3436,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.3738355 = fieldWeight in 3436, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3436)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    The possibilities of using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) for journal mapping have not been sufficiently recognized because of the absence of a Journal Citations Report (JCR) for this database. A quasi-JCR for the A&HCI ([2008]) was constructed from the data contained in the Web of Science and is used for the evaluation of two journals as examples: Leonardo and Art Journal. The maps on the basis of the aggregated journal-journal citations within this domain can be compared with maps including references to journals in the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index. Art journals are cited by (social) science journals more than by other art journals, but these journals draw upon one another in terms of their own references. This cultural impact in terms of being cited is not found when documents with a topic such as digital humanities are analyzed. This community of practice functions more as an intellectual organizer than a journal.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.4, S.787-801
  2. Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F.de; Guerrero-Bote, V.P.: Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data : a comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI (2010) 0.03 
    0.02511943 = product of:
  0.062798575 = sum of:
    0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022488397 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
    0.04031018 = weight(_text_:social in 3335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04031018 = score(doc=3335,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18299131 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.22028469 = fieldWeight in 3335, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9875789 = idf(docFreq=2228, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3335)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Using the Scopus dataset (1996-2007) a grand matrix of aggregated journal-journal citations was constructed. This matrix can be compared in terms of the network structures with the matrix contained in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) of the Institute of Scientific Information (ISI). Because the Scopus database contains a larger number of journals and covers the humanities, one would expect richer maps. However, the matrix is in this case sparser than in the case of the ISI data. This is because of (a) the larger number of journals covered by Scopus and (b) the historical record of citations older than 10 years contained in the ISI database. When the data is highly structured, as in the case of large journals, the maps are comparable, although one may have to vary a threshold (because of the differences in densities). In the case of interdisciplinary journals and journals in the social sciences and humanities, the new database does not add a lot to what is possible with the ISI databases.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.352-369
  3. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis : a study of uncited and seldom-cited influences (2010) 0.01 
    0.007196287 = product of:
  0.035981435 = sum of:
    0.035981435 = weight(_text_:technology in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035981435 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.2632547 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.1, S.1-12
  4. Hellqvist, B.: Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis (2010) 0.01 
    0.0062967516 = product of:
  0.03148376 = sum of:
    0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 3329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03148376 = score(doc=3329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 3329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3329)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.2, S.310-318
  5. MacRoberts, M.H.; MacRoberts, B.R.: ¬The mismeasure of science : citation analysis (2018) 0.01 
    0.0062967516 = product of:
  0.03148376 = sum of:
    0.03148376 = weight(_text_:technology in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03148376 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.23034787 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.3, S.474-482
  6. Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T.: Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge : a new routine (2013) 0.01 
    0.005397215 = product of:
  0.026986076 = sum of:
    0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026986076 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.5, S.1076-1080
  7. Ardanuy, J.: Sixty years of citation analysis studies in the humanities (1951-2010) (2013) 0.01 
    0.005397215 = product of:
  0.026986076 = sum of:
    0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026986076 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.8, S.1751-1755
  8. Boyack, K.W.; Small, H.; Klavans, R.: Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text (2013) 0.01 
    0.005397215 = product of:
  0.026986076 = sum of:
    0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 1036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026986076 = score(doc=1036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 1036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1036)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.9, S.1759-17676
  9. Hu, X.; Rousseau, R.: Do citation chimeras exist? : The case of under-cited influential articles suffering delayed recognition (2019) 0.01 
    0.005397215 = product of:
  0.026986076 = sum of:
    0.026986076 = weight(_text_:technology in 5217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026986076 = score(doc=5217,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.19744103 = fieldWeight in 5217, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5217)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 70(2019) no.5, S.499-508
  10. Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010) 0.00 
    0.0044976794 = product of:
  0.022488397 = sum of:
    0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022488397 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.10, S.2061-20690
  11. Heneberg, P.: Lifting the fog of scientometric research artifacts : on the scientometric analysis of environmental tobacco smoke research (2013) 0.00 
    0.0044976794 = product of:
  0.022488397 = sum of:
    0.022488397 = weight(_text_:technology in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022488397 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13667917 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04589033 = queryNorm
        0.16453418 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.978387 = idf(docFreq=6114, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64(2013) no.2, S.334-344

Authors