Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.03 
    0.031754173 = product of:
  0.19052503 = sum of:
    0.19052503 = sum of:
      0.11888256 = weight(_text_:1000 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11888256 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2582832 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.46027988 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07164246 = score(doc=5223,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1106-1112
    Year
    2002
  2. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.01 
    0.013930479 = product of:
  0.08358287 = sum of:
    0.08358287 = product of:
      0.16716574 = sum of:
        0.16716574 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16716574 = score(doc=2584,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
    Year
    2002
  3. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.01194041 = product of:
  0.07164246 = sum of:
    0.07164246 = product of:
      0.14328492 = sum of:
        0.14328492 = weight(_text_:2002 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14328492 = score(doc=472,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
    Year
    2002
  4. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.01 
    0.01194041 = product of:
  0.07164246 = sum of:
    0.07164246 = product of:
      0.14328492 = sum of:
        0.14328492 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14328492 = score(doc=4175,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 54(2002) no.2, S.155-178
    Year
    2002
  5. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.0109117385 = product of:
  0.032735214 = sum of:
    0.022655332 = product of:
      0.045310665 = sum of:
        0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045310665 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010079883 = product of:
      0.030239647 = sum of:
        0.030239647 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030239647 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  6. Burrell, Q.L.: Will this paper ever be cited? (2002) 0.01 
    0.007960273 = product of:
  0.047761638 = sum of:
    0.047761638 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095523275 = score(doc=3183,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 3183, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3183)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.3, S.232-235
    Year
    2002
  7. Cronin, B.; Shaw, D.: Banking (on) different forms of symbolic capital (2002) 0.01 
    0.007960273 = product of:
  0.047761638 = sum of:
    0.047761638 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095523275 = score(doc=1263,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 1263, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1267-1270
    Year
    2002
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002) 0.01 
    0.007960273 = product of:
  0.047761638 = sum of:
    0.047761638 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095523275 = score(doc=3765,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5990622 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of documentation. 58(2002) no.4, S.383-395
    Year
    2002
  9. Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002) 0.01 
    0.0069652395 = product of:
  0.041791435 = sum of:
    0.041791435 = product of:
      0.08358287 = sum of:
        0.08358287 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08358287 = score(doc=1249,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.12, S.987-994
    Year
    2002
  10. Whitley, K.M.: Analysis of SciFinder Scholar and Web of Science citation searches (2002) 0.01 
    0.0069652395 = product of:
  0.041791435 = sum of:
    0.041791435 = product of:
      0.08358287 = sum of:
        0.08358287 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08358287 = score(doc=1255,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.52417946 = fieldWeight in 1255, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1255)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.14, S.1210-1215
    Year
    2002
  11. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.0066748923 = product of:
  0.04004935 = sum of:
    0.04004935 = product of:
      0.0800987 = sum of:
        0.0800987 = weight(_text_:2002 in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0800987 = score(doc=474,freq=9.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.50232893 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
              3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                9.0 = termFreq=9.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.21-30
    Year
    2002
  12. ¬The Web of knowledge : Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield (2000) 0.01 
    0.006293148 = product of:
  0.037758887 = sum of:
    0.037758887 = product of:
      0.07551777 = sum of:
        0.07551777 = weight(_text_:2002 in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551777 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.4736002 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 28(2001) no.1, S.45-46 (M.J. López Huertas u. E. Jiménez-Contreras); Password 2002, H.3, S.14-19 (W.G. Stock)
  13. Chen, C.; Cribbin, T.; Macredie, R.; Morar, S.: Visualizing and tracking the growth of competing paradigms : two case studies (2002) 0.01 
    0.005970205 = product of:
  0.03582123 = sum of:
    0.03582123 = product of:
      0.07164246 = sum of:
        0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07164246 = score(doc=602,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 602, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=602)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.8, S.678.689
    Year
    2002
  14. Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002) 0.00 
    0.004975171 = product of:
  0.029851025 = sum of:
    0.029851025 = product of:
      0.05970205 = sum of:
        0.05970205 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05970205 = score(doc=5220,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.37441388 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1113-1119
    Year
    2002
  15. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.0044799484 = product of:
  0.026879689 = sum of:
    0.026879689 = product of:
      0.080639064 = sum of:
        0.080639064 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.080639064 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  16. Száva-Kováts, E.: Indirect-collective referencing (ICR) in the elite journal literature of physics : II: a literature science study on the level of communications (2002) 0.00 
    0.0039801365 = product of:
  0.023880819 = sum of:
    0.023880819 = product of:
      0.047761638 = sum of:
        0.047761638 = weight(_text_:2002 in 180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047761638 = score(doc=180,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.2995311 = fieldWeight in 180, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.1, S.47-56
    Year
    2002
  17. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.003959752 = product of:
  0.023758512 = sum of:
    0.023758512 = product of:
      0.07127553 = sum of:
        0.07127553 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07127553 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  18. Leydesdorff, L.; Bihui, J.: Mapping the Chinese Science Citation Database in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations (2005) 0.00 
    0.0037758888 = product of:
  0.022655332 = sum of:
    0.022655332 = product of:
      0.045310665 = sum of:
        0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045310665 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Methods developed for mapping the journal structure contained in aggregated journal-journal citations in the Science Citation Index (SCI; Thomson ISI, 2002) are applied to the Chinese Science Citation Database of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. This database covered 991 journals in 2001, of which only 37 originally had English titles; only 31 of which were covered by the SCI. Using factor-analytical and graph-analytical techniques, the authors show that the journal relations are dually structured. The main structure is the intellectual organization of the journals in journal groups (as in the international SCI), but the university-based journals provide an institutional layer that orients this structure towards practical ends (e.g., agriculture). This mechanism of integration is further distinguished from the role of general science journals. The Chinese Science Citation Database thus exhibits the characteristics of "Mode 2" or transdisciplinary science in the production of scientific knowledge more than its Western counterpart does. The contexts of application lead to correlation among the components.
  19. White, H.D.; Wellman, B.; Nazer, N.: Does Citation Reflect Social Structure? : Longitudinal Evidence From the "Globenet" Interdisciplinary Research Group (2004) 0.00 
    0.0025172592 = product of:
  0.015103555 = sum of:
    0.015103555 = product of:
      0.03020711 = sum of:
        0.03020711 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03020711 = score(doc=2095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.18944009 = fieldWeight in 2095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2095)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Many authors have posited a social component in citation, the consensus being that the citers and citees often have interpersonal as well as intellectual ties. Evidence for this belief has been rather meager, however, in part because social networks researchers have lacked bibliometric data (e.g., pairwise citation counts from online databases), and citation analysts have lacked sociometric data (e.g., pairwise measures of acquaintanceship). In 1997 Nazer extensively measured personal relationships and communication behaviors in what we call "Globenet," an international group of 16 researchers from seven disciplines that was established in 1993 to study human development. Since Globenet's membership is known, it was possible during 2002 to obtain citation records for all members in databases of the Institute for Scientific Information. This permitted examination of how members cited each other (intercited) in journal articles over the past three decades and in a 1999 book to which they all contributed. It was also possible to explore links between the intercitation data and the social and communication data. Using network-analytic techniques, we look at the growth of intercitation over time, the extent to which it follows disciplinary or interdisciplinary lines, whether it covaries with degrees of acquaintanceship, whether it reflects Globenet's organizational structure, whether it is associated with particular in-group communication patterns, and whether it is related to the cocitation of Globenet members. Results show cocitation to be a powerful predictor of intercitation in the journal articles, while being an editor or co-author is an important predictor in the book. Intellectual ties based an shared content did better as predictors than content-neutral social ties like friendship. However, interciters in Globenet communicated more than did noninterciters.
  20. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0023758514 = product of:
  0.014255108 = sum of:
    0.014255108 = product of:
      0.042765323 = sum of:
        0.042765323 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042765323 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35

Authors

Languages

  • e 32
  • d 5

Types

  • a 35
  • el 1
  • m 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes