-
Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995)
0.03
0.03114036 = product of:
0.06228072 = sum of:
0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060400415 = score(doc=2660,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=2660,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Sinnvolle forschungspolitische bzw. forschungsstrategische Entscheidungsprozesse bedürfen beim Wissenschafts- und Forschungsmanagement ausreichender Informationen hinsichtlich der Forschungsaktivitäten bestimmter Wissenschaftlergruppen, Institutionen bzw. Länder. Durch entsprechende Vergleichsuntersuchungen lassen sich u.a. auch thematische, länderweite bzw. zeitkritische Forschungsschwerpunkte herausarbeiten. Die folgende Arbeit skizziert die Möglichkeiten von Forschungsanalysen mittels Online-Datenbanken und verdeutlicht die spezifischen Möglichekeiten und Probleme am Beispiel von Arbeiten aus der Festkörperphysik
- Type
- a
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995)
0.03
0.027868655 = product of:
0.05573731 = sum of:
0.05338693 = weight(_text_:von in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05338693 = score(doc=2443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.416867 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.002350378 = product of:
0.007051134 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=2443,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Als Maß für die Produktivität und den Einfluß von Forschern, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen und Fachbereichen dienen häufig anhand von Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen erstellte Ranglisten. Doch nach welchen Kriterien sind die in elektronischen Fachdatenbanken gespeicherten Informationen auszuwerten, um ein einigermaßen zutreffendes Abbild der Forschungsleistung zu erhalten?
- Type
- a
-
Octavio, A.: ¬The '¬indexed' theorem (1996)
0.02
0.024644516 = product of:
0.049289033 = sum of:
0.04530031 = weight(_text_:von in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04530031 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.35372335 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.003988724 = product of:
0.011966172 = sum of:
0.011966172 = weight(_text_:a in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011966172 = score(doc=377,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.2161963 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch den Leserbrief von S. Göbel in: Mathematical intelligencer 19(1997) no.3, S.5-6
- Type
- a
-
Korwitz, U.: Welchen 'Rang' hat ein Wissenschaftler? (1995)
0.02
0.022294924 = product of:
0.044589847 = sum of:
0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042709544 = score(doc=2318,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=2318,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2318, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2318)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Für die Einschätzung der Relevanz der Arbeit von Wissenschaftlern wird in zunehmendem Maße deren Publikationsverhalten als Bewertungskriterium eingesetzt. Hierbei sind vor allem die Zahl der Publikationen sowie die wissenschaftliche Reputation des jeweiligen zeitschriftentitels von zentraler Bedeutung. Die vorliegenden Ausführungen geben einen kurzen Einblick in die Probleme bei der Beurteilung wissenschaftlicher Tätigkeit mit Hilfe der Zitationsanalyse
- Type
- a
-
Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996)
0.02
0.022294924 = product of:
0.044589847 = sum of:
0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042709544 = score(doc=5036,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
- Type
- a
-
Göbel, S.: What the Citation Index is good for (1997)
0.02
0.020537097 = product of:
0.041074194 = sum of:
0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03775026 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.0033239368 = product of:
0.0099718105 = sum of:
0.0099718105 = weight(_text_:a in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0099718105 = score(doc=376,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.18016359 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Ein Leserbrief zu Sinn und Nutzen des Science Citation Index als Erwiderung auf einen Beitrag von A. Octavio in Mathematical intelligencer 18(1996) no.4, S.9-11
- Type
- a
-
Schlaffer, H.: Selbstzitat (1997)
0.02
0.020050319 = product of:
0.040100638 = sum of:
0.03775026 = weight(_text_:von in 7464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03775026 = score(doc=7464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.29476947 = fieldWeight in 7464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7464)
0.002350378 = product of:
0.007051134 = sum of:
0.007051134 = weight(_text_:a in 7464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007051134 = score(doc=7464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 7464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7464)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- 'Zwischenruf' zur Zitierpraxis im Wissenschaftsbereich: "Jeder kann seine Plazierung auf dieser Weltrangliste gelehrter Eitelkeit verbessern, indem er sich so oft und andere so wenig wie möglich zitiert. Die Verbreitung des Ruhms, den man braucht, nimmt man am besten selbst in die Hand, von Jugend an"
- Type
- a
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.019223286 = product of:
0.07689314 = sum of:
0.07689314 = product of:
0.11533971 = sum of:
0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011281814 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.10405789 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10405789 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
- Type
- a
-
Shaw, W.M.: Subject and citation indexing : pt.2: the optimal, cluster-based retrieval performance of composite representations (1991)
0.02
0.016429678 = product of:
0.032859355 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=4842,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
0.0026591495 = product of:
0.007977448 = sum of:
0.007977448 = weight(_text_:a in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007977448 = score(doc=4842,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Fortsetzung von pt.1: experimental retrieval results are presented as a function of the exhaustivity and similarity of the composite representations and reveal consistent patterns from which optimal performance levels can be identified. The optimal performance values provide an assessment of the absolute capacity of each composite representation to associate documents relevant to different queries in single-link hierarchies. The effectiveness of the exhaustive representation composed of references and citations is materially superior to the effectiveness of exhaustive composite representations that include subject descriptions
- Type
- a
-
Göbel, S.: Aspekte der Mathematikliteratur : Untersuchungen in verschiedenen Datenbanken (1997)
0.02
0.016040254 = product of:
0.03208051 = sum of:
0.030200208 = weight(_text_:von in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030200208 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23581557 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
0.0018803024 = product of:
0.005640907 = sum of:
0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 2166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005640907 = score(doc=2166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 2166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2166)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Literaturdatenbanken wurden eigentlich mit zwei Zielen aufgebaut: einerseits Fachliteratur zu archivieren und zu dokumentieren und andererseits die Literaturhinweise den Wissenschaftlern für Recherchen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Aus diesen gespeicherten Datenmengen kann man baer auch allgemeine Erkenntnisse über die Literatur eines Fachgebietes und das Verhalten der Forscher gewinnen. Vor allem seit den sechziger Jahren, seit dem Aufbau des Science Citation Index - in dem man auch nach zitierten Arbeiten suchen kann - gibt es eine Fülle von informationswisenschaftlichen und wissenssoziologischen Untersuchungen mit Datenbanken
- Type
- a
-
Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996)
0.01
0.014035223 = product of:
0.028070446 = sum of:
0.026425181 = weight(_text_:von in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026425181 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.20633863 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
0.0016452647 = product of:
0.004935794 = sum of:
0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.004935794 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In einer früheren Studie wurde bereits der 'informationelle Mehrwert' von bibliographischen Datenbanken durch bibliometrische Nutzung untersucht. Im folgenden soll nun eine visuelle Oberfläche vorgestellt werden, die mit Hilfe einer bibliometrischen 'Sekundärdatenbank' einerseits die Nutzungsmöglichkeiten der zugrundeliegenden bibliographischen Datenbanken vor allem in den Bereichen Wissenschaftsinformation, Forschungsevaluation und Wissenschaftspolitik erweitern soll, andererseits aber auch eine Rückkopplung zu den Aufgaben des traditionellen Retrievals erlaubt. Die visuelle Oberfläche 'Visual Bibliometrics' ist eine Erweiterung des CD-Edition des 'Science Citation Index' und des 'Social Science Citation Index'
- Type
- a
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.0077249105 = product of:
0.030899642 = sum of:
0.030899642 = product of:
0.046349462 = sum of:
0.007327754 = weight(_text_:a in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007327754 = score(doc=4215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.039021708 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039021708 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Type
- a
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.0077249105 = product of:
0.030899642 = sum of:
0.030899642 = product of:
0.046349462 = sum of:
0.007327754 = weight(_text_:a in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007327754 = score(doc=3692,freq=6.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.039021708 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039021708 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16809508 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Type
- a
-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.00
0.0013295747 = product of:
0.005318299 = sum of:
0.005318299 = product of:
0.015954897 = sum of:
0.015954897 = weight(_text_:a in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015954897 = score(doc=6903,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.28826174 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- a
-
Fujigaki, Y.: ¬The citation system : citation networks as repeatedly focusing on difference, continuous re-evaluation, and as persistent knowledge accumulation (1998)
0.00
0.0012437033 = product of:
0.004974813 = sum of:
0.004974813 = product of:
0.014924439 = sum of:
0.014924439 = weight(_text_:a in 5129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014924439 = score(doc=5129,freq=14.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.26964417 = fieldWeight in 5129, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5129)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- States that it can be shown that claims of a lack of theories of citation are also indicative of a great need for a theory which links science dynamics and measurement. There is a wide gap between qualitative (science dynamics) and quantitative (measurement) approaches. To link them, proposes the use of the citation system, that potentially bridges a gap between measurement and epistemology, by applying system theory to the publication system
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
- Type
- a
-
Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990)
0.00
0.0011633779 = product of:
0.0046535116 = sum of:
0.0046535116 = product of:
0.013960535 = sum of:
0.013960535 = weight(_text_:a in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013960535 = score(doc=338,freq=4.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.25222903 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Type
- a
-
Sen, B.K.; Pandalai, T.A.; Karanjai, A.: Ranking of scientists - a new approach (1998)
0.00
0.0011514454 = product of:
0.0046057818 = sum of:
0.0046057818 = product of:
0.013817345 = sum of:
0.013817345 = weight(_text_:a in 5113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013817345 = score(doc=5113,freq=12.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.24964198 = fieldWeight in 5113, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5113)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A formula for the ranking of scientists based on diachronous citation counts is proposed. The paper generalises the fact that the citation generation potential (CGP) is not the same for all papers, it differs from paper to paper, and also to a certain extent depends on the subject domain of the papers. The method of ranking proposed in no way replaces peer review. It merely acts as an aid for peers to help them arrive at a better judgement.
- Type
- a
-
Yoon, L.L.: ¬The performance of cited references as an approach to information retrieval (1994)
0.00
0.0010882404 = product of:
0.0043529617 = sum of:
0.0043529617 = product of:
0.013058884 = sum of:
0.013058884 = weight(_text_:a in 8219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013058884 = score(doc=8219,freq=14.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.23593865 = fieldWeight in 8219, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8219)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Explores the relationship between the number of cited references used in a citation search and retrieval effectiveness. Focuses on analysing in terms of information retrieval effectiveness, the overlap among posting sets retrieved by various combinations of cited references. Findings from three case studies show the more cited references used for a citation search, the better the performance, in terms of retrieving more relevant documents, up to a point of diminishing returns. The overall level of overlap among relevant documents sets was found to be low. If only some of the cited references among many candidates are used for a citation search, a significant proportion of relevant documents may be missed. The characteristics of cited references showed that some variables are good indicators to predict relevance to a given question
- Type
- a
-
Kostoff, R.N.: ¬The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation (1998)
0.00
0.0010511212 = product of:
0.0042044846 = sum of:
0.0042044846 = product of:
0.012613453 = sum of:
0.012613453 = weight(_text_:a in 4129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012613453 = score(doc=4129,freq=10.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.22789092 = fieldWeight in 4129, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4129)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Leydesdorff, in his 1998 paper 'Theories of citation?', addresses the history of citations and citation analysis, and the transformation of a reference mechanism into a purportedly quantitative measure of research impact/quality. Examines different facets of citations and citation analysis, and discusses the validity of citation analysis as a useful measure of research impact/quality
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?'
- Type
- a
-
Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993)
0.00
0.0010177437 = product of:
0.004070975 = sum of:
0.004070975 = product of:
0.012212924 = sum of:
0.012212924 = weight(_text_:a in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012212924 = score(doc=5644,freq=24.0), product of:
0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.04800207 = queryNorm
0.22065444 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
- Type
- a
