-
McCain, K.W.: Core journal networks and and cocitation maps (1991)
0.07
0.070721425 = product of:
0.14144285 = sum of:
0.14144285 = product of:
0.2828857 = sum of:
0.2828857 = weight(_text_:maps in 6904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2828857 = score(doc=6904,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.9933516 = fieldWeight in 6904, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6904)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)
0.04
0.043756653 = product of:
0.087513305 = sum of:
0.087513305 = product of:
0.17502661 = sum of:
0.17502661 = weight(_text_:maps in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.17502661 = score(doc=3920,freq=4.0), product of:
0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.61460495 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Science mapping is discussed in the general context of information visualization. Attempts to construct maps of science using citation data are reviewed, focusing on the use of co-citation clusters. New work is reported on a dataset of about 36.000 documents using simplified methods for ordination, and nesting maps hierarchically. an overall map of the dataset shows the multidisciplinary breadth of the document sample, and submaps allow drilling down the document level. An effort to visualize these data using advanced virtual reality software is described, and the creation of document pathways through the map is seen as a realization of Bush's associative trails
-
Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994)
0.03
0.030940626 = product of:
0.06188125 = sum of:
0.06188125 = product of:
0.1237625 = sum of:
0.1237625 = weight(_text_:maps in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1237625 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.28477904 = queryWeight, product of:
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.43459132 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.619245 = idf(docFreq=435, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027465349 = product of:
0.054930698 = sum of:
0.054930698 = product of:
0.109861396 = sum of:
0.109861396 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.109861396 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.01
0.010299506 = product of:
0.020599011 = sum of:
0.020599011 = product of:
0.041198023 = sum of:
0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041198023 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.01
0.010299506 = product of:
0.020599011 = sum of:
0.020599011 = product of:
0.041198023 = sum of:
0.041198023 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041198023 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17747006 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.050679237 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
