-
Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008)
0.01
0.0077601387 = product of:
0.015520277 = sum of:
0.015520277 = product of:
0.031040555 = sum of:
0.031040555 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031040555 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2008 12:54:12
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.01
0.0067873057 = product of:
0.013574611 = sum of:
0.013574611 = product of:
0.027149223 = sum of:
0.027149223 = weight(_text_:m in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027149223 = score(doc=1033,freq=6.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.2381027 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Daquino, M.; Peroni, S.; Shotton, D.; Colavizza, G.; Ghavimi, B.; Lauscher, A.; Mayr, P.; Romanello, M.; Zumstein, P.: ¬The OpenCitations Data Model (2020)
0.01
0.0066501745 = product of:
0.013300349 = sum of:
0.013300349 = product of:
0.026600698 = sum of:
0.026600698 = weight(_text_:m in 38) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026600698 = score(doc=38,freq=4.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.23329206 = fieldWeight in 38, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=38)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Howard, D.L.: What the eye sees while predicitng a document's pertinence from its citation (1991)
0.01
0.0062698447 = product of:
0.012539689 = sum of:
0.012539689 = product of:
0.025079379 = sum of:
0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 3675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025079379 = score(doc=3675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- ASIS '91: systems understanding people. proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
-
Persson, O.; Beckmann, M.: Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities (1995)
0.01
0.0062698447 = product of:
0.012539689 = sum of:
0.012539689 = product of:
0.025079379 = sum of:
0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025079379 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.01
0.0062698447 = product of:
0.012539689 = sum of:
0.012539689 = product of:
0.025079379 = sum of:
0.025079379 = weight(_text_:m in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025079379 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006)
0.01
0.006208111 = product of:
0.012416222 = sum of:
0.012416222 = product of:
0.024832444 = sum of:
0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024832444 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:22:15
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.006208111 = product of:
0.012416222 = sum of:
0.012416222 = product of:
0.024832444 = sum of:
0.024832444 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024832444 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16045728 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Magri, M.; Solari, A.: ¬The SCI Journal Citation Reports : a potential tool for studying journals? (1996)
0.01
0.005486114 = product of:
0.010972228 = sum of:
0.010972228 = product of:
0.021944456 = sum of:
0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021944456 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997)
0.01
0.005486114 = product of:
0.010972228 = sum of:
0.010972228 = product of:
0.021944456 = sum of:
0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021944456 = score(doc=657,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Dynamic and evolutionary updates of classificatory schemes in scientific journal structures (2002)
0.01
0.005486114 = product of:
0.010972228 = sum of:
0.010972228 = product of:
0.021944456 = sum of:
0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021944456 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Can the inclusion of new journals in the Science Citation Index be used for the indication of structural change in the database, and how can this change be compared with reorganizations of reiations among previously included journals? Change in the number of journals (n) is distinguished from change in the number of journal categories (m). Although the number of journals can be considered as a given at each moment in time, the number of journal categories is based an a reconstruction that is time-stamped ex post. The reflexive reconstruction is in need of an update when new information becomes available in a next year. Implications of this shift towards an evolutionary perspective are specified.
-
Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: ¬The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its Web pages : an investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host university (2003)
0.01
0.005486114 = product of:
0.010972228 = sum of:
0.010972228 = product of:
0.021944456 = sum of:
0.021944456 = weight(_text_:m in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021944456 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.19245613 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000)
0.00
0.0047023837 = product of:
0.009404767 = sum of:
0.009404767 = product of:
0.018809535 = sum of:
0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018809535 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Content
- Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)
-
Prime-Claverie, C.; Beigbeder, M.; Lafouge, T.: Transposition of the cocitation method with a view to classifying Web pages (2004)
0.00
0.0047023837 = product of:
0.009404767 = sum of:
0.009404767 = product of:
0.018809535 = sum of:
0.018809535 = weight(_text_:m in 3095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018809535 = score(doc=3095,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 3095, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3095)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.: Extracting macroscopic information from Web links (2001)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 6851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=6851,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 6851, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6851)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.; Björneborn, L.: Webometrics (2004)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 4279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=4279,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 4279, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4279)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations : a multi-discipline exploratory analysis (2007)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=337,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 337, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=337)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Multiple publication on a single research study: does it pay? : The influence of number of research articles on total citation counts in biomedicine (2007)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=444,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientists may seek to report a single definable body of research in more than one publication, that is, in repeated reports of the same work or in fractional reports, in order to disseminate their research as widely as possible in the scientific community. Up to now, however, it has not been examined whether this strategy of "multiple publication" in fact leads to greater reception of the research. In the present study, we investigate the influence of number of articles reporting the results of a single study on reception in the scientific community (total citation counts of an article on a single study). Our data set consists of 96 applicants for a research fellowship from the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (BIF), an international foundation for the promotion of basic research in biomedicine. The applicants reported to us all articles that they had published within the framework of their doctoral research projects. On this single project, the applicants had published from 1 to 16 articles (M = 4; Mdn = 3). The results of a regression model with an interaction term show that the practice of multiple publication of research study results does in fact lead to greater reception of the research (higher total citation counts) in the scientific community. However, reception is dependent upon length of article: the longer the article, the more total citation counts increase with the number of articles. Thus, it pays for scientists to practice multiple publication of study results in the form of sizable reports.
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.00
0.003918653 = product of:
0.007837306 = sum of:
0.007837306 = product of:
0.015674612 = sum of:
0.015674612 = weight(_text_:m in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015674612 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.114023164 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.045820985 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
