Search (28 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Brooks, T.A.: Evidence of complex citer motivation (1986) 0.00
    0.0021279112 = product of:
      0.0042558224 = sum of:
        0.0042558224 = product of:
          0.008511645 = sum of:
            0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008511645 = score(doc=650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=650)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  2. Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983) 0.00
    0.0021279112 = product of:
      0.0042558224 = sum of:
        0.0042558224 = product of:
          0.008511645 = sum of:
            0.008511645 = weight(_text_:a in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008511645 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  3. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.00
    0.001823924 = product of:
      0.003647848 = sum of:
        0.003647848 = product of:
          0.007295696 = sum of:
            0.007295696 = weight(_text_:a in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007295696 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.00
    0.001823924 = product of:
      0.003647848 = sum of:
        0.003647848 = product of:
          0.007295696 = sum of:
            0.007295696 = weight(_text_:a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007295696 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  5. Rajan, T.N.; Guha, B.; Sayanarayana, R.: Associate relationship of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (1982) 0.00
    0.001823924 = product of:
      0.003647848 = sum of:
        0.003647848 = product of:
          0.007295696 = sum of:
            0.007295696 = weight(_text_:a in 58) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.007295696 = score(doc=58,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 58, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=58)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  6. MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989) 0.00
    0.0015795645 = product of:
      0.003159129 = sum of:
        0.003159129 = product of:
          0.006318258 = sum of:
            0.006318258 = weight(_text_:a in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006318258 = score(doc=2290,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.13239266 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
    Type
    a
  7. Malanga, G.: Classifying and screening journal literature with citation data (1982) 0.00
    0.0015199365 = product of:
      0.003039873 = sum of:
        0.003039873 = product of:
          0.006079746 = sum of:
            0.006079746 = weight(_text_:a in 553) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006079746 = score(doc=553,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 553, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=553)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Type
    a
  8. East, J.W.: Citations to conference papers and the implications for cataloging (1985) 0.00
    0.0015046606 = product of:
      0.0030093212 = sum of:
        0.0030093212 = product of:
          0.0060186423 = sum of:
            0.0060186423 = weight(_text_:a in 7928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0060186423 = score(doc=7928,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.04772363 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.041389145 = queryNorm
                0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 7928, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7928)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Problems in the cataloging of conference proceedings, and their treatment by some of the major cataloging codes, are briefly reviewed. To determine how conference papers are cited in the literature, and thus how researchers are likely to be seeking them in the catalog, fifty conference papers in the field of chemistry, delivered in 1970 and subsequently published, were searches in the Science Citation Index covering a ten-year period. The citations to the papers were examined to ascertain the implications of current citation practices for the cataloging of conference proceedings. The results suggest that conference proceedings are customarily cited like any other work of collective authorship and that the conference name is of little value as an access point
    Type
    a