Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03

0.026222296 = product of:
  0.052444592 = sum of:
    0.052444592 = product of:
      0.104889184 = sum of:
        0.104889184 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.104889184 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16943794 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04838555 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 7. 2.2005 14:10:22

Harter, S.P.; Nisonger, T.E.; Weng, A.: Semantic relationsships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals (1993) 0.02
```
0.015088951 = product of:
  0.030177902 = sum of:
    0.030177902 = product of:
      0.12071161 = sum of:
        0.12071161 = weight(_text_:author's in 5644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12071161 = score(doc=5644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3251583 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04838555 = queryNorm
            0.3712395 = fieldWeight in 5644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7201533 = idf(docFreq=144, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5644)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

The act of referencing another author's work in a scholarly or research paper is usually assumed to signal a direct semantic relationship between the citing and cited work. The present article reports a study that examines this assumption directly. The purpose of the research is to investigate the semantic relationship between citing and cited documents for a sample of document pairs in three journals in library and information science: 'Library journal', 'College and research libraries' and 'Journal of the American Society for Information Science'. A macroanalysis, absed on a comparison of the Library of Congress class numbers assigned citing and cited documents, and a microanalysis, based on a comparison of descriptors assigned citing and cited documents by three indexing and abstracting journals, ERIC, LISA and LiLi, were conducted. Both analyses suggest that the subject similarity among pairs of cited and citing documents is typically very small, supporting a subjective, psychological view of relevance and a trial-and-error, heuristic understanding of the information search and research processes. The results of the study have implications for collection development, for an understanding of psychological relevance, and for the results of doing information retrieval using cited references. Several intriguing methodological questions are raised for future research, including the role of indexing depth, specifity, and quality on the measurement of document similarity
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01
```
0.00983336 = product of:
  0.01966672 = sum of:
    0.01966672 = product of:
      0.03933344 = sum of:
        0.03933344 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03933344 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16943794 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04838555 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles

Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01

0.00983336 = product of:
  0.01966672 = sum of:
    0.01966672 = product of:
      0.03933344 = sum of:
        0.03933344 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03933344 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16943794 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04838555 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 5.1999 19:33:24

Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors