-
Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998)
0.06
0.06382397 = product of:
0.095735945 = sum of:
0.029306183 = weight(_text_:of in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029306183 = score(doc=3692,freq=24.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3591007 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
24.0 = termFreq=24.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.066429764 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to examine the patterns of self citation in 6 disciplines distributed among the physical and social sciences and humanities. Sample articles were examined to deermine the relative numbers and ages of self citations and citations to other in the bibliographies and to the exposure given to each type of citation in the text of the articles. significant differences were found in the number and age of citations between disciplines. Overall, 9% of all citations were self citations; 15% of physical sciences citations were self citations, as opposed to 6% in the social sciences and 3% in the humanities. Within disciplines, there was no significantly different amount of coverage between self citations and citations to others. Overall, it appears that a lack of substantive differences in self citation behaviour is consistent across disciplines
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:33:24
- Source
- Journal of information science. 24(1998) no.6, S.431-435
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.06
0.060238775 = product of:
0.09035816 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=4215,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.066429764 = sum of:
0.02400495 = weight(_text_:science in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02400495 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.042424813 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042424813 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18275474 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.4, S.302-310
-
Huber, C.: Web of science (1999)
0.05
0.051445797 = product of:
0.077168696 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=3595,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.045264166 = product of:
0.09052833 = sum of:
0.09052833 = weight(_text_:science in 3595) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09052833 = score(doc=3595,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 3595, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3595)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Object
- Web of science
-
Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998)
0.05
0.049496856 = product of:
0.07424528 = sum of:
0.03190453 = weight(_text_:of in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03190453 = score(doc=1023,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.39093933 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.04234075 = product of:
0.0846815 = sum of:
0.0846815 = weight(_text_:science in 1023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0846815 = score(doc=1023,freq=14.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.61599827 = fieldWeight in 1023, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1023)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Since the 'Science Citation Index' emerged within the system of scientific communication in 1964, an intense controversy about its character has been raging: in what sense can citation analysis be trusted? This debate can be characterized as the confrontation of different perspectives on science. Discusses the citation representation of science: the way the citation creates a new reality of as well as in the world of science; the main features of this reality; and some implications for science and science policy
- Footnote
- Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
-
Rosenberg, V.: ¬An assessment of ISI's new Web of Science : ISI's services brings citiation indexing to new and advanced researchers (1998)
0.05
0.04612389 = product of:
0.06918583 = sum of:
0.03453767 = weight(_text_:of in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03453767 = score(doc=1885,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.42320424 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.03464816 = product of:
0.06929632 = sum of:
0.06929632 = weight(_text_:science in 1885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06929632 = score(doc=1885,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.5040819 = fieldWeight in 1885, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1885)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Comments on the affinity of Web technology and citation indexes and reviews the ISI service, Web of Science. Although still requiring refinement, it multiplies the effectiveness of an already effective search tool
- Object
- Web of Science
-
Scharnhorst, A.: Citation - networks, science landscapes and evolutionary strategies (1998)
0.04
0.04260654 = product of:
0.06390981 = sum of:
0.02960988 = weight(_text_:of in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02960988 = score(doc=5126,freq=18.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.36282203 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
0.03429993 = product of:
0.06859986 = sum of:
0.06859986 = weight(_text_:science in 5126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06859986 = score(doc=5126,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.49901563 = fieldWeight in 5126, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5126)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The construction of virtual science landscapes based on citation networks and the strategic use of the information therein shed new light on the issues of the evolution of the science system and possibilities for control. Leydesdorff's approach to citation theory described in his 1998 article (see this issue of LISA) takes into account the dual layered character of communication networks and the second order nature of the science system. This perspective may help to sharpen the awareness of scientists and science policy makers for possible feedback loops within actions and activities in the science system, and probably nonlinear phenomena resulting therefrom. Sketches an additional link to geometrically oriented evolutionary theories and uses a specific landscape concept as a framework for some comments
- Footnote
- Contribution to a thematic issue devoted to 'Theories of citation?
-
Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)
0.04
0.041681975 = product of:
0.06252296 = sum of:
0.031211555 = weight(_text_:of in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031211555 = score(doc=3920,freq=20.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.031311408 = product of:
0.062622815 = sum of:
0.062622815 = weight(_text_:science in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062622815 = score(doc=3920,freq=10.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.45553684 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Science mapping is discussed in the general context of information visualization. Attempts to construct maps of science using citation data are reviewed, focusing on the use of co-citation clusters. New work is reported on a dataset of about 36.000 documents using simplified methods for ordination, and nesting maps hierarchically. an overall map of the dataset shows the multidisciplinary breadth of the document sample, and submaps allow drilling down the document level. An effort to visualize these data using advanced virtual reality software is described, and the creation of document pathways through the map is seen as a realization of Bush's associative trails
- Object
- Web of Science
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.9, S.799-813
-
Snyder, H.; Cronin, B.; Davenport, E.: What's the use of citation? : Citation analysis as a literature topic in selected disciplines of the social sciences (1995)
0.04
0.0414435 = product of:
0.06216525 = sum of:
0.03276531 = weight(_text_:of in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03276531 = score(doc=1825,freq=30.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4014868 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
30.0 = termFreq=30.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.029399939 = product of:
0.058799878 = sum of:
0.058799878 = weight(_text_:science in 1825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058799878 = score(doc=1825,freq=12.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.42772767 = fieldWeight in 1825, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1825)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a study to investigate the place and role of citation analysis in selected disciplines in the social sciences, including library and information science. 5 core library and information science periodicals: Journal of documentation; Library quarterly; Journal of the American Society for Information Science; College and research libraries; and the Journal of information science, were studed to determine the percentage of articles devoted to citation analysis and develop an indictive typology to categorize the major foci of research being conducted under the rubric of citation analysis. Similar analysis was conducted for periodicals in other social sciences disciplines. Demonstrates how the rubric can be used to dertermine how citatiion analysis is applied within library and information science and other disciplines. By isolating citation from bibliometrics in general, this work is differentiated from other, previous studies. Analysis of data from a 10 year sample of transdisciplinary social sciences literature suggests that 2 application areas predominate: the validity of citation as an evaluation tool; and impact or performance studies of authors, periodicals, and institutions
- Source
- Journal of information science. 21(1995) no.2, S.75-85
-
Alvarez, P.; Pulgarin, A.: ¬The Rasch model : measuring the impact of scientific journals: analytical chemistry (1996)
0.04
0.039757825 = product of:
0.059636734 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=8505,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 8505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=8505,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 8505, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8505)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Focuses on a way to determine a ranking of science journals according to the number of citations-to and items-published data used by Science Citation Insitute of Citation Reports of the Institute for Science Information to determine journal ranking by impact factor. Applies latent traits theory to bibliometrics
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 47(1996) no.6, S.458-467
-
Cawkell, T.: Checking research progress on 'image retrieval by shape matching' using the Web of Science (1998)
0.04
0.03947822 = product of:
0.05921733 = sum of:
0.031211555 = weight(_text_:of in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031211555 = score(doc=3571,freq=20.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
20.0 = termFreq=20.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=3571,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Discusses the Web of Science database recently introduced by ISI, and which is compiled from 8.000 journals covered in the SCI, SSCI and AHCI. Briefly compares the database with the Citation Indexes as provided by the BIDS service at the University of Bath. Explores the characteristics and usefulness of the WoS through a search of it for articles on the topic of image retrieval by shape matching. Suggests that the selection of articles of interest is much easier and far quicker using the WoS than other methods of conducting a search using ISI's data
- Object
- Web of Science
Science Citation Index
-
Braam, R.R.; Moed, H.F.; Raan, F.J. van: Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis : T.1: Structural aspects - T.2: Dynamical Aspects (1991)
0.04
0.03858435 = product of:
0.057876524 = sum of:
0.023928396 = weight(_text_:of in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023928396 = score(doc=1119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
0.033948127 = product of:
0.067896254 = sum of:
0.067896254 = weight(_text_:science in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067896254 = score(doc=1119,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.49389738 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 42(1991), S.233-251(T.1); S.252-266(T.2)
-
Bayer, A.E.; Smart, J.C.; McLaughlin, G.W.: Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author cocitations (1990)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=338,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=338,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 338, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=338)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.444-452
-
Shapiro, F.R.: Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing and citation analysis : the neglected legal literature (1992)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 4262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=4262,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 4262, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4262)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 4262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=4262,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 4262, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4262)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.337-339
-
Nazim, A.S.: Subject relationship between articles determined by co-occurrences of keywords in citing and cited titles (1993)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 6358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=6358,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 6358, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6358)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 6358) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=6358,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 6358, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6358)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of information science. 19(1993) no.3, S.225-231
-
Tsay, M.-Y.: From Science Citation Index to Journal Citation Reports, amd criteria for journals evaluation (1997)
0.04
0.037281495 = product of:
0.05592224 = sum of:
0.027916465 = weight(_text_:of in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027916465 = score(doc=657,freq=16.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.34207192 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.028005775 = product of:
0.05601155 = sum of:
0.05601155 = weight(_text_:science in 657) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05601155 = score(doc=657,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 657, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=657)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Investigates the characteristics of Journal Citation Reports (JCR) through the study of the Science Citation Index (SCI). Other criteria for evaluating a journal are also discussed. The compilation process of SCI data, and the characteristics, applications and limitations of SCI are studied. A detailed description of JCR is provided including: journal ranking listing, citing journal listing, cited journal listing, subject category listing, source data, impact factor, immediacy index, cited half-life and citing half-life. The applications and limitations of JCR are also explored. In addition to the criteria listed in JCR, the size, circulation and influence of journals are also considered significant criteria fir evaluation purposes
- Object
- Science Citation Index
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 4(1997) no.2, S.27-41
-
White, H.D.; McCain, K.W.: Visualizing a discipline : an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995 (1998)
0.04
0.036899112 = product of:
0.055348665 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=5020,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
0.027718531 = product of:
0.055437062 = sum of:
0.055437062 = weight(_text_:science in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055437062 = score(doc=5020,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Presents an extensive domain analysis of information science in terms of its authors. Names of those most frequently cited in 12 key journals from 1972 through 1995 were retrieved from Social SciSearch via Dialog. The top 120 were submitted to author co-citation analyzes, yielding automatic classifications relevant to histories of the field
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.4, S.327-355
-
Szava-Kovats, E.: Non-indexed indirect-collective citedness (NIICC) (1998)
0.04
0.036899112 = product of:
0.055348665 = sum of:
0.027630134 = weight(_text_:of in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027630134 = score(doc=175,freq=12.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
0.027718531 = product of:
0.055437062 = sum of:
0.055437062 = weight(_text_:science in 175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055437062 = score(doc=175,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 175, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=175)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Examines non-indexed indirect collective citedness (NIICC), through a study of 621 articles from 1969 volumes of 2 physics journals, in order to establish the frequency of the phenomenon in the research material. Findings refute the representativity ofd the citation indexes in the field of citedness in the scientific journal literature during the science history period of early Big Science as NIICC was found to be widespread
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 49(1998) no.5, S.477-481
-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=6903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=6903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.6, S.433-443
-
Kelland, J.L.; Young, A.P.: Citation patterns and library use (1998)
0.04
0.036377676 = product of:
0.05456651 = sum of:
0.02255991 = weight(_text_:of in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255991 = score(doc=1301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
0.0320066 = product of:
0.0640132 = sum of:
0.0640132 = weight(_text_:science in 1301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0640132 = score(doc=1301,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.4656509 = fieldWeight in 1301, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1301)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.61, [=Suppl.24]
-
Meng, L.: ¬The creation of [the] Chinese Science Citation Database : status quo and future development (1997)
0.04
0.035294186 = product of:
0.052941278 = sum of:
0.025222747 = weight(_text_:of in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025222747 = score(doc=954,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08160993 = queryWeight, product of:
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.3090647 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.027718531 = product of:
0.055437062 = sum of:
0.055437062 = weight(_text_:science in 954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055437062 = score(doc=954,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13747036 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.05218836 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 954, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The Chinese Science Citation Database (CSCD) is a significant document database on mainland China, which has been built up by the Documentation and Information Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Briefly introduces the background to CSCD, and discusses in detail its development and application, source journals and citation data, data processing methods, subject scope, compilation regulations, stylistic rules and layout, and usage directions for both the printed and CD-ROM editions of CSCD which have been published from the data
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 3(1997) no.4, S.39-54
