Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.01 
    0.007992683 = product of:
  0.02797439 = sum of:
    0.014757217 = product of:
      0.029514434 = sum of:
        0.029514434 = weight(_text_:online in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029514434 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013217172 = product of:
      0.039651513 = sum of:
        0.039651513 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039651513 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  2. Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999) 0.01 
    0.006303953 = product of:
  0.04412767 = sum of:
    0.04412767 = weight(_text_:software in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04412767 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03625353 = queryNorm
        0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Science mapping is discussed in the general context of information visualization. Attempts to construct maps of science using citation data are reviewed, focusing on the use of co-citation clusters. New work is reported on a dataset of about 36.000 documents using simplified methods for ordination, and nesting maps hierarchically. an overall map of the dataset shows the multidisciplinary breadth of the document sample, and submaps allow drilling down the document level. An effort to visualize these data using advanced virtual reality software is described, and the creation of document pathways through the map is seen as a realization of Bush's associative trails
  3. Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999) 0.01 
    0.005403389 = product of:
  0.03782372 = sum of:
    0.03782372 = weight(_text_:software in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03782372 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03625353 = queryNorm
        0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Autonomous Citation Indexing (ACI) automates the construction of citation indexes - Lower cost, wider availability: ACI is completely autonomous - no manual effort is required. This should result in lower cost and wider availability. Broader coverage: Because no manual effort is required, there are few barriers to indexing a broader range of literature, compared to indexes like the Science Citation Index that require manual effort. More timely feedback: Conference papers, technical reports, and preprints can be indexed, providing far more timely feedback in many cases (often such publications appear far in advance of corresponding journal publications). Citation context: ACI groups together the context of citations to a given article, allowing researchers to easily see what is being said and why the article was cited. Benefits for both literature search and evaluation. Freely available: Our implementation of ACI is available at no cost for non-commercial use. Several orgnizations have requested the software and expressed interest in providing an index within their domain, or in using ACI within their own digital libraries.
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.00 
    0.0037423645 = product of:
  0.02619655 = sum of:
    0.02619655 = product of:
      0.07858965 = sum of:
        0.07858965 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07858965 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Hauffe, H.: Zitationsanalysen : Editoral (1999) 0.00 
    0.0036893045 = product of:
  0.02582513 = sum of:
    0.02582513 = product of:
      0.05165026 = sum of:
        0.05165026 = weight(_text_:online in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05165026 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.3-6 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  6. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.00 
    0.0031950315 = product of:
  0.02236522 = sum of:
    0.02236522 = product of:
      0.04473044 = sum of:
        0.04473044 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04473044 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  7. Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995) 0.00 
    0.0029814085 = product of:
  0.020869859 = sum of:
    0.020869859 = product of:
      0.041739717 = sum of:
        0.041739717 = weight(_text_:online in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041739717 = score(doc=2660,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Sinnvolle forschungspolitische bzw. forschungsstrategische Entscheidungsprozesse bedürfen beim Wissenschafts- und Forschungsmanagement ausreichender Informationen hinsichtlich der Forschungsaktivitäten bestimmter Wissenschaftlergruppen, Institutionen bzw. Länder. Durch entsprechende Vergleichsuntersuchungen lassen sich u.a. auch thematische, länderweite bzw. zeitkritische Forschungsschwerpunkte herausarbeiten. Die folgende Arbeit skizziert die Möglichkeiten von Forschungsanalysen mittels Online-Datenbanken und verdeutlicht die spezifischen Möglichekeiten und Probleme am Beispiel von Arbeiten aus der Festkörperphysik
  8. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.00 
    0.0026352173 = product of:
  0.01844652 = sum of:
    0.01844652 = product of:
      0.03689304 = sum of:
        0.03689304 = weight(_text_:online in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03689304 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.7-21 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  9. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.00 
    0.0023602094 = product of:
  0.016521465 = sum of:
    0.016521465 = product of:
      0.04956439 = sum of:
        0.04956439 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04956439 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:19:32
  10. Marx, W.: Wie mißt man Forschungsqualität? : der Science Citation Index - ein Maßstab für die Bewertung (1996) 0.00 
    0.002108174 = product of:
  0.014757217 = sum of:
    0.014757217 = product of:
      0.029514434 = sum of:
        0.029514434 = weight(_text_:online in 5036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029514434 = score(doc=5036,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 5036, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5036)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Ein überfordertes Gutachter-System, knapper fließende Forschungsgelder sowie die starke Faszination von Ranglisten bewirken zunehmend den Einsatz bibliometrischer Methoden zur Messung von Forschungsqualität. Grundlage der meisten Bewertungen ist der Science Citation Index, der nun auch in der Version als Online-Datenbank für umfangreiche Analysen genutzt werden kann. Erweiterungen der Retrievalsprache beim Host STN International ermöglichen statistische Analysen, die bisher nur dem SCI-Hersteller und wenigen Spezialisten vorbehalten waren. Voraussetzung für eine sinnvolle Anwendung sind vor allem die Wahl geeigneter Selektionskriterien sowie die sorgfältige Interpretation der Ergebnisse im Rahmen der Grenzen dieser Methoden
  11. Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein Netz wissenschaftlicher Informationen : gesponnen aus Fußnoten (1999) 0.00 
    0.0015811304 = product of:
  0.011067913 = sum of:
    0.011067913 = product of:
      0.022135826 = sum of:
        0.022135826 = weight(_text_:online in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022135826 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Das ISI in Philadelphia bündelt seine großen Zitationsdatenbanken und bietet sie (vorzugsweise als Intranet-, aber auch als Internetlösung) als 'Web of Science'an. Im derzeitigen entwicklungsstand geht 'Web of Science' bis in die 70er Jahre zurück und weist damit knapp 20 Mill. Quellenartikel mit darin enthaltenen rund 300 Mill. Zitationen in einer einzigen datenbank nach. Neben 'gewohnten' Suchstrategien etwa nach Sachthemen oder Namen werden zitationsanalytische Suchstrategien geboten: Recherchen nach zitierter Literatur, nach zitierenden Artikeln und nach (im Sinne gemeinsamer Fußnoten) 'verwandten' Artikeln. Die Ausgabefunktionen umfassen Document Delivery via ISI sowie Links zu Artikeln, die parallel zur Druckausgabe im WWW erscheinen. Durch die Multidisziplinarität der ISI-Datenbanken sind als Kundenkreis vor allem Einrichtungen angesprochen, die mehrere Wissenschaftsfächer berühren. Hochschulbibliotheken oder Bibliotheken großer Forschungseinrichtungen dürften am 'Web of Science' kaum vorbeikommen. Parallele Produkte bei Online-Archiven, auf CD-ROM oder als Druckausgabe verlieren an Bedeutung
  12. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0014033866 = product of:
  0.009823706 = sum of:
    0.009823706 = product of:
      0.029471118 = sum of:
        0.029471118 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029471118 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  13. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0014033866 = product of:
  0.009823706 = sum of:
    0.009823706 = product of:
      0.029471118 = sum of:
        0.029471118 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029471118 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03625353 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 12
  • m 1

Themes