Search (30 results, page 2 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.D.: What do citation counts measure? : a review of studies on citing behavior (2008) 0.01 
    0.009897877 = product of:
  0.019795755 = sum of:
    0.019795755 = product of:
      0.03959151 = sum of:
        0.03959151 = weight(_text_:l in 1729) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03959151 = score(doc=1729,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.2195706 = fieldWeight in 1729, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1729)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01 
    0.009219662 = product of:
  0.018439325 = sum of:
    0.018439325 = product of:
      0.03687865 = sum of:
        0.03687865 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03687865 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  3. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.009219662 = product of:
  0.018439325 = sum of:
    0.018439325 = product of:
      0.03687865 = sum of:
        0.03687865 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03687865 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  4. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.009219662 = product of:
  0.018439325 = sum of:
    0.018439325 = product of:
      0.03687865 = sum of:
        0.03687865 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03687865 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  5. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.009219662 = product of:
  0.018439325 = sum of:
    0.018439325 = product of:
      0.03687865 = sum of:
        0.03687865 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03687865 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  6. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.009219662 = product of:
  0.018439325 = sum of:
    0.018439325 = product of:
      0.03687865 = sum of:
        0.03687865 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03687865 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  7. Frohlich, C.; Resler, L.: Analysis of publications and citations from a geophysics research institute (2001) 0.01 
    0.007918302 = product of:
  0.015836604 = sum of:
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = weight(_text_:l in 5797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031673208 = score(doc=5797,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 5797, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5797)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Bornmann, L.; Daniel, H.-D.: Selecting manuscripts for a high-impact journal through peer review : a citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere (2008) 0.01 
    0.007918302 = product of:
  0.015836604 = sum of:
    0.015836604 = product of:
      0.031673208 = sum of:
        0.031673208 = weight(_text_:l in 2381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031673208 = score(doc=2381,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18031335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.17565648 = fieldWeight in 2381, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9746525 = idf(docFreq=2257, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2381)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  9. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.01 
    0.0061464417 = product of:
  0.012292883 = sum of:
    0.012292883 = product of:
      0.024585767 = sum of:
        0.024585767 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024585767 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
  10. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.01 
    0.0061464417 = product of:
  0.012292883 = sum of:
    0.012292883 = product of:
      0.024585767 = sum of:
        0.024585767 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024585767 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15886335 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045365814 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35

Authors

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 5

Types

  • a 30
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes