-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.04
0.036528785 = sum of:
0.019377949 = product of:
0.11626769 = sum of:
0.11626769 = weight(_text_:authors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11626769 = score(doc=4215,freq=8.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.60441905 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.017150836 = product of:
0.034301672 = sum of:
0.034301672 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034301672 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006)
0.03
0.026839811 = sum of:
0.009688974 = product of:
0.058133844 = sum of:
0.058133844 = weight(_text_:authors in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058133844 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.017150836 = product of:
0.034301672 = sum of:
0.034301672 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034301672 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
- Date
- 3. 1.2007 17:22:03
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.03
0.02587736 = sum of:
0.01444347 = product of:
0.08666082 = sum of:
0.08666082 = weight(_text_:authors in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08666082 = score(doc=5171,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.45050737 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.011433891 = product of:
0.022867782 = sum of:
0.022867782 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022867782 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014)
0.03
0.025811529 = product of:
0.051623058 = sum of:
0.051623058 = sum of:
0.017321385 = weight(_text_:m in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017321385 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10500202 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.034301672 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034301672 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 16:52:04
-
Persson, O.; Beckmann, M.: Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialities (1995)
0.02
0.02446622 = sum of:
0.012918632 = product of:
0.07751179 = sum of:
0.07751179 = weight(_text_:authors in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07751179 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.40294603 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.01154759 = product of:
0.02309518 = sum of:
0.02309518 = weight(_text_:m in 3300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02309518 = score(doc=3300,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10500202 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.21994986 = fieldWeight in 3300, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3300)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.02
0.022867782 = product of:
0.045735564 = sum of:
0.045735564 = product of:
0.09147113 = sum of:
0.09147113 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09147113 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.02
0.022867782 = product of:
0.045735564 = sum of:
0.045735564 = product of:
0.09147113 = sum of:
0.09147113 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09147113 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.020212455 = product of:
0.04042491 = sum of:
0.04042491 = product of:
0.08084982 = sum of:
0.08084982 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08084982 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Marx, W.; Bornmann, L.; Cardona, M.: Reference standards and reference multipliers for the comparison of the citation impact of papers published in different time periods (2010)
0.02
0.01529139 = sum of:
0.008074146 = product of:
0.04844487 = sum of:
0.04844487 = weight(_text_:authors in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04844487 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.25184128 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.0072172442 = product of:
0.0144344885 = sum of:
0.0144344885 = weight(_text_:m in 3998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0144344885 = score(doc=3998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10500202 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.13746867 = fieldWeight in 3998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3998)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this study, reference standards and reference multipliers are suggested as a means to compare the citation impact of earlier research publications in physics (from the period of "Little Science" in the early 20th century) with that of contemporary papers (from the period of "Big Science," beginning around 1960). For the development of time-specific reference standards, the authors determined (a) the mean citation rates of papers in selected physics journals as well as (b) the mean citation rates of all papers in physics published in 1900 (Little Science) and in 2000 (Big Science); this was accomplished by relying on the processes of field-specific standardization in bibliometry. For the sake of developing reference multipliers with which the citation impact of earlier papers can be adjusted to the citation impact of contemporary papers, they combined the reference standards calculated for 1900 and 2000 into their ratio. The use of reference multipliers is demonstrated by means of two examples involving the time adjusted h index values for Max Planck and Albert Einstein.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.01
0.014292365 = product of:
0.02858473 = sum of:
0.02858473 = product of:
0.05716946 = sum of:
0.05716946 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05716946 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
McCain, K.W.: Mapping authors in intellectual space : a technical overview (1990)
0.01
0.012918632 = product of:
0.025837263 = sum of:
0.025837263 = product of:
0.15502357 = sum of:
0.15502357 = weight(_text_:authors in 6903) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15502357 = score(doc=6903,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.80589205 = fieldWeight in 6903, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6903)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.012127474 = product of:
0.024254948 = sum of:
0.024254948 = product of:
0.048509896 = sum of:
0.048509896 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048509896 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Moed, H.F.; Vriens, M.: Possible inaccuracies occuring in citation analysis (1989)
0.01
0.01154759 = product of:
0.02309518 = sum of:
0.02309518 = product of:
0.04619036 = sum of:
0.04619036 = weight(_text_:m in 6900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04619036 = score(doc=6900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10500202 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 6900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6900)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Cronin, B.: ¬The citation process : the role and significance in scientific communication (1984)
0.01
0.01154759 = product of:
0.02309518 = sum of:
0.02309518 = product of:
0.04619036 = sum of:
0.04619036 = weight(_text_:m in 7774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04619036 = score(doc=7774,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10500202 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.4398997 = fieldWeight in 7774, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7774)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Type
- m
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.011433891 = product of:
0.022867782 = sum of:
0.022867782 = product of:
0.045735564 = sum of:
0.045735564 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045735564 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Piternick, A.B.: Name of an author! (1992)
0.01
0.011418566 = product of:
0.022837132 = sum of:
0.022837132 = product of:
0.1370228 = sum of:
0.1370228 = weight(_text_:authors in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1370228 = score(doc=3293,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.7123147 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Citing authors' names in indexes and references can cause great difficulties, as ghosts, subterfuges, and collaborative teamwork may often obscure the true begetters of published works. Presents a collection of facts and findings about authors that relate in one way or another to their names
-
Lin, X.; White, H.D.; Buzydlowski, J.: Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching (2003)
0.01
0.010832603 = product of:
0.021665206 = sum of:
0.021665206 = product of:
0.12999123 = sum of:
0.12999123 = weight(_text_:authors in 1080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12999123 = score(doc=1080,freq=10.0), product of:
0.19236271 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.67576104 = fieldWeight in 1080, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1080)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Author searching is traditionally based on the matching of name strings. Special characteristics of authors as personal names and subject indicators are not considered. This makes it difficult to identify a set of related authors or to group authors by subjects in retrieval systems. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of a prototype visualization system to enhance author searching. The system, called AuthorLink, is based on author co-citation analysis and visualization mapping algorithms such as Kohonen's feature maps and Pathfinder networks. AuthorLink produces interactive author maps in real time from a database of 1.26 million records supplied by the Institute for Scientific Information. The maps show subject groupings and more fine-grained intellectual connections among authors. Through the interactive interface the user can take advantage of such information to refine queries and retrieve documents through point-and-click manipulation of the authors' names.
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.0100046545 = product of:
0.020009309 = sum of:
0.020009309 = product of:
0.040018618 = sum of:
0.040018618 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040018618 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.0100046545 = product of:
0.020009309 = sum of:
0.020009309 = product of:
0.040018618 = sum of:
0.040018618 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040018618 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
-
Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020)
0.01
0.0100046545 = product of:
0.020009309 = sum of:
0.020009309 = product of:
0.040018618 = sum of:
0.040018618 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040018618 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14776243 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04219578 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.11.2020 12:22:59
