-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.10
0.10027404 = product of:
0.20054808 = sum of:
0.20054808 = sum of:
0.09055878 = weight(_text_:j in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09055878 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.1099893 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1099893 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996)
0.06
0.05851969 = sum of:
0.037896696 = product of:
0.15158679 = sum of:
0.15158679 = weight(_text_:editors in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15158679 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34062007 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.020622993 = product of:
0.041245986 = sum of:
0.041245986 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041245986 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
-
Klitzing, N.; Hoekstra, R.; Strijbos, J.-W,: Literature practices : processes leading up to a citation (2019)
0.05
0.04573039 = sum of:
0.03158058 = product of:
0.12632231 = sum of:
0.12632231 = weight(_text_:editors in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12632231 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34062007 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.37085986 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.014149809 = product of:
0.028299619 = sum of:
0.028299619 = weight(_text_:j in 4628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028299619 = score(doc=4628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.17553353 = fieldWeight in 4628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose Literature practices represent the process leading up to the citation of a source, and consist of the selection, reading and citing of sources. The purpose of this paper is to explore possible factors that might influence researchers during this process and discover possible consequences of researchers' citation behaviours. Design/methodology/approach In this exploratory study, various factors which could influence literature practices were explored via a questionnaire amongst 112 researchers. Participants were first authors of articles published in 2016 in one of five different journals within the disciplines of experimental psychology, educational sciences and social psychology. Academic positions of the participants ranged from PhD student to full professor. Findings Frequencies and percentages showed that researchers seemed to be influenced in their literature practices by various factors, such as editors suggesting articles and motivation to cite. Additionally, a high percentage of researchers reported taking shortcuts when citing articles (e.g. using secondary citations and reading selectively). Logistic regression did not reveal a clear relationship between academic work experience and research practices. Practical implications Seeing that researchers seem to be influenced by a variety of factors in their literature practices, the scientific community might benefit from better citation practices and guidelines in order to provide more structure to the process of literature practices. Originality/value This paper provides first insights into researchers' literature practices. Possible reasons for problems with citation accuracy and replicating research findings are highlighted. Opportunities for further research on the topic of citation behaviours are presented.
-
Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006)
0.04
0.037602767 = product of:
0.075205535 = sum of:
0.075205535 = sum of:
0.033959545 = weight(_text_:j in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959545 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.041245986 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041245986 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2007 19:22:05
-
Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008)
0.04
0.037602767 = product of:
0.075205535 = sum of:
0.075205535 = sum of:
0.033959545 = weight(_text_:j in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033959545 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.21064025 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.041245986 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041245986 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 31. 7.2008 14:22:05
-
Garfield, E.: When to cite (1996)
0.04
0.035729345 = product of:
0.07145869 = sum of:
0.07145869 = product of:
0.28583476 = sum of:
0.28583476 = weight(_text_:editors in 7080) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.28583476 = score(doc=7080,freq=4.0), product of:
0.34062007 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.8391601 = fieldWeight in 7080, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7080)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In spite of numerous studies of citation behaviour and the wide recognition by journal editors of the need to acknowledge intellectual debts, authors and referees need explicit reminders as to when formal refrences or acknowledgements are appropriate. Notes a 3 year experiment involving graduate students which demonstrated the varying perceptions of the need for documentation off terminology, ideas and methods. Suggests a tentative tutorial for journal editors that should be modified in each scholarly context
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.03
0.027497325 = product of:
0.05499465 = sum of:
0.05499465 = product of:
0.1099893 = sum of:
0.1099893 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1099893 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.02
0.024304431 = product of:
0.048608862 = sum of:
0.048608862 = product of:
0.097217724 = sum of:
0.097217724 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.097217724 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992)
0.02
0.022639696 = product of:
0.04527939 = sum of:
0.04527939 = product of:
0.09055878 = sum of:
0.09055878 = weight(_text_:j in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09055878 = score(doc=2824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.5617073 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
-
Nicolaisen, J.: ¬The J-shaped distribution of citedness (2002)
0.02
0.019606551 = product of:
0.039213102 = sum of:
0.039213102 = product of:
0.078426205 = sum of:
0.078426205 = weight(_text_:j in 3765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.078426205 = score(doc=3765,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.48645282 = fieldWeight in 3765, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3765)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- A new approach for investigating the correlation between research quality and citation counts is presented and applied to a case study of the relationship between peer evaluations reflected in scholarly book reviews and the citation frequencies of reviewed books. Results of the study designate a J-shaped distribution between the considered variables, presumably caused by a skewed allocation of negative citations. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research.
-
New Web Citation Index (2004)
0.02
0.018948348 = product of:
0.037896696 = sum of:
0.037896696 = product of:
0.15158679 = sum of:
0.15158679 = weight(_text_:editors in 2270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15158679 = score(doc=2270,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34062007 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 2270, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2270)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Philadelphia, PA USA-London UK-Princeton, NJ February, 25, 2004 - Today, Thomson ISI and NEC Laboratories America (NEC) announced their collaboration to create a comprehensive, multidisciplinary citation index for Web-based scholarly resources. The new Web Citation Index(tm) will combine a suite of technologies developed by NEC, including "autonomous citation indexing" tools from NEC's CiteSeer environment, with the capabilities underlying ISI Web of KnowledgeSM. Thomson ISI editors will carefully monitor the quality of this new resource to ensure all indexed material meets the Thomson ISI high-quality standards. During 2004, Thomson ISI and NEC will operate a pilot of the new resource to receive feedback from the scientific and scholarly community. Full access to the index is projected for early 2005. When fully operational, the new resource will be a unique content collection within ISI Web of Knowledge. It will complement the Thomson ISI Web of Science(r), and provide researchers with a new gateway to discovery 4/3 using citation relationships among Web-based documents, such as pre-prints, proceedings, and "open access" research publications.
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.02
0.017185828 = product of:
0.034371655 = sum of:
0.034371655 = product of:
0.06874331 = sum of:
0.06874331 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06874331 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Brown, C.: ¬The evolution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers (2001)
0.02
0.01579029 = product of:
0.03158058 = sum of:
0.03158058 = product of:
0.12632231 = sum of:
0.12632231 = weight(_text_:editors in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.12632231 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
0.34062007 = queryWeight, product of:
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.37085986 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- In one of two bibliometric papers in this issue Brown looks at formal publication and citation of Eprints as shown by the policies and practices of 37 top tier physics journals, and by citation trends in ISI's SciSearch database and Journal Citation Reports. Citation analysis was carried out if Eprint cites were indicated by editor response, instruction to authors sections, reports in the literature, or actual examination of citation lists. Total contribution to 12 archives and their citation counts in the journals were compiled. Of the 13 editors surveyed that responded, 8 published papers that had appeared in the archive. Two of these required removal from the archive at publication; two of the 13 did not publish papers that have appeared as Eprints. A review journal that solicits its contributions allowed citation of Eprints. Seven allowed citations to Eprints, but were less than enthusiastic.Nearly 36,000 citations were made to the 12 archives. Citations to the 37 journals and their impact factors remain constant over the period of 1991 to 1998. Eprint citations appear to peak about 3 years after appearance as do citations to published papers. Contribution to the archives, and their use as measured by citation, is clearly growing. Citation form and publishing policy varies from journal to journal.
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.01458266 = product of:
0.02916532 = sum of:
0.02916532 = product of:
0.05833064 = sum of:
0.05833064 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05833064 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.01
0.014149809 = product of:
0.028299619 = sum of:
0.028299619 = product of:
0.056599237 = sum of:
0.056599237 = weight(_text_:j in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056599237 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: JASIS 50(1999) no.13, S.1259-1261 (J. Andersen)
-
Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999)
0.01
0.014149809 = product of:
0.028299619 = sum of:
0.028299619 = product of:
0.056599237 = sum of:
0.056599237 = weight(_text_:j in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056599237 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.35106707 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Zuerst publiziert in: Kommunikation statt Markt: Zu einer alternativen Theorie der Informationsgesellschaft. Hrsg.: J. Becker u. W. Göhring. Sankt Augustin: GMD. (GMD Report; 61) S.27-38.
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.01
0.013748663 = product of:
0.027497325 = sum of:
0.027497325 = product of:
0.05499465 = sum of:
0.05499465 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05499465 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
Pudovkin, A.I.; Garfield, E.: Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002)
0.01
0.012254095 = product of:
0.02450819 = sum of:
0.02450819 = product of:
0.04901638 = sum of:
0.04901638 = weight(_text_:j in 5220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04901638 = score(doc=5220,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16122058 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.304033 = fieldWeight in 5220, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1774964 = idf(docFreq=5010, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5220)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Journal Citation Reports provides a classification of journals most heavily cited by a given journal and which most heavily cite that journal, but size variation is not taken into account. Pudovkin and Garfield suggest a procedure for meeting this difficulty. The relatedness of journal i to journal j is determined by the number of citations from journal i to journal j in a given year normalized by the product of the papers published in the j journal in that year times the number of references cited in the i journal in that year. A multiplier of ten to the sixth is suggested to bring the values into an easily perceptible range. While citations received depend upon the overall cumulative number of papers published by a journal, the current year is utilized since that data is available in JCR. Citations to current year papers would be quite low in most fields and thus not included. To produce the final index, the maximum of the A citing B value, and the B citing A value is chosen and used to indicate the closeness of the journals. The procedure is illustrated for the journal Genetics.
-
Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001)
0.01
0.01203008 = product of:
0.02406016 = sum of:
0.02406016 = product of:
0.04812032 = sum of:
0.04812032 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04812032 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.12.2001 14:01:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006)
0.01
0.01203008 = product of:
0.02406016 = sum of:
0.02406016 = product of:
0.04812032 = sum of:
0.04812032 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04812032 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17767668 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05073824 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:20:01
