Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research fronts? (2007) 0.06 
    0.06199302 = product of:
  0.24797209 = sum of:
    0.24797209 = weight(_text_:field's in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24797209 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5097106 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.48649582 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.806516 = idf(docFreq=17, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    We present evidence that in some research fields, research published in journals and reported on the Web may collectively represent different evolutionary stages of the field, with journals lagging a few years behind the Web on average, and that a "two-tier" scholarly communication system may therefore be evolving. We conclude that in such fields, (a) for detecting current research fronts, author co-citation analyses (ACA) using articles published on the Web as a data source can outperform traditional ACAs using articles published in journals as data, and that (b) as a result, it is important to use multiple data sources in citation analysis studies of scholarly communication for a complete picture of communication patterns. Our evidence stems from comparing the respective intellectual structures of the XML research field, a subfield of computer science, as revealed from three sets of ACA covering two time periods: (a) from the field's beginnings in 1996 to 2001, and (b) from 2001 to 2006. For the first time period, we analyze research articles both from journals as indexed by the Science Citation Index (SCI) and from the Web as indexed by CiteSeer. We follow up by an ACA of SCI data for the second time period. We find that most trends in the evolution of this field from the first to the second time period that we find when comparing ACA results from the SCI between the two time periods already were apparent in the ACA results from CiteSeer during the first time period.
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.03 
    0.031367116 = product of:
  0.12546846 = sum of:
    0.12546846 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12546846 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.03 
    0.031367116 = product of:
  0.12546846 = sum of:
    0.12546846 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12546846 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.03 
    0.027724875 = product of:
  0.1108995 = sum of:
    0.1108995 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1108995 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.02 
    0.019604446 = product of:
  0.078417785 = sum of:
    0.078417785 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078417785 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  6. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.02 
    0.016634926 = product of:
  0.066539705 = sum of:
    0.066539705 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066539705 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  7. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.02 
    0.015683558 = product of:
  0.06273423 = sum of:
    0.06273423 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06273423 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  8. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.013723113 = product of:
  0.05489245 = sum of:
    0.05489245 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05489245 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  9. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.013723113 = product of:
  0.05489245 = sum of:
    0.05489245 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05489245 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  10. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.013723113 = product of:
  0.05489245 = sum of:
    0.05489245 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05489245 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  11. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  12. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  13. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  14. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  15. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  16. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  17. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  18. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01 
    0.011762667 = product of:
  0.04705067 = sum of:
    0.04705067 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04705067 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  19. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.009802223 = product of:
  0.039208893 = sum of:
    0.039208893 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039208893 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  20. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.01 
    0.007841779 = product of:
  0.031367116 = sum of:
    0.031367116 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031367116 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2026817 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057878803 = queryNorm
        0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 16
  • d 5

Types

Themes