Search (28 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02 
    0.024422953 = product of:
  0.10990328 = sum of:
    0.07631134 = product of:
      0.15262268 = sum of:
        0.15262268 = weight(_text_:1992 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15262268 = score(doc=4604,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            1.1732268 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03359194 = product of:
      0.06718388 = sum of:
        0.06718388 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06718388 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
    Source
    Mathematical intelligencer. 14(1992), no.4, S.4-5
    Year
    1992
  2. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.02 
    0.01506726 = product of:
  0.06780267 = sum of:
    0.057305183 = weight(_text_:forschung in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057305183 = score(doc=1934,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030992035 = queryNorm
        0.38007292 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
    0.0104974825 = product of:
      0.020994965 = sum of:
        0.020994965 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020994965 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    Abstract
    Um sich einer Antwort auf die Frage anzunähern, welche Bedeutung der Nachlass eines Wissenschaftlers wie jener Paul F. Lazarsfelds (mit zahlreichen noch unveröffentlichten Schriften) für die aktuelle Forschung haben könne, kann untersucht werden, wie häufig dieser Wissenschaftler zitiert wird. Wenn ein Autor zitiert wird, wird er auch genutzt. Wird er über einen langen Zeitraum oft genutzt, ist vermutlich auch die Auseinandersetzung mit seinem Nachlass von Nutzen. Außerdem kann aufgrund der Zitierungen festgestellt werden, was aus dem Lebenswerk eines Wissenschaftlers für die aktuelle Forschung relevant erscheint. Daraus können die vordringlichen Fragestellungen in der Bearbeitung des Nachlasses abgeleitet werden. Die Aufgabe für die folgende Untersuchung lautete daher: Wie oft wird Paul F. Lazarsfeld zitiert? Dabei interessierte auch: Wer zitiert wo? Die Untersuchung wurde mit Hilfe der Meta-Datenbank "ISI Web of Knowledge" durchgeführt. In dieser wurde im "Web of Science" mit dem Werkzeug "Cited Reference Search" nach dem zitierten Autor (Cited Author) "Lazarsfeld P*" gesucht. Diese Suche ergab 1535 Referenzen (References). Werden alle Referenzen gewählt, führt dies zu 4839 Ergebnissen (Results). Dabei wurden die Datenbanken SCI-Expanded, SSCI und A&HCI verwendet. Bei dieser Suche wurden die Publikationsjahre 1941-2008 analysiert. Vor 1956 wurden allerdings nur sehr wenige Zitate gefunden: 1946 fünf, ansonsten maximal drei, 1942-1944 und 1949 überhaupt keines. Zudem ist das Jahr 2008 noch lange nicht zu Ende. (Es gab jedoch schon vor Ende März 24 Zitate!)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  3. Garfield, E.: Essays of an information scientist (1977-) 0.01 
    0.013502525 = product of:
  0.121522725 = sum of:
    0.121522725 = product of:
      0.24304545 = sum of:
        0.24304545 = weight(_text_:1977 in 2015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24304545 = score(doc=2015,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.19089708 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.159553 = idf(docFreq=253, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            1.2731754 = fieldWeight in 2015, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              6.159553 = idf(docFreq=253, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2015)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Issue
    Vol.1: 1962-73(1977). - Vol.2: 1974-76(1977). - Vol.3: Vol.4: Vol.5: Vol.6: 1983(1984), dann jährlich ff.
  4. Gorraiz, J.: ¬Die unerträgliche Bedeutung der Zitate (1992) 0.01 
    0.008479038 = product of:
  0.07631134 = sum of:
    0.07631134 = product of:
      0.15262268 = sum of:
        0.15262268 = weight(_text_:1992 in 2824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15262268 = score(doc=2824,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            1.1732268 = fieldWeight in 2824, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2824)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Biblos. 41(1992) H.4, S.193-204
    Year
    1992
  5. Shapiro, F.R.: Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing and citation analysis : the neglected legal literature (1992) 0.01 
    0.0074191573 = product of:
  0.066772416 = sum of:
    0.066772416 = product of:
      0.13354483 = sum of:
        0.13354483 = weight(_text_:1992 in 4262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13354483 = score(doc=4262,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            1.0265734 = fieldWeight in 4262, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4262)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 43(1992), S.337-339
    Year
    1992
  6. Stock, W.G.: Forschung im internationalen Vergleich - Wissenschaftsindikatoren auf Zitationsbasis : ISI Essential Science Indicators (2002) 0.01 
    0.0063672424 = product of:
  0.057305183 = sum of:
    0.057305183 = weight(_text_:forschung in 474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.057305183 = score(doc=474,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030992035 = queryNorm
        0.38007292 = fieldWeight in 474, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=474)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschungsergebnisse aus einer elektronischen Datenbank heraus? Rangordnungen der wichtigsten Institutionen, Wissenschaftler, Zeitschriften und sogar Länder in Fachdisziplinen nach Einfluss? Markierung "heißer", hochaktueller Artikel? Auflisten der hochzitierten Forschungsfronten in den einzelnen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen? Und das alles auf Knopfdruck und nicht mittels umständlicher szientometrischer Verfahren? Geht so etwas überhaupt? Es geht. Mit den "Essential Science Indicators" (ESI) legt das ISl ein webbasiertes Informationssystem zur Wissenschaftsevaluation vor, das einzigartige Ergebnisse präsentiert und in der Tat ausgesprochen einfach zu bedienen ist. Aber es geht, verglichen mit ausgeklügelten Methoden der empirischen Wissenschaftsforschung, nicht alles. Wo liegen die Grenzen des Systems? Wir werden die Arbeitsweise der ESI, seine Datenbasis, die eingesetzten informetrischen Algorithmen - und deren methodischen Probleme, die Suchoberfläche sowie die Ergebnisdarstellung skizzieren. Als Beispiel dienen uns Aspekte deutscher Forschung. Etwa: In welcher Disziplin haben Deutschlands Forscher den größten internationalen Einfluss? Welches deutsche Institut der Neurowissenschaften kann aufglobaler Ebene mitmischen? Oder: Welcher in Deutschland tätige Wissenschaftler führt eine disziplinspezifische Rangordnung an?Letztlich: Wer braucht die "Essential Science Indicators"? - Wir testeten die Essential Science Indicators Mitte Februar 2002 anhand der Version vom 1. Januar 2002, die das Zehn-Jahres-Intervall 1991 bis 2000 sowie die ersten zehn Monate aus 2001 berücksichtigt.
  7. Piternick, A.B.: Name of an author! (1992) 0.01 
    0.0052993987 = product of:
  0.047694586 = sum of:
    0.047694586 = product of:
      0.09538917 = sum of:
        0.09538917 = weight(_text_:1992 in 3293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09538917 = score(doc=3293,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.7332668 = fieldWeight in 3293, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3293)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Indexer. 18(1992) no.2, S.95-100
    Year
    1992
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00 
    0.003732438 = product of:
  0.03359194 = sum of:
    0.03359194 = product of:
      0.06718388 = sum of:
        0.06718388 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06718388 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.00 
    0.0036018565 = product of:
  0.03241671 = sum of:
    0.03241671 = weight(_text_:forschung in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03241671 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15077418 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.030992035 = queryNorm
        0.21500172 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8649335 = idf(docFreq=926, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Ein britischer Forscher hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die geografischen Muster der Zitierungen von 1981 bis zur Gegenwart freizulegen. Das Ergebnis: Die publizistische Wahrnehmung ist in der Wissenschaft äußerst ungleich verteilt. Die USA dominieren mit großem Abstand vor dem Rest der WeIt. Und auch dort konzentrieren sich die Verweise auf einige wenige Ballungsräume der Forschung. Michael Batty vom Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London bediente sich für seine Analyse der Datenbank "ISIHighlyCited.com" (http: //www.isihighlycited.com/), in der Forscher aus verschiedenen Disziplinen aufgelistet werden, die die weltweit meisten Zitate auf sich gezogen haben. In diesen Ranglisten nehmen die akademischen Edelschmieden aus den USA etwa jene Rolle ein, die Österreichische Athleten im Alpinschisport besetzen. Einzig der Forschungsraum London kann mit der Konkurrenz aus Übersee halbwegs mithalten. Der Artikel "Citation Geography: It's About Location" von Michael Batty erschien im Magazin "The Scientist" (Band 17, Heft 16/10, Ausgabe vom 25.8.03; http://www.thescientist.com/yr2003/aug/opinion 030825.html). Die Zeitschrift ist nach individueller Registrierung frei zugänglich. Der Homepage des Autors http: //www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/citations/ können weitere Details entnommen werden. Ob die Anzahl derZitate auch etwas über die wissenschaftliche Qualität aussagt, ist genau so Gegenstand von Diskussionen, wie dies etwa bei den "Impact-Faktoren" von Journalen der Fall ist (vgl. "Kann wissenschaftliche Qualität gemessen werden?", http://science.orf.at/science/news/58648). Ganz wertfrei kann man die ISI-Daten jedenfalls dazu verwenden, um herauszufinden, in welchem Land, in welcher Stadt und in welcher Institution die meist zitierten Forscher dieses Erdballs sitzen. Das Ergebnis dieser von Michael Batty erstellten "Geografie derwissenschaftlichen Zitierung" ist eindeutig: Einige Wenige ziehen den Großteil der publizistischen Aufmerksamkeit auf sich - und lassen für den Rest nur wenig über. Diese Aussage gilt gleichermaßen für Ranglisten von Städten, Institutionen und Ländern. Und: In allen drei Fällen kommen die Spitzereiter aus dem US-amerikanischen Raum.
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0032990403 = product of:
  0.029691363 = sum of:
    0.029691363 = product of:
      0.059382726 = sum of:
        0.059382726 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059382726 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  11. Vaughan, L.; Shaw , D.: Bibliographic and Web citations : what Is the difference? (2003) 0.00 
    0.0023699633 = product of:
  0.02132967 = sum of:
    0.02132967 = product of:
      0.04265934 = sum of:
        0.04265934 = weight(_text_:1992 in 5176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04265934 = score(doc=5176,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.32792687 = fieldWeight in 5176, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5176)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Vaughn, and Shaw look at the relationship between traditional citation and Web citation (not hyperlinks but rather textual mentions of published papers). Using English language research journals in ISI's 2000 Journal Citation Report - Information and Library Science category - 1209 full length papers published in 1997 in 46 journals were identified. Each was searched in Social Science Citation Index and on the Web using Google phrase search by entering the title in quotation marks, and followed for distinction where necessary with sub-titles, author's names, and journal title words. After removing obvious false drops, the number of web sites was recorded for comparison with the SSCI counts. A second sample from 1992 was also collected for examination. There were a total of 16,371 web citations to the selected papers. The top and bottom ranked four journals were then examined and every third citation to every third paper was selected and classified as to source type, domain, and country of origin. Web counts are much higher than ISI citation counts. Of the 46 journals from 1997, 26 demonstrated a significant correlation between Web and traditional citation counts, and 11 of the 15 in the 1992 sample also showed significant correlation. Journal impact factor in 1998 and 1999 correlated significantly with average Web citations per journal in the 1997 data, but at a low level. Thirty percent of web citations come from other papers posted on the web, and 30percent from listings of web based bibliographic services, while twelve percent come from class reading lists. High web citation journals often have web accessible tables of content.
  12. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00 
    0.002332774 = product of:
  0.020994965 = sum of:
    0.020994965 = product of:
      0.04198993 = sum of:
        0.04198993 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04198993 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  13. Leydesdorff, L.; Opthof, T.: Citation analysis with medical subject Headings (MeSH) using the Web of Knowledge : a new routine (2013) 0.00 
    0.0020109804 = product of:
  0.018098824 = sum of:
    0.018098824 = product of:
      0.036197647 = sum of:
        0.036197647 = weight(_text_:1992 in 943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036197647 = score(doc=943,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13008796 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.27825516 = fieldWeight in 943, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.197464 = idf(docFreq=1806, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    Citation analysis of documents retrieved from the Medline database (at the Web of Knowledge) has been possible only on a case-by-case basis. A technique is presented here for citation analysis in batch mode using both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) at the Web of Knowledge and the Science Citation Index at the Web of Science (WoS). This freeware routine is applied to the case of "Brugada Syndrome," a specific disease and field of research (since 1992). The journals containing these publications, for example, are attributed to WoS categories other than "cardiac and cardiovascular systems", perhaps because of the possibility of genetic testing for this syndrome in the clinic. With this routine, all the instruments available for citation analysis can now be used on the basis of MeSH terms. Other options for crossing between Medline, WoS, and Scopus are also reviewed.
  14. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00 
    0.0019794244 = product of:
  0.017814819 = sum of:
    0.017814819 = product of:
      0.035629638 = sum of:
        0.035629638 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035629638 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  15. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.00 
    0.001866219 = product of:
  0.01679597 = sum of:
    0.01679597 = product of:
      0.03359194 = sum of:
        0.03359194 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03359194 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  16. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00 
    0.0016329415 = product of:
  0.014696474 = sum of:
    0.014696474 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029392948 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  17. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00 
    0.0016329415 = product of:
  0.014696474 = sum of:
    0.014696474 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029392948 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  18. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.00 
    0.0016329415 = product of:
  0.014696474 = sum of:
    0.014696474 = product of:
      0.029392948 = sum of:
        0.029392948 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029392948 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  19. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.00 
    0.0013996642 = product of:
  0.012596978 = sum of:
    0.012596978 = product of:
      0.025193956 = sum of:
        0.025193956 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025193956 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  20. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.00 
    0.0013996642 = product of:
  0.012596978 = sum of:
    0.012596978 = product of:
      0.025193956 = sum of:
        0.025193956 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025193956 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10852882 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.030992035 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 20
  • d 8

Types

  • a 27
  • el 3
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes