Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Kostoff, R.N.; Rio, J.A. del; Humenik, J.A.; Garcia, E.O.; Ramirez, A.M.: Citation mining : integrating text mining and bibliometrics for research user profiling (2001) 0.02 
    0.021130364 = product of:
  0.12678218 = sum of:
    0.12678218 = weight(_text_:themes in 6850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12678218 = score(doc=6850,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31552428 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.4018143 = fieldWeight in 6850, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6850)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Identifying the users and impact of research is important for research performers, managers, evaluators, and sponsors. It is important to know whether the audience reached is the audience desired. It is useful to understand the technical characteristics of the other research/development/applications impacted by the originating research, and to understand other characteristics (names, organizations, countries) of the users impacted by the research. Because of the many indirect pathways through which fundamental research can impact applications, identifying the user audience and the research impacts can be very complex and time consuming. The purpose of this article is to describe a novel approach for identifying the pathways through which research can impact other research, technology development, and applications, and to identify the technical and infrastructure characteristics of the user population. A novel literature-based approach was developed to identify the user community and its characteristics. The research performed is characterized by one or more articles accessed by the Science Citation Index (SCI) database, beccause the SCI's citation-based structure enables the capability to perform citation studies easily. The user community is characterized by the articles in the SCI that cite the original research articles, and that cite the succeeding generations of these articles as well. Text mining is performed on the citing articles to identify the technical areas impacted by the research, the relationships among these technical areas, and relationships among the technical areas and the infrastructure (authors, journals, organizations). A key component of text mining, concept clustering, was used to provide both a taxonomy of the citing articles' technical themes and further technical insights based on theme relationships arising from the grouping process. Bibliometrics is performed on the citing articles to profile the user characteristics. Citation Mining, this integration of citation bibliometrics and text mining, is applied to the 307 first generation citing articles of a fundamental physics article on the dynamics of vibrating sand-piles. Most of the 307 citing articles were basic research whose main themes were aligned with those of the cited article. However, about 20% of the citing articles were research or development in other disciplines, or development within the same discipline. The text mining alone identified the intradiscipline applications and extradiscipline impacts and applications; this was confirmed by detailed reading of the 307 abstracts. The combination of citation bibliometrics and text mining provides a synergy unavailable with each approach taken independently. Furthermore, text mining is a REQUIREMENT for a feasible comprehensive research impact determination. The integrated multigeneration citation analysis required for broad research impact determination of highly cited articles will produce thousands or tens or hundreds of thousands of citing article Abstracts.
  2. Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001) 0.02 
    0.018676776 = product of:
  0.11206066 = sum of:
    0.11206066 = weight(_text_:themes in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11206066 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31552428 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.35515702 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.429029 = idf(docFreq=193, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
  3. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.02 
    0.017731734 = product of:
  0.1063904 = sum of:
    0.1063904 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1063904 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  4. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.02 
    0.017731734 = product of:
  0.1063904 = sum of:
    0.1063904 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1063904 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  5. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.02 
    0.015672788 = product of:
  0.09403672 = sum of:
    0.09403672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09403672 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  6. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01 
    0.011082334 = product of:
  0.066494 = sum of:
    0.066494 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066494 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  7. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01 
    0.009403673 = product of:
  0.056422036 = sum of:
    0.056422036 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056422036 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  8. Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013) 0.01 
    0.008865867 = product of:
  0.0531952 = sum of:
    0.0531952 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0531952 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.12.2013 11:02:22
  9. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.01 
    0.0077576335 = product of:
  0.0465458 = sum of:
    0.0465458 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0465458 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  10. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.01 
    0.0077576335 = product of:
  0.0465458 = sum of:
    0.0465458 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0465458 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  11. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.0077576335 = product of:
  0.0465458 = sum of:
    0.0465458 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0465458 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
  12. Campanario, J.M.: Have referees rejected some of the most-cited articles of all times? (1996) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 4215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=4215,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4215, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4215)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In this article a quantitative study is reported on the resistance that scientists may encounter when they do innovative work or when they attempt to publish articles that later become highly cited. A set of 205 commentaries by authors of some of the most-cited papers of all times have been examined in order to identify those articles whose authors encountered difficulty in getting his or her work published. There are 22 commentaries (10,7%) in which authors mention some difficulty or resistance in doing or publishing the research reported in the article. Three of the articles which had problems in being published are the most cited from their respective journals. According the authors' commentaries, although sometimes referees' negative evaluations can help improve the articles, in other instances referees and editors wrongly rejected the highly cited articles
  13. Snyder, H.; Bonzi, S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines : 1980-1989 (1998) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:33:24
  14. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  15. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  16. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  17. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  18. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  19. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chambers, T.; Song, M.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.: Content-based citation analysis : the next generation of citation analysis (2014) 0.01 
    0.0066494 = product of:
  0.0398964 = sum of:
    0.0398964 = weight(_text_:22 in 1521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0398964 = score(doc=1521,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1521, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1521)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 16:52:04
  20. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.01 
    0.005541167 = product of:
  0.033247 = sum of:
    0.033247 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033247 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17186302 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.049078062 = queryNorm
        0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 17
  • d 5

Types

Themes