Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Computerlinguistik"
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. He, Q.: ¬A study of the strength indexes in co-word analysis (2000) 0.03
    0.031759724 = product of:
      0.06351945 = sum of:
        0.06351945 = product of:
          0.09527917 = sum of:
            0.05987073 = weight(_text_:i in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05987073 = score(doc=111,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16931784 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.35359967 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.7717297 = idf(docFreq=2765, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
            0.035408445 = weight(_text_:c in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035408445 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484828 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044891298 = queryNorm
                0.22866541 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.4494052 = idf(docFreq=3817, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Co-word analysis is a technique for detecting the knowledge structure of scientific literature and mapping the dynamics in a research field. It is used to count the co-occurrences of term pairs, compute the strength between term pairs, and map the research field by inserting terms and their linkages into a graphical structure according to the strength values. In previous co-word studies, there are two indexes used to measure the strength between term pairs in order to identify the major areas in a research field - the inclusion index (I) and the equivalence index (E). This study will conduct two co-word analysis experiments using the two indexes, respectively, and compare the results from the two experiments. The results show, due to the difference in their computation, index I is more likely to identify general subject areas in a research field while index E is more likely to identify subject areas at more specific levels
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al